Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance

Investigations of situations involving spatial discordance between auditory and visual data which can otherwise be attributed to a common origin have revealed two main phenomena:cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion (or ventriloquism). The focus of the present study is the relationship between these two. The question asked was whether bias occurred only with fusion, as is predicted by some accounts of reactions to discordance, among them those based on cue substitution. The approach consisted of having subjects, on each trial, both point to signals in one modality in the presence of conflicting signals in the other modality and produce same-different origin judgments. To avoid the confounding of immediate effects with cumulative adaptation, which was allowed in most previous studies, the direction and amplitude of discordance was varied randomly from trial to trial. Experiment 1, which was a pilot study, showed that both visual bias of auditory localization and auditory bias of visual localization can be observed under such conditions. Experiment 2, which addressed the main question, used a method which controls for the selection involved in separating fusion from no-fusion trials and showed that the attraction of auditory localization by conflicting visual inputs occurs even when fusion is not reported. This result is inconsistent with purely postperceptual views of cross-modal interactions. The question could not be answered for auditory bias of visual localization, which, although significant, was very small in Experiment 1 and fell below significance under the conditions of Experiment 2. © 1981 Psychonomic Society, Inc.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location

Studies of reactions to audiovisual spatial conflict (alias "ventriloquism") are generally presented as informing on the processes of intermodal coordination. However, most of the literature has failed to isolate genuine perceptual effects from voluntary postperceptual adjustments. A new approach, based on psychophysical staircases, is applied to the case of the immediate visual bias of auditory localization. Subjects have to judge the apparent origin of stereophonically controlled sound bursts as left or right of a median reference line. Successive trials belong to one of two staircases, starting respectively at extreme left and right locations, and are moved progressively toward the median on the basis of the subjects' responses. Response reversals occur for locations farther away from center when a central lamp is flashed in synchrony with the bursts than without flashes (Experiment 1), revealing an attraction of the sounds toward the flashes. The effect cannot originate in voluntary postperceptual decision, since the occurrence of response reversal implies that the subject is uncertain concerning the direction of the target sound. The attraction is contingent on sound-flash synchronization, for early response reversals did no longer occur when the inputs from the two modalities were desynchronized (Experiment 2). Taken together, the results show that the visual bias of auditory localization observed repeatedly in less controlled conditions is due partly at least to an automatic attraction of the apparent location of sound by spatially discordant but temporally correlated visual inputs.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

No effect of auditory–visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration

It is known that the brain adaptively recalibrates itself to small (∼100 ms) auditory–visual (AV) temporal asynchronies so as to maintain intersensory temporal coherence. Here we explored whether spatial disparity between a sound and light affects AV temporal recalibration. Participants were exposed to a train of asynchronous AV stimulus pairs (sound-first or light-first) with sounds and lights emanating from either the same or a different location. Following a short exposure phase, participants were tested on an AV temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Temporal recalibration manifested itself as a shift of subjective simultaneity in the direction of the adapted audiovisual lag. The shift was equally big when exposure and test stimuli were presented from the same or different locations. These results provide strong evidence for the idea that spatial co-localisation is not a necessary constraint for intersensory pairing to occur

Anti-Allergic Cromones Inhibit Histamine and Eicosanoid Release from Activated Human and Murine Mast Cells by Releasing Annexin A1

PMCID: PMC3601088This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited