14 research outputs found
Acute kidney injury in cardiogenic shock. definitions, incidence, haemodynamic alterations, and mortality
Aims: To investigate the incidence, haemodynamic alterations and 90-day mortality of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cardiogenic shock. We assessed the utility of creatinine, urine output (UO) and cystatin C (CysC) definitions of AKI in prognostication. Methods and results: Cardiogenic shock patients with serial plasma samples (n = 154) from the prospective multicenter CardShock study were included in the analysis. Acute kidney injury was defined and staged according to the KDIGO criteria by creatinine (AKIcrea) and/or UO (AKIUO). CysC-based AKI (AKICysC) was defined similarly to AKIcrea. Changes in haemodynamic parameters were assessed over time from baseline until 96 h. Mean age of the study population was 66 ± 12 years and 74% were men. Median baseline creatinine was 1.12 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.87–1.54] mg/dL and CysC 1.19 (IQR 0.90–1.69) mg/L. The 90-day mortality was 38%. The incidences for AKI were: AKIcrea 31%, AKIUO 50%, and AKICysc 33%. AKIcrea [odds ratio (OR) 12.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1–36.0] and AKICysC (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–6.1), but not AKIUO, were independent predictors of mortality. However, a stricter UO cut-off of <0.3 mL/kg/h for 6 h was independently associated with 90-day mortality (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4–9.3). Development of AKI was associated with persistently elevated central venous pressure and decreased cardiac index and mean arterial pressure. Conclusions: Acute kidney injury is frequent in patients with cardiogenic shock and especially AKIcrea predicts poor outcome. The KDIGO UO criterion seems, however, rather liberal and a stricter AKI definition of UO <0.3 mL/kg/h for at least 6 h seems more useful for mortality risk prediction. Haemodynamic alterations reflecting venous congestion and hypoperfusion were associated with AKI
Design and baseline characteristics of the stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL) study (vol 16, pg 389, 2003)
Design and baseline characteristics of the stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL) study (vol 16, pg 389, 2003)
Design and baseline characteristics of the stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL) study (vol 16, pg 389, 2003)
the European trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Investigators. Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA trial).
Background Treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme
(ACE) inhibitors reduces the rate of cardiovascular events
among patients with left-ventricular dysfunction and those at
high risk of such events. We assessed whether the ACE
inhibitor perindopril reduced cardiovascular risk in a low-risk
population with stable coronary heart disease and no apparent
heart failure.
Methods We recruited patients from October, 1997, to June,
2000. 13 655 patients were registered with previous
myocardial infarction (64%), angiographic evidence of coronary
artery disease (61%), coronary revascularisation (55%), or a
positive stress test only (5%). After a run-in period of 4 weeks,
in which all patients received perindopril, 12 218 patients
were randomly assigned perindopril 8 mg once daily (n=6110),
or matching placebo (n=6108). The mean follow-up was
4·2 years, and the primary endpoint was cardiovascular death,
myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest. Analysis was by
intention to treat.
Findings Mean age of patients was 60 years (SD 9), 85% were
male, 92% were taking platelet inhibitors, 62% blockers, and
58% lipid-lowering therapy. 603 (10%) placebo and 488 (8%)
perindopril patients experienced the primary endpoint, which
yields a 20% relative risk reduction (95% CI 9–29, p=0·0003)
with perindopril. These benefits were consistent in all
predefined subgroups and secondary endpoints. Perindopril
was well tolerated.
