123 research outputs found

    Additional file 1: of Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population

    No full text
    Cluster analysis, This additional file presents 3–13 and a 16 cluster solutions. The 8 cluster solution was the solution chosen for analysis as it presented the least amount of variation within clusters (based on the SD’s). (XLSX 48 kb

    Frequency and type of likely clinically important findings by modality.

    No full text
    ^N = number of reports (% of all reports for same modality). #N = number of times finding present (% of all findings for same modality). αN = number of times finding reported as present (% of same finding). (DOCX)</p

    Demographics (sex and age) of patients that had imaging requested, number of reporting radiologists and imaging requestors, and word count and number of imaging findings reported, by imaging modality.

    No full text
    Demographics (sex and age) of patients that had imaging requested, number of reporting radiologists and imaging requestors, and word count and number of imaging findings reported, by imaging modality.</p

    GP and rheumatologist management for Vignette 4 (Adhesive capsulitis, same patient as Vignette 3 two months later).

    No full text
    ∧<p>Some people indicated where they would place the glucocorticoid injection even though they did not indicate that they would administer the injection.</p

    Clinically unimportant findings that were reported to exclude the presence of the pathology by number of reports and overall frequency of the finding.

    No full text
    Clinically unimportant findings that were reported to exclude the presence of the pathology by number of reports and overall frequency of the finding.</p

    Flow chart of report coding process.

    No full text
    Notes: *’Benign’ findings were explicitly qualified as ‘normal’, ‘normal for age’, ‘benign’, ‘clinically unimportant’, ‘non-significant’ and/or other related synonyms. ^One MRI finding (‘CBD’) was excluded as its meaning was unclear.</p

    The likely clinically unimportant findings that were reported to be present by imaging modality: The number (%) of reports that indicated the specific finding was present and frequency (%) of the finding across reports in order of frequency, and the number (%) that were reported to be benign.

    No full text
    The likely clinically unimportant findings that were reported to be present by imaging modality: The number (%) of reports that indicated the specific finding was present and frequency (%) of the finding across reports in order of frequency, and the number (%) that were reported to be benign.</p

    Total and domain readiness indices for family planning, antenatal care and basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care in 2015 and 2021 and change over time.

    No full text
    Total and domain readiness indices for family planning, antenatal care and basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care in 2015 and 2021 and change over time.</p
    corecore