23 research outputs found

    Determination of Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocyst viability by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a ribosomal RNA-directed probes

    No full text
    Free to read from publisher website AIMS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been proposed for species-specific detection, and viability determination of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. FISH-based viability determination depends on rRNA decay after loss of viability. We examined the effects of RNase(s) and RNase inhibitors on FISH of C. parvum. METHODS AND RESULTS: FISH was performed using a 5'-Texas red-labelled DNA oligonucleotide probe at 1 pM microl(-1). Intact and heat-permeabilized oocysts were treated with 1-100 microg ml(-1) RNase. FISH of intact oocysts appeared unaffected by exogenous RNase if this was neutralized before permeabilization. FISH fluorescence of heat-killed oocysts stored in phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature decayed by 1/2 after 55 h, but remained detectable after 6 days. Addition of vanadyl ribonucleoside complex (VRC) extended rRNA half-life of heat-permeabilized oocysts to 155 h. CONCLUSIONS: Extended rRNA half-life may result in viability overestimation using FISH. RNase pretreatment before FISH is recommended to destroy residual rRNA in recently killed oocysts. Incorporation of 1-10 mM l(-1) VRC before FISH permeabilization steps should neutralize RNase activity. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Elimination of FISH fluorescence of nonviable C. parvum is desirable. Use of RNase and VRC is suggested to reduce numbers of false-positive 'viable' oocysts

    Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples

    No full text
    Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q-PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q-PCR assays. Intra-assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q-PCR assays (CV from 11.2 to 26), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q-PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA-derived curves giving higher r 2 values and Q-PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q-PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10 -3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10 -1 and 10 -2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q-PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously. © 2005 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    corecore