Diagnostic accuracy of the primary care screener for affective disorder (PC-SAD) in primary care

Background: Depression goes often unrecognised and untreated in non-psychiatric medical settings. Screening has recently gained acceptance as a first step towards improving depression recognition and management. The Primary Care Screener for Affective Disorders (PC-SAD) is a self-administered questionnaire to screen for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Dysthymic Disorder (Dys) which has a sophisticated scoring algorithm that confers several advantages. This study tested its performance against a ‘gold standard’ diagnostic interview in primary care. Methods: A total of 416 adults attending 13 urban general internal medicine primary care practices completed the PC-SAD. Of 409 who returned a valid PC-SAD, all those scoring positive (N=151) and a random sample (N=106) of those scoring negative were selected for a 3-month telephone follow-up assessment including the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) by a psychiatrist who was masked to PC-SAD results. Results: Most selected patients (N=212) took part in the follow-up assessment. After adjustment for partial verification bias the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for MDD were 90%, 83%, 51%, and 98%. For Dys, the corresponding figures were 78%, 79%, 8%, and 88%. Conclusions: While some study limitations suggest caution in interpreting our results, this study corroborated the diagnostic validity of the PC-SAD, although the low PPV may limit its usefulness with regard to Dys. Given its good psychometric properties and the short average administration time, the PC-SAD might be the screening instrument of choice in settings where the technology for computer automated scoring is available

T-cell subpopulations in pediatric healthy children: age-normal values.

Assessment of the percentage and absolute number of T cells as well as of their main subpopulations is presently a routine procedure for the diagnosis and follow-up of a wide array of pediatric immunologic disorders. For several clinical applications (severe immunodeficiencies or leukaemias) the diagnostic usefulness of their enumeration does not require close comparison with age normal values, while in other circumstances such as follow-up of immunomodulating or immunosuppressive treatments or detection of minor immune defects, the expected changes of T cell subsets are more subtile and they are likely to be detected only by comparison with well-defined age normal values. In the present study CD3, CD4 and CD8 positive cells were enumerated in a group of 410 healthy children of age ranging from 30 days to 9 years. No significant changes in percentage or absolute number were observed during infancy and childhood. Furthermore the sum of CD4 and CD8 positive cells was close to the percentage of CD3 positive cells, suggesting a phenotype maturity of T cells from infancy

Acute psychiatric treatment and the use of physical restraint in first-generation immigrants in Italy: A prospective concurrent study

Background and Aims: Immigrants in Europe appear at higher risk of psychiatric coercive interventions. No studies have investigated this issue in Italy. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of physical restraint, compulsory admission and other treatment characteristics differ in immigrated and Italian-born patients admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit. Methods: One hundred first-generation immigrant patients were compared to 100 age-, gender- and diagnosis-matched Italian-born patients. Subjects were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR and rated on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning. Clinical data and treatment characteristics were collected. Results: Immigrant patients were more likely to be physically restrained as compared to Italian-born patients (11% vs 3%; (2) = 4.92; p = 0.027; RR = 3.67; 95% CI = 1.05-12.7). No differences in the proportion of involuntary treatment were found. Immigrant patients did not receive higher doses of antipsychotics or benzodiazepines, but they had a longer stay in the hospital. Conclusions: The higher rate of physical restraint among migrants may reflect cultural, ethnic and language differences leading to communication problems between immigrant patients and mental health professionals. Since coercive interventions can be harmful, specific strategies to prevent this phenomenon in immigrants are needed