5 research outputs found
ΠΠΠ€ΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠΠ«Π ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π Π£ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠ«Π₯ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠ«Π₯ ΠΠΠΠ¨ΠΠ’ΠΠΠ¬Π‘Π’Π Π£ ΠΠΠΠ¬ΠΠ«Π₯ Π ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ«. ΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ Π‘ΠΠ£Π§ΠΠ―
Introduction. Currently, there is no global consensus regarding the management of breast cancer patients with implant-associated infections. Some studies clearly recommend their removal and surgical debridement with consecutive antimicrobial treatment, while others prefer long-term antibacterial therapy (at least 1 month) with the effectiveness of such conservative approach of 36β73 %.Case description. A 43-year-old patient suffering from brca1-positive right breast cancer t2n0m0 (invasive carcinoma of non-specific type g3, er β 8, pgr β 0, her-2/neu β 0, ki67 (%) β less than 20 %), underwent radical skin-preserving mastectomy on the right with simultaneous implant reconstruction and preventive subcutaneous mastectomy on the left with simultaneous implant reconstruction. Peri-implant infection in the left breast was observed on the 21st day after surgery.Results. The patient received empirical therapy with cefepim. Microbiological examination of the punctate revealed the causative agent of infection β methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) (1Γ105cfu/ml). Daptomycin 6 mg/kg/day was added to therapy. After 8 weeks, the patient received oral moxifloxacin 400 once daily, for another 3 weeks. A complete response was achieved. The patient has no signs of infection for 3 years.Conclusion. Long-term etiotropic antibacterial therapy with daptomycin followed by oral moxifloxacin resulted in a stable clinical effect.ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π² ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Ρ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΊ Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ-Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ. Π ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ c ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, Π² Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
β ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ (Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 1 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ), ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ 36β73 %.ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ 43 Π»Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΡΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ BRCa1-ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ t2n0M0 (ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° G3, eR β 8, PgR β 0, Her-2/neu β 0, Ki67 (%) β ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 20 %), Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π° Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π²Π° Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ. Π½Π° 21-Π΅ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π±ΡΠ» Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ β ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΠΈΠ½-ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊ (MRSA) Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ 1Γ105ΠΊΠΠ/ΠΌΠ». ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ» Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ 6 ΠΌΠ³/ΠΊΠ³/ΡΡΡ. Π§Π΅ΡΠ΅Π· 8 Π½Π΅Π΄ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠ° Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½ 400 ΠΌΠ³ 1 ΡΠ°Π· Π² ΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° Π΅ΡΠ΅ 3 Π½Π΅Π΄. Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 3 Π»Π΅Ρ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ½Π°Ρ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ Π°Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
PRIMARY SYNOVIAL CHONDROMATOSIS OF THE SHOULDER (CASE REPORT)
Primary synovial chondromatosis of a shoulder is quite rare in clinical practice. The diagnostics of this pathology has to include the histological examination of intraarticular material to detect the signs of tissue malignant transformation. Currently surgical intervention of this disease involves the removal of intra-articular cartilaginous bodies and local synovectomy of the affected joint by arthroscopic or open methods. The authors describe the clinical, histologic and arthroscopic features of primary synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder in order to assess the possibility of its minimally invasive correction. The clinical example of diagnostics and treatment of patient with this pathology was presented
LONG-TERM RESULTS OF ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR INSTABILITY AT RECURRENT SHOULDER JOINT, CAUSES OF FAILURE
The authors analyse the results of the performance of arthroscopy stitch on the injured capsule with the use of anchor on 46 patients with anterior recurring instability of the shoulder joint within a period of time from 6 months to 4 years. When assessing the results of the given treatment, functional scales, clinical examination methods and radiological methods have been used. The article presents the results of arthroscopy diagnosis of the interior joint damage accompanying the recurring instability ofΒ the shoulder joint. The effectiveness of the conducted operations was 93,5%. The occurrence of postoperative relapses of joint instability (reoccurring dislocations) in 3 patients (6,5%) was caused by the presence of significant damage of bone formations in the shoulder joint β the shoulder-blade joint socket and the shoulder-bone head as well as the reduction of the strength and elasticity of the soft-tissue structures
ARTHROSCOPY POSSIBILITIES IN TREATMENT OF INJURIES OF THE SHOULDER ROTATOR CUFF
The authors analyzed the results of arthroscopic treatment 58 patients with various injuries of rotator cuff. Follow-up was from 4 months to 3 years (average 18 Β± 5,2 months) after surgery. The quantitative MRI characteristics allowing to define prognostically unfavorable variants of rotator cuff surgery are presented. The authors considered the ways out of such situations including the partial restoration of the rotator cuff structures by arthroscopic method and reverse shoulder arthroplasty