5 research outputs found

    Phase 2 Study of Anti-Human Cytomegalovirus Monoclonal Antibodies for Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

    Get PDF
    Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause significant disease in immunocompromised patients, and treatment options are limited by toxicities. CSJ148 is a combination of two anti-HCMV human monoclonal antibodies (LJP538 and LJP539) that bind to and inhibit the functions of viral HCMV glycoprotein B (gB) and the pentameric complex, consisting of glycoproteins gH, gL, UL128, UL130, and UL131. In this phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of CSJ148 for prophylaxis of HCMV in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As would be expected in the study population, all the patients (100%) reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. There were 22 deaths during this study, and over 80% of the patients receiving placebo or CSJ148 developed at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher severity. No subject who received antibody developed a hypersensitivity- or infusion-related reaction. CSJ148-treated patients showed trends toward decreased viral load, shorter median duration of preemptive therapy, and fewer courses of preemptive therapy. However, the estimated probability that CSJ148 decreases the need for preemptive therapy compared to placebo was 69%, with a risk ratio of 0.89 and a 90% credible interval of 0.61 to 1.31. The primary efficacy endpoint was therefore not met, indicating that CSJ148 did not prevent clinically significant HCMV reactivation in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02268526 and at EudraCT under number 2017-002047-15.)

    Evaluation of clinical drug interaction potential of clofazimine using static and dynamic modeling approaches

    No full text
    The 2016 World Health Organization treatment recommendations for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) positioned clofazimine as a core second-line drug. Being identified as a cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitor in vitro, a CYP-mediated drug interaction may be likely when clofazimine is co-administered with substrates of these enzymes. The CYP-mediated drug interaction potential of clofazimine was evaluated using both static (estimation of “R1” and area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio [AUCR] values) and dynamic (physiologically based pharmacokinetic [PBPK]) modeling approaches. For static and dynamic predictions, midazolam, repaglinide, and desipramine were used as probe substrates for CYP3A4/5, CYP2C8, and CYP2D6, respectively. The AUCR static model estimations for clofazimine with the substrates midazolam, repaglinide, and desipramine were 5.59, 1.34, and 1.69, respectively. The fold increase in AUC predicted for midazolam, repaglinide, and desipramine with clofazimine based upon PBPK modeling was 2.66, 1.70, and 1.48, respectively. Clofazimine was predicted to be a moderate to strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitor and weak CYP2C8 and CYP2D6 inhibitor based on the calculated AUCR by static and PBPK modeling. Additionally, for selected antiretroviral, antitubercular, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and antihyperlipidemic CYP3A4/5 substrate drugs, approximately 2- to 6-fold increases in the AUC were predicted with static modeling when co-administered with 100 mg of clofazimine. Therefore, the possibility of an increase in the AUC of CYP3A4/5 substrates when co-administered with clofazimine cannot be ignored

    Utilization of in silico tools to investigate the in vivo performance of vildagliptin modified release (MR) 100 mg tablets in healthy subjects using physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) and evaluate an approach to establish clinically relevant dissolution specifications

    No full text
    The objective of the study was to predict pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of matrix based modified release (MR) drug product of vildagliptin. Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) was developed using GastroPlus™ based on the available data including immediate-release (IR) drug product of vildagliptin. In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) was developed using mechanistic deconvolution to predict plasma concentration-time profile and PK parameters for a MR drug product planned for clinical use. Both methods i.e., PBBM and IVIVC were compared for the predicted PK parameters. Integration of DDDPlus™ and GastroPlus™ modeling was performed to explore clinically relevant dissolution specifications for vildagliptin MR tablets. The bioequivalence (BE) between batches with different dissolution specifications was evaluated using virtual clinical trials. The PD effect of Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibition was simulated utilizing PDPlus™ model in GastroPlus™. The results indicated that IVIVC best correlated the simulated PK parameters with those observed with the clinical study. The outcomes highlight the importance of integration of in vitro and in silico tools towards predictability of PK and PD parameters for a MR drug product. However, the post absorptive phase was found to be more dependent on the demographics of the healthy subjects

    Genotoxicity evaluation of a valsartan-related complex N-nitroso-impurity

    No full text
    Recently, the formation of genotoxic and carcinogenic N-nitrosamines impurities during drug manufacturing has been described. However, drug-related (complex) nitrosamines may also be generated under certain conditions, i.e., through nitrosation of vulnerable amines in drug substances in the presence of nitrite. An investigation of valsartan drug substance showed that a complex API-related N-nitrosamine chemically designated as (S)-2-(((2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)(nitroso)amino)-3-methylbutanoic acid (named 181-14) may be generated. 181-14 was shown to be devoid of a mutagenic potential in the Ames test. According to ICH M7 (R1) (2018), impurities that are not mutagenic in the Ames test would be considered Class 5 impurities and limited according to ICH Q3A and B (R2) (2006) guidelines. However, certain regulatory authorities raised the concern that the Ames test may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect a mutagenic potential of nitrosamines and requested a confirmatory in vivo study using a transgenic animal genotoxicitymodel. Our data show that 181-14 was not mutagenic in the transgenic gene mutation assay in MutaTMMice. The data support the conclusion that the Ames test is an adequate and sensitive test system to assess a mutagenic potential of nitrosamines

    Phase 2 Study of Anti-Human Cytomegalovirus Monoclonal Antibodies for Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

    No full text
    Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause significant disease in immunocompromised patients, and treatment options are limited by toxicities. CSJ148 is a combination of two anti-HCMV human monoclonal antibodies (UP538 and UP539) that bind to and inhibit the functions of viral HCMV glycoprotein B (gB) and the pentameric complex, consisting of glycoproteins gH, gL, UL128, UL130, and UL131. In this phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of CSJ148 for prophylaxis of HCMV in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As would be expected in the study population, all the patients (100%) reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. There were 22 deaths during this study, and over 80% of the patients receiving placebo or CSJ148 developed at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher severity. No subject who received antibody developed a hypersensitivity- or infusion-related reaction. CSJ148-treated patients showed trends toward decreased viral load, shorter median duration of preemptive therapy, and fewer courses of preemptive therapy. However, the estimated probability that CSJ148 decreases the need for preemptive therapy compared to placebo was 69%, with a risk ratio of 0.89 and a 90% credible interval of 0.61 to 1.31. The primary efficacy endpoint was therefore not met, indicating that CSJ148 did not prevent clinically significant HCMV reactivation in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants
    corecore