Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Estimation of allele frequency is of fundamental importance in population genetic analyses and in association mapping. In most studies using next-generation sequencing, a cost effective approach is to use medium or low-coverage data (e.g., < 15<it>X</it>). However, SNP calling and allele frequency estimation in such studies is associated with substantial statistical uncertainty because of varying coverage and high error rates.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We evaluate a new maximum likelihood method for estimating allele frequencies in low and medium coverage next-generation sequencing data. The method is based on integrating over uncertainty in the data for each individual rather than first calling genotypes. This method can be applied to directly test for associations in case/control studies. We use simulations to compare the likelihood method to methods based on genotype calling, and show that the likelihood method outperforms the genotype calling methods in terms of: (1) accuracy of allele frequency estimation, (2) accuracy of the estimation of the distribution of allele frequencies across neutrally evolving sites, and (3) statistical power in association mapping studies. Using real re-sequencing data from 200 individuals obtained from an exon-capture experiment, we show that the patterns observed in the simulations are also found in real data.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Overall, our results suggest that association mapping and estimation of allele frequencies should not be based on genotype calling in low to medium coverage data. Furthermore, if genotype calling methods are used, it is usually better not to filter genotypes based on the call confidence score.</p

Single crystal structural characterization of trichlorotetrapyridylbismuth(III) and its pyridine solvate

Pentagonal bipyramidal (C5H5N)4BiCl3 and its pyridine solvate are reported. The (C5H5N)4BiCl3 complex exhibits both intra- and intermolecular - stacking, while the pyridine solvate does not, but does contain four formula units in the asymmetric unit. A comparison between the coordination geometry of these solvation isomers and a series of isostructural lanthanide complexes is discussed