Interpretation Among patients with stable coronary heart
disease without apparent heart failure, perindopril can
significantly improve outcome. About 50 patients need to be
treated for a period of 4 years to prevent one major
cardiovascular event. Treatment with perindopril, on top of
other preventive medications, should be considered in all
patients with coronary heart disease
Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study)
BACKGROUND: Treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduces the rate of cardiovascular events among patients with left-ventricular dysfunction and those at high risk of such events. We assessed whether the ACE inhibitor perindopril reduced cardiovascular risk in a low-risk population with stable coronary heart disease and no apparent heart failure. METHODS: We recruited patients from October, 1997, to June, 2000. 13655 patients were registered with previous myocardial infarction (64%), angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (61%), coronary revascularisation (55%), or a positive stress test only (5%). After a run-in period of 4 weeks, in which all patients received perindopril, 12218 patients were randomly assigned perindopril 8 mg once daily (n=6110), or matching placebo (n=6108). The mean follow-up was 4.2 years, and the primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Mean age of patients was 60 years (SD 9), 85% were male, 92% were taking platelet inhibitors, 62% beta blockers, and 58% lipid-lowering therapy. 603 (10%) placebo and 488 (8%) perindopril patients experienced the primary endpoint, which yields a 20% relative risk reduction (95% CI 9-29, p=0.0003) with perindopril. These benefits were consistent in all predefined subgroups and secondary endpoints. Perindopril was well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Among patients with stable coronary heart disease without apparent heart failure, perindopril can significantly improve outcome. About 50 patients need to be treated for a period of 4 years to prevent one major cardiovascular event. Treatment with perindopril, on top of other preventive medications, should be considered in all patients with coronary heart disease
Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes.
Background
This study was undertaken to determine whether use of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren would reduce cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 dia- betes and chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or both.
Methods
In a double-blind fashion, we randomly assigned 8561 patients to aliskiren (300 mg daily) or placebo as an adjunct to an angiotensin-converting\u2013enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker. The primary end point was a composite of the time to cardiovascular death or a first occurrence of cardiac arrest with resuscitation; nonfatal myocardial infarction; nonfatal stroke; unplanned hospitalization for heart failure; end-stage renal disease, death attributable to kidney failure, or the need for renal-replacement therapy with no dialysis or transplantation available or initiated; or doubling of the baseline serum creatinine level.
Results
The trial was stopped prematurely after the second interim efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 32.9 months, the primary end point had occurred in 783 patients (18.3%) assigned to aliskiren as compared with 732 (17.1%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.20; P=0.12). Effects on secondary renal end points were similar. Systolic and diastolic blood pres- sures were lower with aliskiren (between-group differences, 1.3 and 0.6 mm Hg, respectively) and the mean reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was greater (between-group difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17). The proportion of patients with hyperkalemia (serum potassium level, 656 mmol per liter) was significantly higher in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group (11.2% vs. 7.2%), as was the proportion with reported hypotension (12.1% vs. 8.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons).
Conclusions
The addition of aliskiren to standard therapy with renin\u2013angiotensin system block- ade in patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events is not supported by these data and may even be harmful
Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine whether use of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren would reduce cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or both.
METHODS: In a double-blind fashion, we randomly assigned 8561 patients to aliskiren (300 mg daily) or placebo as an adjunct to an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker. The primary end point was a composite of the time to cardiovascular death or a first occurrence of cardiac arrest with resuscitation; nonfatal myocardial infarction; nonfatal stroke; unplanned hospitalization for heart failure; end-stage renal disease, death attributable to kidney failure, or the need for renal-replacement therapy with no dialysis or transplantation available or initiated; or doubling of the baseline serum creatinine level.
RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the second interim efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 32.9 months, the primary end point had occurred in 783 patients (18.3%) assigned to aliskiren as compared with 732 (17.1%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.20; P=0.12). Effects on secondary renal end points were similar. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with aliskiren (between-group differences, 1.3 and 0.6 mm Hg, respectively) and the mean reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was greater (between-group difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17). The proportion of patients with hyperkalemia (serum potassium level, 656 mmol per liter) was significantly higher in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group (11.2% vs. 7.2%), as was the proportion with reported hypotension (12.1% vs. 8.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aliskiren to standard therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockade in patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events is not supported by these data and may even be harmful
Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes
BACKGROUND
Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activated–receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits
thrombin-induced platelet activation.
METHODS
In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with
placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment
elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes,
myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent
coronary revascularization.
RESULTS
Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up
of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031
of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo
(Kaplan–Meier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P = 0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes,
myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group
versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89;
95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P = 0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the
vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58;
P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard
ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events
were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard
therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly
increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage