15 research outputs found

    Dach: Genomic Characterization, Evaluation As A Candidate For Postaxial Polydactyly Type A2, And Developmental Expression Pattern Of The Mouse Homologue

    No full text
    The gene DACH is a human homologue of Drosophila melanogaster dachshund (dac), which encodes a nuclear factor essential for determining cell fates in the eye, leg, and nervous system of the fly. To investigate possible connections between DACH and inherited developmental disorders, we have characterized the human DACH genomic structure and investigated the tissue and cellular distribution of the mouse DACH1 protein during development. DACH spans 400 kb and is encoded by 12 exons. The predominant DACH transcript is 5.2 kb and encodes a 706-amino-acid protein with an observed molecular weight of 97 kDa. DACH mRNA was defected in multiple adult human tissues including kidney and heart. The mouse DACH1 protein was immunolocalized to specific cell types within the developing kidneys, eyes, cochleae, and limb buds. Data suggest genetic linkage of the limb bud patterning defect postaxial polydactyly type A (designated PAP-A2, MIM 602085) to a 28-cM interval on chromosome 13 that includes DACH. However, mutation analysis of DACH in this PAP-A2 pedigree revealed no sequence differences in the coding region, splice sites, or proximal promoter region. The data presented will allow for the analysis of DACH as a candidate for other developmental disorders affecting the limbs, kidneys, eyes, ears, and other sites of DACH expression.Wo

    Personalized detection of circulating tumor DNA antedates breast cancer metastatic recurrence

    No full text
    Purpose: Up to 30% of patients with breast cancer relapse after primary treatment. There are no sensitive and reliable tests to monitor these patients and detect distant metastases before overt recurrence. Here, we demonstrate the use of personalized circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling for detection of recurrence in breast cancer. Experimental Design: Forty-nine primary patients with breast cancer were recruited following surgery and adjuvant therapy. Plasma samples (n = 208) were collected every 6 months for up to 4 years. Personalized assays targeting 16 variants selected from primary tumor whole-exome data were tested in serial plasma for the presence of ctDNA by ultradeep sequencing (average >100,000X). Results: Plasma ctDNA was detected ahead of clinical or radiologic relapse in 16 of the 18 relapsed patients (sensitivity of 89%); metastatic relapse was predicted with a lead time of up to 2 years (median, 8.9 months; range, 0.5–24.0 months). None of the 31 nonrelapsing patients were ctDNA-positive at any time point across 156 plasma samples (specificity of 100%). Of the two relapsed patients who were not detected in the study, the first had only a local recurrence, whereas the second patient had bone recurrence and had completed chemotherapy just 13 days prior to blood sampling. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that patient-specific ctDNA analysis can be a sensitive and specific approach for disease surveillance for patients with breast cancer. More importantly, earlier detection of up to 2 years provides a possible window for therapeutic intervention
    corecore