20 research outputs found

    Gene Expression Profile of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Innately Resistant to Imatinib

    No full text
    Background. Most chronic myeloid leukemia patients who receive imatinib as first line-terapy will obtain, after 12 months treatment, complete cytogenetic and molecular response . However several cases will not achieve molecular response, but their innate mechanism(s) of resistance remain poorly understood. We tried to explore the molecular events involved in innate resistance in CML. Study design. Five patients who were molecular “non responder” and seven “major” responder were investigated by using the expression profile of a set of 380 genes. Multiple testing procedure (MTP), Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM), Empirical Bayes Analysis of Microarrays (EBAM), False Discovery Rate (FDR) and support vector machine with linear kernel (SVM-RFE) were used for comparative analysis. Results. 323/380 genes (85%) were overexpressed in the non responder group compared with the responder ones. Following a very stringent statistical analysis, comprensive of all analysis used, a list of 26 genes was identified, in which overexpression in non-responders was highly statistically significant. These genes are involved in signal trasduction and transcription factors, apoptosis, cell adhesion and cycle progression. Discriminative power of proposed gene set was estimated by two different statistical methods which yielded a correct prediction of the drug response for each patient used as test sample. Conclusion. Our study identified a set of twenty-six genes involved in resistance to imatinib, which may be used as clinical predictors or therapeutic targets. We consider some of them of particular interest: IGFBP2, CDC37; MAPK3, ETS1, PEA15. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as genome-wide promoter hypomethilation, may be involved as the basic mechanism for innate resistance in CML

    Second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a multicenter survey of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale on the activity and safety of the FOLFOX4 regimen in clinical practice.

    No full text
    Background: In daily clinical practice second-line chemotherapy (SLCT) is frequently given to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer failing gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy without solid scientific support. Patients and methods: A retrospective survey was carried out including 42 patients. Patients received standard FOLFOX4 regimen biweekly until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Six partial responses (14%) and 16 stabilizations (38%) were recorded for a tumor growth control rate of 57%. The median time to progression (TtP) was 4 months (range 1–7 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 months (range 2–9 months). A stabilization of performance status (PS) and a subjective improvement of cancer-related symptoms were recorded in 27 patients. Conclusions: Data presented in this paper support the use of FOLFOX4 regimen in the second-line treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas patients. The use of SLCT, however, should be carefully proposed to patients with good PS or those who had a good response to first-line therapy
    corecore