15 research outputs found

    A: Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining of the fecal colonocytes isolated from rat stool.

    No full text
    <p><b>B:</b> Differentially expressed miRNAs in the fecal colonocytes obtained from tumor bearing and tumor non-bearing AOM rats. *: p<0.05. Specific p values are given in which AOM rats without tumors are compared to AOM rats with tumors.</p

    MicroRNA modulation in premalignant 16 wk miRNA predicts future neoplasia development.

    No full text
    <p>MicroRNA analysis was done on colonic biopsies from AOM rats at a preneoplastic (16 wk) time point. The rats were followed for 40 weeks and separated as tumor bearing and non-bearing AOM rats. The miRNA expression at the premalignant stage (16 wk) was then compared between the control rats and the AOM rats which eventually developed tumors or remained non-tumor bearing. *: p<0.05 when compared to normal saline controls. Specific p values are given in which AOM rats without tumors are compared to AOM rats with tumors.</p

    Inhibition of cellular proliferation and induction of cell cycle arrest by PEG-8000 in SCC-25 cells- SCC-25 cells were treated with different concentrations of PEG-8000 for 24 h and then assayed for proliferation using standard WST-1 assay.

    No full text
    <p>As shown (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g004" target="_blank">Figure 4A</a>), there was a dose dependent decrease in the cell growth, with maximal decrease of 43% obtained at 10% PEG-8000. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g004" target="_blank">Figure 4B</a> shows a ∼50% decrease on the expression of proliferation marker PCNA by PEG. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g004" target="_blank">Figure 4C</a> shows the effect of PEG on cell cycle distribution. The 24 h PEG treated cells were stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry. PEG blocked cells in the S-phase (by 62%) and correspondingly increases the cells in G2-M phase (by 38%).</p

    Effect of topical oral application of PEG-8000 on the initiation and progression of 4NQO-induced oral cancer –Fisher rats were provided 4NQO (20 ppm) in drinking water for 14 weeks before switching to regular water and randomizing into two groups.

    No full text
    <p>The first group received a daily (3–4 minute) topical application of 10% PEG-8000 via oral painting and the second group was sham painted (PEG-control group). This regimen was continued for 14 additional weeks before euthanization. The rats were euthanized after 14 weeks and the oral cavity subjected to macroscopic tumor assessment of total tumors (≥0.2 cm). As shown, 4NQO-treated rats developed multiple large tumors in the oral cavity mostly originating from tongue and few from the wall of the oral cavity. PEG reduced the overall tumor number (tumors/tumor bearing rat) (p = 0.05) and the growth of tumors (tumor volume) compared to their age-matched counterparts (p = 0.02). The tumor volume (size) was measured according to the formula width × length × height × π/6.</p

    Effect of topical oral application of PEG-8000 on the premalignant epithelial hyperproliferation – To evaluate histopathological grading of the oral/tongue tissue, the formalin fixed sections were paraffin embedded, sectioned and subjected to H&E staining.

    No full text
    <p>As shown (top Panel; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2A</a>), 4NQO-treated rat sections revealed many localized regions of mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia in morphologically normal appearing mucosa that was normalized by PEG [higher magnification (63×; cropped image) insets demonstrate the presence of mitotic figures in the 4 NQO-treated group alone]. To further study the effects of PEG on the mucosal hyper-proliferation, we performed the immunohistochemical analysis of nuclear antigen Ki67, a well-defined marker of proliferation. A total of 1000 epithelial cells were evaluated from 6–7 fields. As shown (bottom Panel; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2A–B</a>), 4NQO-treatment increased the proliferation in morphologically normal tongue mucosa as depicted by increased number of Ki67-labelled epithelial cells/per optical field compared to age matched carcinogen free controls. (p<0.01). Topical application of PEG on the other hand dramatically reduced the number of Ki67-labelled epithelial cells/per optical field (p<0.01).</p

    Effect of PEG-8000 on EGFR, cyclin D1 and p21 expression in SCC-25 cells-For these studies, western blot analysis was performed on lysates obtained from SCC-25 cell treated for 24 h with PEG-8000.

    No full text
    <p>As shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g005" target="_blank">Figure 5A</a>, consonant with the <i>in vivo</i> experiments PEG caused a significant decrease EGFR (∼45% compared to vehicle control; p<002) and cyclin D1 (∼57% compared to control vehicle; p<0.005) expression. In a similar experimental protocol (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038047#pone-0038047-g005" target="_blank">Figure 5B</a>), PEG-8000 caused ∼54% increase in p21 expression (p<0.001).</p

    Prevention of colonic neoplasia with polyethylene glycol: A short term randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded trial

    No full text
    <div><p>Chemoprevention represents an attractive modality against colorectal cancer (CRC) although widespread clinical implementation of promising agents (e.g. aspirin/NSAIDS) have been stymied by both suboptimal efficacy and concerns over toxicity. This highlights the need for better agents. Several groups, including our own, have reported that the over-the-counter laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG) has remarkable efficacy in rodent models of colon carcinogenesis. In this study, we undertook the first randomized human trial to address the role of PEG in prevention of human colonic neoplasia. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm trial where eligible subjects were randomized to 8g PEG-3350 (n = 27) or 17g PEG-3350 (n = 24), or placebo (n = 24; maltodextrin) orally for a duration of six months. Our initial primary endpoint was rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF) but this was changed during protocol period to rectal mucosal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Of the 87 patients randomized, 48 completed study primary endpoints and rectal EGFR unchanged PEG treatment. Rectal ACF had a trend suggesting potentially reduction with PEG treatment (pre-post change 1.7 in placebo versus -0.3 in PEG 8+ 17g doses, p = 0.108). Other endpoints (proliferation, apoptosis, expression of SNAIL and E-cadherin), previously noted to be modulated in rodent models, appeared unchanged with PEG treatment in this clinical trial. We conclude that PEG was generally well tolerated with the trial failing to meet primary efficacy endpoints. However, rectal ACFs demonstrated a trend (albeit statistically insignificant) for suppression with PEG. Moreover, all molecular assays including EGFR were unaltered with PEG underscoring issues with lack of translatability of biomarkers from preclinical to clinical trials. This data may provide the impetus for future clinical trials on PEG using more robust biomarkers of chemoprevention.</p><p><b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00828984" target="_blank">NCT00828984</a></p></div
    corecore