Settling into an Increasingly Hostile World: The Rapidly Closing “Recruitment Window” for Corals

Free space is necessary for larval recruitment in all marine benthic communities. Settling corals, with limited energy to invest in competitive interactions, are particularly vulnerable during settlement into well-developed coral reef communities. This situation may be exacerbated for corals settling into coral-depauperate reefs where succession in nursery microhabitats moves rapidly toward heterotrophic organisms inhospitable to settling corals. To study effects of benthic organisms (at millimeter to centimeter scales) on newly settled corals and their survivorship we deployed terra-cotta coral settlement plates at 10 m depth on the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef in Belize and monitored them for 38 mo. During the second and third years, annual recruitment rates declined by over 50% from the previous year. Invertebrate crusts (primarily sponges) were absent at the start of the experiment but increased in abundance annually from 39, 60, to 73% of the plate undersides by year three. Subsequently, substrates hospitable to coral recruitment, including crustose coralline algae, biofilmed terra-cotta and polychaete tubes, declined. With succession, substrates upon which spat settled shifted toward organisms inimical to survivorship. Over 50% of spat mortality was due to overgrowth by sponges alone. This result suggests that when a disturbance creates primary substrate a “recruitment window” for settling corals exists from approximately 9 to 14 mo following the disturbance. During the window, early-succession, facilitating species are most abundant. The window closes as organisms hostile to coral settlement and survivorship overgrow nursery microhabitats

Bacterial Acquisition in Juveniles of Several Broadcast Spawning Coral Species

Coral animals harbor diverse microorganisms in their tissues, including archaea, bacteria, viruses, and zooxanthellae. The extent to which coral-bacterial associations are specific and the mechanisms for their maintenance across generations in the environment are unknown. The high diversity of bacteria in adult coral colonies has made it challenging to identify species-specific patterns. Localization of bacteria in gametes and larvae of corals presents an opportunity for determining when bacterial-coral associations are initiated and whether they are dynamic throughout early development. This study focuses on the early onset of bacterial associations in the mass spawning corals Montastraea annularis, M. franksi, M. faveolata, Acropora palmata, A. cervicornis, Diploria strigosa, and A. humilis. The presence of bacteria and timing of bacterial colonization was evaluated in gametes, swimming planulae, and newly settled polyps by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using general eubacterial probes and laser-scanning confocal microscopy. The coral species investigated in this study do not appear to transmit bacteria via their gametes, and bacteria are not detectable in or on the corals until after settlement and metamorphosis. This study suggests that mass-spawning corals do not acquire, or are not colonized by, detectable numbers of bacteria until after larval settlement and development of the juvenile polyp. This timing lays the groundwork for developing and testing new hypotheses regarding general regulatory mechanisms that control bacterial colonization and infection of corals, and how interactions among bacteria and juvenile polyps influence the structure of bacterial assemblages in corals

Recruitment Constraints in Singapore's Fluted Giant Clam (Tridacna squamosa) Populations - A Dispersal Model Approach

10.1371/journal.pone.0058819PLoS ONE83

An Indo-Pacific coral spawning database.

The discovery of multi-species synchronous spawning of scleractinian corals on the Great Barrier Reef in the 1980s stimulated an extraordinary effort to document spawning times in other parts of the globe. Unfortunately, most of these data remain unpublished which limits our understanding of regional and global reproductive patterns. The Coral Spawning Database (CSD) collates much of these disparate data into a single place. The CSD includes 6178 observations (3085 of which were unpublished) of the time or day of spawning for over 300 scleractinian species in 61 genera from 101 sites in the Indo-Pacific. The goal of the CSD is to provide open access to coral spawning data to accelerate our understanding of coral reproductive biology and to provide a baseline against which to evaluate any future changes in reproductive phenology

Reproductive seasonality in an equatorial assemblage of scleractinian corals

[Extract] Multi-specific, synchronous spawning of scleractinian corals was first documented on Australia’s Great Barrier\ud Reef (GBR) in the early 1980s (Harrison et al. 1984). There, over a period of eight nights in late spring, at\ud least 133 coral species released their gametes for external\ud fertilisation and more than 30 species spawned on the same night on one reef (Willis et al. 1985; Babcock et al. 1986). However, the causal factors responsible for this\ud remarkable phenomenon are still not clearly understood\ud (see review in Harrison and Wallace 1990). Comparisons of reproductive patterns—from sites at a variety of latitudes,\ud with contrasting seasonal and environmental conditions—can help to elucidate the ‘‘ultimate’’ causes of reproductive seasonality and synchrony (Oliver et al. 1988). Early examples of such comparisons showed that multi-species reproductive synchrony is not a characteristic of all coral communities (Richmond and Hunter 1990). In particular, studies in parts of the Red Sea and the Caribbean found that corals at those sites tended to spawn asynchronously (Shlesinger and Loya 1984; Szmant 1986). This lack of synchrony was attributed to a reduction in environmental seasonality and a narrowing in the ranges of certain environmental parameters, in particular annual sea surface temperatures (Richmond and Hunter 1990) and tidal amplitudes (the difference between mean low water springs and mean high water springs) (Oliver et al. 1988)