The changing landscape of disaster volunteering: opportunities, responses and gaps in Australia

There is a growing expectation that volunteers will have a greater role in disaster management in the future compared to the past. This is driven largely by a growing focus on building resilience to disasters. At the same time, the wider landscape of volunteering is fundamentally changing in the twenty-first century. This paper considers implications of this changing landscape for the resilience agenda in disaster management, with a focus on Australia. It first reviews major forces and trends impacting on disaster volunteering, highlighting four key developments: the growth of more diverse and episodic volunteering styles, the impact of new communications technology, greater private sector involvement and growing government expectations of and intervention in the voluntary sector. It then examines opportunities in this changing landscape for the Australian emergency management sector across five key strategic areas and provides examples of Australian responses to these opportunities to date. The five areas of focus are: developing more flexible volunteering strategies, harnessing spontaneous volunteering, building capacity to engage digital (and digitally enabled) volunteers, tapping into the growth of employee and skills-based volunteering and co-producing community-based disaster risk reduction. Although there have been considerable steps taken in Australia in some of these areas, overall there is still a long way to go before the sector can take full advantage of emerging opportunities. The paper thus concludes by identifying important research and practice gaps in this area

Mechanism of diacylglycerol-induced membrane targeting and activation of protein kinase Cdelta.

The regulatory domains of novel protein kinases C (PKC) contain two C1 domains (C1A and C1B), which have been identified as the interaction site for sn-1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG) and phorbol ester, and a C2 domain that may be involved in interaction with lipids and/or proteins. Although recent reports have indicated that C1A and C1B domains of conventional PKCs play different roles in their DAG-mediated membrane binding and activation, the individual roles of C1A and C1B domains in the DAG-mediated activation of novel PKCs have not been fully understood. In this study, we determined the roles of C1A and C1B domains of PKCdelta by means of in vitro lipid binding analyses and cellular protein translocation measurements. Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance measurements showed that isolated C1A and C1B domains of PKCdelta have opposite affinities for DAG and phorbol ester; i.e. the C1A domain with high affinity for DAG and the C1B domain with high affinity for phorbol ester. Furthermore, in vitro activity and membrane binding analyses of PKCdelta mutants showed that the C1A domain is critical for the DAG-induced membrane binding and activation of PKCdelta. The studies also indicated that an anionic residue, Glu(177), in the C1A domain plays a key role in controlling the DAG accessibility of the conformationally restricted C1A domain in a phosphatidylserine-dependent manner. Cell studies with enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged PKCdelta and mutants showed that because of its phosphatidylserine specificity PKCdelta preferentially translocated to the plasma membrane under the conditions in which DAG is randomly distributed among intracellular membranes of HEK293 cells. Collectively, these results provide new insight into the differential roles of C1 domains in the DAG-induced membrane activation of PKCdelta and the origin of its specific subcellular localization in response to DAG

Diacylglycerol-induced membrane targeting and activation of protein kinase Cepsilon: mechanistic differences between protein kinases Cdelta and Cepsilon.

Two novel protein kinases C (PKC), PKCdelta and PKCepsilon, have been reported to have opposing functions in some mammalian cells. To understand the basis of their distinct cellular functions and regulation, we investigated the mechanism of in vitro and cellular sn-1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG)-mediated membrane binding of PKCepsilon and compared it with that of PKCdelta. The regulatory domains of novel PKC contain a C2 domain and a tandem repeat of C1 domains (C1A and C1B), which have been identified as the interaction site for DAG and phorbol ester. Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance measurements showed that isolated C1A and C1B domains of PKCepsilon have comparably high affinities for DAG and phorbol ester. Furthermore, in vitro activity and membrane binding analyses of PKCepsilon mutants showed that both the C1A and C1B domains play a role in the DAG-induced membrane binding and activation of PKCepsilon. The C1 domains of PKCepsilon are not conformationally restricted and readily accessible for DAG binding unlike those of PKCdelta. Consequently, phosphatidylserine-dependent unleashing of C1 domains seen with PKCdelta was not necessary for PKCepsilon. Cell studies with fluorescent protein-tagged PKCs showed that, due to the lack of lipid headgroup selectivity, PKCepsilon translocated to both the plasma membrane and the nuclear membrane, whereas PKCdelta migrates specifically to the plasma membrane under the conditions in which DAG is evenly distributed among intracellular membranes of HEK293 cells. Also, PKCepsilon translocated much faster than PKCdelta due to conformational flexibility of its C1 domains. Collectively, these results provide new insight into the differential activation mechanisms of PKCdelta and PKCepsilon based on different structural and functional properties of their C1 domains