Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking

Background: Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally. Methods: A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed: Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity. Results: Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel: preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures. Conclusion: The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery

International lower limb collaborative (INTELLECT) study: a multicentre, international retrospective audit of lower extremity open fractures

Trauma remains a major cause of mortality and disability across the world1, with a higher burden in developing nations2. Open lower extremity injuries are devastating events from a physical3, mental health4, and socioeconomic5 standpoint. The potential sequelae, including risk of chronic infection and amputation, can lead to delayed recovery and major disability6. This international study aimed to describe global disparities, timely intervention, guideline-directed care, and economic aspects of open lower limb injuries

Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on Better Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Head and Neck Cancer

Objectives: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are often highly affected by disease and treatment, resulting in impaired physical functioning and quality of life. Therefore, evaluation of patients’ psychosocial and functional outcomes can be facilitated by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). By providing the patients’ own perspectives, PROMs are crucial to improving patient-centered care. This study aimed to improve understanding of the perceived value of PROMs in HNC care and how to optimize their clinical value based on patients’ and multidisciplinary healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives.Methods: Population-based surveys among patients with HNC through their patient association and among HCPs nationwide through the Dutch Head and Neck Audit.Results: A total of 54 patients and 40 multidisciplinary HCPs from all 14 nationwide HNC centers (100%) responded. For patients, the most important element of patient-reported outcome collection systems was including a call to action for those with worse-than-average scores (28%), whereas clinicians found discussing scores during clinical visits the most important (39%). Although 16% of clinicians found short completion time the most important element, none of the patients selected completion time as most important. Additionally, 17% of patients stated completion time was not an issue, provided clinicians would use the outcomes for clinical purposes.Conclusions: Although patients and clinicians acknowledged the value of patient-reported outcomes, patients would like to be more involved in the clinical implications of their outcomes. Enhancing patients’ involvement by a call to action and providing feedback on their scores during outpatient clinic visits may improve the clinical value of PROMs.</p

Dorsal Subluxation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint After Volar Base Fracture of the Middle Phalanx

Background: Treatment decisions regarding volar base fractures of the middle phalanx depend on whether the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is reduced. Our aim was to study the agreement among hand surgeons in determining whether the PIP joint fractures are subluxated and to study the factors associated with subluxation of these fractures. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, 413 volar base fractures of the middle phalanx were included. Demographic and injury-related factors were gathered from medical records and radiographs. Using a Web-based survey, interobserver agreement was determined among 105 hand surgeons on the assessment of PIP joint subluxation of a series of 26 cases. Using the cohort of 413 fractures, a threshold for percent articular involvement and relative fracture displacement that corresponds with subluxation of the PIP joint was analyzed. Results: We found moderate to substantial agreement between hand surgeons on subluxation (κ = 0.59, P <.0001) and an overall percent agreement of 85%. Percent articular involvement and relative fracture displacement were independently associated with subluxation of the PIP joint (P <.001). Percent articular involvement of 35% had a specificity of 90% and a negative predicting value (NPV) of 92% for joint subluxation. Relative fracture displacement of 35% had a specificity of 92% and an NPV of 94% for joint subluxation. Conclusions: Surgeons generally agree on whether a PIP joint is subluxated. Percent articular involvement and relative fragment displacement are objective measurements that can help characterize joint stability and assist with decision-making

Testing for Implicit Gender Bias among Plastic Surgeons

Background: The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of implicit bias within the field of plastic surgery using a gender-specific Implicit Association Test (IAT), specifically looking at gender and career stereotypes. Methods: A Gender-Career/Family Implicit Association Test was developed and distributed to the international plastic surgery community. Mean scores were calculated. Respondents were provided with an automated summary interpretation of their results, categorizing association for a particular grouping of gender and career/family as a little or no, slight, moderate, or strong. Respondents were also asked a series of demographic and post-IAT questions. Results: Ninety-five responses were available for analysis. Overall, respondents showed a moderate-to-strong association of male + career / female + family compared with the reverse, which was statistically significant. Nearly half of the respondents thought they might have an implicit gender-related bias; however, 50% post-test would not change their behavior based on results, while 9.5% would. Conclusions: Plastics surgeons may have an unconscious tendency to associate men with a career and women with a family. Further steps must be taken to increase awareness and mitigate the impact of implicit gender bias