30 research outputs found
The inhibitory effect of a drug combination on the development of mefloquine resistance in<i>Plasmodium berghei</i>
ChemInform Abstract: STOFFWECHSELPRODUKTE VON MIKROORGANISMEN 89. MITT. SYNTH. VON ZWEI DIASTEREOMEREN 2,4,6-TRIMETHYL-PIMELINSAEUREN, BEITRAG ZUR STEREOCHEMIE DES BORRELIDINS
Removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions : Consequences for plant optimization
Antimalarial immunity in Saimiri monkeys. Immunization with surface components of asexual blood stages.
Removal of Estrogens in Municipal Wastewater Treatment under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions: Consequences for Plant Optimization
The removal of estrogens (estrone E1, estradiol E2, and
ethinylestradiol EE2) was studied in various municipal
wastewater treatment processes equipped for nutrient
removal. A biological degradation model is formulated, and
kinetic parameters are evaluated with batch experiments
under various redox conditions. The resulting model
calculations are then compared with sampling campaigns
performed on different types of full-scale plant: conventional
activated-sludge treatment, a membrane bioreactor, and a
fixed-bed reactor. The results show a >90% removal of
all estrogens in the activated sludge processes. (Due to the
analytical quantification limit and low influent concentrations,
however, this removal efficiency represents only an
observable minimum.) The removal efficiencies of 77%
and ≥90% for E1 and E2, respectively, in the fixed-bed
reactor represent a good performance in view of the short
hydraulic retention time of 35 min. The first-order removal-rate constant in batch experiments observed for E2
varied from 150 to 950 d-1 for a 1 gSS L-1 sludge suspension.
The removal efficiency of E1 and EE2 clearly depends on
the redox conditions, the maximum removal rate occurring
under aerobic conditions when E1 was reduced to E2.
Sampling campaigns on full-scale plants indicate that the
kinetic values identified in batch experiments (without
substrate addition) for the natural estrogens may overestimate
the actual removal rates. Although this paper does not
give direct experimental evidence, it seems that the substrate
present in the raw influent competitively inhibits the
degradation of E1 and E2. These compounds are therefore
removed mainly in activated sludge compartments with
low substrate loading. Theoretical evaluation leads us to
expect that diffusive mass transfer inside the floc (but not
across the laminar boundary layer) appreciably influences
the observed degradation rates of E1 and E2, but not of EE2
