Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To evaluate a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists introduced as part of the national quality assurance programme. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 144 radiologists were invited to complete a test-set of 60 screening mammograms (20 malignancies). Participants assigned findings such as location, lesion type and BI-RADS. We determined areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC), case and lesion sensitivity and specificity, agreement (kappa) and correlation between reader characteristics and case sensitivity (Spearman correlation coefficients). RESULTS: A total of 110 radiologists completed the test (76%). Participants read a median number of 10,000 screening mammograms/year. Median AUC value was 0.93, case and lesion sensitivity was 91% and case specificity 94%. We found substantial agreement for recall (kappa = 0.77) and laterality (kappa = 0.80), moderate agreement for lesion type (kappa = 0.57) and BI-RADS (kappa = 0.45) and no correlation between case sensitivity and reader characteristics. CONCLUSION: Areas under the ROC curve, case sensitivity and lesion sensitivity were satisfactory and recall agreement was substantial. However, agreement in lesion type and BI-RADS could be improved; further education might be aimed at reducing interobserver variation in interpretation and description of abnormalities. We offered individual feedback on interpretive performance and overall feedback at group level. Future research will determine whether performance has improved. KEY POINTS: * We introduced and evaluated a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists. * ROC curves, case and lesion sensitivity and recall agreement were all satisfactory. * Agreement in BI-RADS interpretation and description of abnormalities could be improved. * These are areas that should be targeted with further education and training. * We offered individual feedback on interpretative performance and overall group feedback

Trends in delayed breast cancer diagnosis after recall at screening mammography

Contains fulltext : 231630.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access

[Diagnostics in clinically occult, radiologically suspect breast lesions more often surgery than needle diagnostics with image monitoring]

OBJECTIVE: To inventory the diagnostic methods used in patients with clinically occult, radiologically suspect breast lesions. DESIGN: Enquiry. METHOD: The departments of radiology of all Dutch hospitals were sent a list in January 2000 containing questions concerning the number of thread localizations in 1999 and the use of cytological or histological needle diagnostics with image monitoring prior to surgical intervention in clinically occult, radiologically suspect breast lesions. Of the 120 questionnaires mailed, 74 (62%) were completed and returned by clinics throughout the country. RESULTS: Fifty-one of the 74 hospitals (69%) had prior to operation carried out histological or cytological examinations and in these 51 hospitals this was done in 1743 of the 2857 lesions (61%): fine-needle aspiration cytology was performed in 1046 (/1743 = 60%; /4140 lesions in all 74 hospitals = 25%) and/or histological needle biopsy in 784 (45%; /4140 = 19%). CONCLUSION: In less than half of all non-palpable breast abnormalities non-surgical methods of diagnosis are used, histological needle biopsy less often than fine needle aspiration cytology

Optoacoustic imaging of the breast: correlation with histopathology and histopathologic biomarkers

Contains fulltext : 215682.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)AIM: This study was conducted in order to investigate the role of gray-scale ultrasound (US) and optoacoustic imaging combined with gray-scale ultrasound (OA/US) to better differentiate between breast cancer molecular subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 67 malignant masses included in the Maestro trial were retrospectively reviewed to compare US and OA/US feature scores and histopathological findings. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the relationship between US and OA/US features and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. If a significant relationship was found, additional Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify the differences between molecular subtype groups. RESULTS: US sound transmission helped to differentiate between LUMA and LUMB, LUMB and TNBC, and LUMB and all other molecular subtypes combined (p values < 0.05). Regarding OA/US features, the sum of internal features helped to differentiate between TNBC and HER2-enriched subtypes (p = 0.049). Internal vessels (p = 0.025), sum of all internal features (p = 0.019), and sum of internal and external features (p = 0.028) helped to differentiate between LUMA and LUMB. All internal features, the sum of all internal features, the sum of all internal and external features, and the ratio of internal and external features helped to differentiate between LUMA and TNBC. The same features also helped to differentiate between LUMA and TNBC from other molecular subtypes (p values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of OA/US might help radiologists to better differentiate between breast cancer molecular subtypes. Further studies need to be carried out in order to validate these results. KEY POINTS: * The combination of functional and morphologic information provided by optoacoustic imaging (OA) combined with gray-scale US helped to differentiate between breast cancer molecular subtypes

Utility of Supplemental Training to Improve Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening: A Literature Review

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 +/- 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice

Utility of Supplemental Training to Improve Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening: A Literature Review

PURPOSE: The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 +/- 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice

Small size ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Predictors of positive margins after local excision

One of the most important predictors of local recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is margin status. The aim was to study the association between margin status and clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics and to determine predictors of positive margins after local excision of small size (:54 cm) DCIS. Data were tested for differences regarding margin status, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors of margin status. The population consisted of 105 cases. Overall, 51 cases (49%) had free margins and 54 cases (51%) had positive margins. Positive margins were more often associated with a mean mammographic tumor size of 2.1 cm (P = 0.044) and absence of fine granular calcifications (P = 0.004). Also, high-grade (P = 0.013) and a mean pathological size of 3.2 cm (P < 0.001) were associated with positive margins. The only independent predictor of margin status was pathological grade (P = 0.010)