Pressure- versus volume-limited sustained inflations at resuscitation of premature newborn lambs

BACKGROUND: Sustained inflations (SI) are advocated for the rapid establishment of FRC after birth in preterm and term infants requiring resuscitation. However, the most appropriate way to deliver a SI is poorly understood. We investigated whether a volume-limited SI improved the establishment of FRC and ventilation homogeneity and reduced lung inflammation/injury compared to a pressure-limited SI. METHODS: 131 d gestation lambs were resuscitated with either: i) pressure-limited SI (PressSI: 0-40 cmH2O over 5 s, maintained until 20 s); or ii) volume-limited SI (VolSI: 0-15 mL/kg over 5 s, maintained until 20 s). Following the SI, all lambs were ventilated using volume-controlled ventilation (7 mL/kg tidal volume) for 15 min. Lung mechanics, regional ventilation distribution (electrical impedance tomography), cerebral tissue oxygenation index (near infrared spectroscopy), arterial pressures and blood gas values were recorded regularly. Pressure-volume curves were performed in-situ post-mortem and early markers of lung injury were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to a pressure-limited SI, a volume-limited SI had increased pressure variability but reduced volume variability. Each SI strategy achieved similar end-inflation lung volumes and regional ventilation homogeneity. Volume-limited SI increased heart-rate and arterial pressure faster than pressure-limited SI lambs, but no differences were observed after 30 s. Volume-limited SI had increased arterial-alveolar oxygen difference due to higher FiO2 at 15 min (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02 respectively). No other inter-group differences in arterial or cerebral oxygenation, blood pressures or early markers of lung injury were evident. CONCLUSION: With the exception of inferior oxygenation, a sustained inflation targeting delivery to preterm lambs of 15 mL/kg volume by 5 s did not influence physiological variables or early markers of lung inflammation and injury at 15 min compared to a standard pressure-limited sustained inflation

Histologic chorioamnionitis and severity of illness in very low birth weight newborns.

OBJECTIVE: Estimating the risk of in-hospital mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit provides important information for health care providers, and several neonatal illness severity scores have been developed. Histologic chorioamnionitis (HCA) is a known cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. To date, the relationship between HCA and neonatal illness severity scores has not been rigorously tested. In this study, the relationships among HCA, initial illness severity, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed in very low birth weight (VLBW) newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: A total of 116 VLBW inborn infants (gestational age, 28.1 +/- 2.82 wks; birth weight, 1009 +/- 312 g) were categorized as HCA-positive (n = 67) and HCA-negative (n = 49). INTERVENTIONS: Placental histology was performed to identify HCA. Illness severity evaluation included several different neonatal illness severity scores-Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB), CRIB-II, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (SNAP-II), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPE-II)-as well as the recording of severe morbidity and in-hospital mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HCA-positive VLBW newborns showed significantly lower gestational age (p 5 (odds ratio [OR], 21.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.24-73.21); CRIB-II > 10 (OR, 56.17; 95% CI, 6.75-467.2); SNAP-II > 22 (OR, 43.05; 95% CI, 11.9-155.7), and SNAPPE-II > 42 (OR, 48.95; 95% CI, 10.18-235.4) (all p values <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that HCA is a major predictor of morbidity and mortality in VLBW newborns