15 research outputs found
Static and dynamic analysis of clamped orthotropic plates using Lagrangian multiplier technique
A Novel Numerical Delamination Growth Initiation Approach for the Preliminary Design of Damage Tolerant Composite Structures
Bearing Deformation Behavior of Carbon/Bismaleimide Composites Containing One and Two Bolted Joints
A Linear Numerical Approach to Simulate the Delamination Growth Initiation in Stiffened Composite Panels
Total Fatigue Life Prediction Growth Rate Models for FGI 1854 E-glass/Dow 510A-40 Vinyl Ester Composite Laminates
Nivolumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Efficacy and Safety in CheckMate 141 by Prior Cetuximab Use
PURPOSE:
Cetuximab, which modulates immune responses, may affect the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy. Here, we assessed outcomes with nivolumab, by prior cetuximab exposure, in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had experienced progression within 6 months of platinum-containing chemotherapy.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
In the randomized, open-label, phase III CheckMate 141 trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy, with stratification by prior cetuximab exposure. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); additional endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.
RESULTS:
In patients with prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 7.1 months with nivolumab versus 5.1 months with IC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62-1.15); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across most demographic subgroups. In patients without prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 8.2 months with nivolumab versus 4.9 months with IC (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.77); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across patient baseline subgroups including tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (<1% or 651%). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event rates favored nivolumab versus IC in both subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Nivolumab appeared to improve efficacy versus IC regardless of prior cetuximab use, supporting its use in patients with R/M SCCHN with or without prior cetuximab exposure. The reduction in risk of death with nivolumab compared with IC was greater in patients without prior cetuximab exposure versus with prior cetuximab exposure