Baseline MDCT findings after prosthetic heart valve implantation provide important complementary information to echocardiography for follow-up purposes

Objectives: Recent studies have proposed additional multidetector-row CT (MDCT) for prosthetic heart valve (PHV) dysfunction. References to discriminate physiological from pathological conditions early after implantation are lacking. We present baseline MDCT findings of PHVs 6 weeks post implantation. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled and TTE was performed according to clinical guidelines. 256-MDCT images were systematically assessed for leaflet excursions, image quality, valve-related artefacts, and pathological and additional findings. Results: Forty-six patients were included comprising 33 mechanical and 16 biological PHVs. Overall, MDCT image quality was good and relevant regions remained reliably assessable despite mild-moderate PHV-artefacts. MDCT detected three unexpected valve-related pathology cases: (1) prominent subprosthetic tissue, (2) pseudoaneurysm and (3) extensive pseudoaneurysms and valve dehiscence. The latter patient required valve surgery to be redone. TTE only showed trace periprosthetic regurgitation, and no abnormalities in the other cases. Additional findings were: tilted aortic PHV position (n = 3), pericardial haematoma (n = 3) and pericardial effusion (n = 3). Periaortic induration was present in 33/40 (83 %) aortic valve patients. Conclusions: MDCT allowed evaluation of relevant PHV regions in all valves, revealed baseline postsurgical findings and, despite normal TTE findings, detected three cases of unexpected, clinically relevant pathology. Key Points: • Postoperative MDCT presents baseline morphology relevant for prosthetic valve follow-up. • 83 % of patients show periaortic induration 6 weeks after aortic valve replacement. • MDCT detected three cases of clinically relevant pathology not found with TTE. • Valve dehiscence detection by MDCT required redo valve surgery in one patient. • MDCT is a suitable and complementary imaging tool for follow-up purposes

Are novel non-invasive imaging techniques needed in patients with suspected prosthetic heart valve endocarditis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Multimodal non-invasive imaging plays a key role in establishing a diagnosis of PHV endocarditis. The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of TTE, TEE, and MDCT in patients with (suspected) PHV endocarditis. Methods: Studies published between 1985 and 2013 were identified via search and cross-reference of PubMed/Embase databases. Studies were included if (1) they reported on the non-invasive index tests TTE, TEE, or MDCT; (2) data was provided on PHV endocarditis

Influence of transoesophageal echocardiography on therapy and prognosis in young patients with TIA or ischaemic stroke

Objective. To determine the influence of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on therapy and prognosis in patients with cryptogenic transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke under the age of 50 years

Rapportcijfers voor de hartchirurg: validiteit van waargenomen verschillen in sterfte

OBJECTIVE: To determine the possibility of comparing the mortality rates of patients operated by different heart surgeons with each other. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical information, operation data and follow-up data on 783 patients who had undergone cardiac valve replacement, were collected from the clinical records. Aortic valve replacement had been performed in 446 patients (1979-1986) and mitral valve replacement in 337 patients (1980-1990). RESULTS: The one-year mortality rate was higher among patients operated on by heart surgeon A than among patients operated on by the other heart surgeons from the same team, viz. 16.4% and 9.5%, respectively, an absolute difference of 6.9%. The 95% confidence interval of the difference was 1.7-12.9. However, it was also found that the risk profiles of these patients of surgeon A differed from those of the other patients. After multivariate correction for this difference in risk profile, the difference in mortality was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The differences in mortality observed in our study could not be attributed to difference in quality of the heart surgeons, but were related with the risk profiles of the patients operated by one of them. Thorough analysis with correction for risks is necessary for the assessment of the quality of care, if the conclusions are not to be misleadin