19 research outputs found

    Relative risk models including all five high risk factors.

    No full text
    Relative risk models including all five high risk factors.</p

    Predefined NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal adverse events.

    No full text
    Predefined NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal adverse events.</p

    Proportion of patients with NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal adverse events under naproxen treatment (n = 426).

    No full text
    Proportion of patients with NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal adverse events under naproxen treatment (n = 426).</p

    Patient demographics and baseline characteristics of the two trial populations receiving enteric-coated naproxen (pooled data; safety set).

    No full text
    Patient demographics and baseline characteristics of the two trial populations receiving enteric-coated naproxen (pooled data; safety set).</p

    Ulcer development under naproxen treatment (n = 426).

    No full text
    Ulcer development under naproxen treatment (n = 426).</p

    Influence of the number of risk factors on ulcer development (n = 426).

    No full text
    Influence of the number of risk factors on ulcer development (n = 426).</p

    The VITRO Score (Von Willebrand Factor Antigen/Thrombocyte Ratio) as a New Marker for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Comparison to Other Non-Invasive Parameters of Fibrosis Including ELF Test

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), defined as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg, causes major complications. HVPG is not always available, so a non-invasive tool to diagnose CSPH would be useful. VWF-Ag can be used to diagnose. Using the VITRO score (the VWF-Ag/platelet ratio) instead of VWF-Ag itself improves the diagnostic accuracy of detecting cirrhosis/ fibrosis in HCV patients.</p><p>Aim</p><p>This study tested the diagnostic accuracy of VITRO score detecting CSPH compared to HVPG measurement.</p><p>Methods</p><p>All patients underwent HVPG testing and were categorised as CSPH or no CSPH. The following patient data were determined: CPS, D’Amico stage, VITRO score, APRI and transient elastography (TE).</p><p>Results</p><p>The analysis included 236 patients; 170 (72%) were male, and the median age was 57.9 (35.2–76.3; 95% CI). Disease aetiology included ALD (39.4%), HCV (23.4%), NASH (12.3%), other (8.1%) and unknown (11.9%). The CPS showed 140 patients (59.3%) with CPS A; 56 (23.7%) with CPS B; and 18 (7.6%) with CPS C. 136 patients (57.6%) had compensated and 100 (42.4%) had decompensated cirrhosis; 83.9% had HVPG ≥10 mmHg. The VWF-Ag and the VITRO score increased significantly with worsening HVPG categories (P<0.0001). ROC analysis was performed for the detection of CSPH and showed AUC values of 0.92 for TE, 0.86 for VITRO score, 0.79 for VWF-Ag, 0.68 for ELF and 0.62 for APRI.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The VITRO score is an easy way to diagnose CSPH independently of CPS in routine clinical work and may improve the management of patients with cirrhosis.</p></div
    corecore