2 research outputs found
Explaining the Nanoscale Effect in the Upconversion Dynamics of β‑NaYF<sub>4</sub>:Yb<sup>3+</sup>, Er<sup>3+</sup> Core and Core–Shell Nanocrystals
Nanocrystals
of β-NaYF<sub>4</sub>:Yb<sup>3+</sup>, Er<sup>3+</sup> generally
have lower NIR-to-visible upconversion (UC) internal
quantum efficiency, IQE, compared to high-quality bulk materials,
and exhibit more rapid UC dynamics, typical of quenching, when excited
with a pulsed source near 980 nm. The addition of a protective shell
increases the IQE of the nanocrystals and slows the overall excited-state
dynamics. Here, we show that an extension of a recently developed
model for UC in powders of micron-sized β-NaYF<sub>4</sub>:18%Yb<sup>3+</sup>, 2%Er<sup>3+</sup> crystals correctly predicts the time-resolved
luminescence curve shapes, relative intensities, and observed drop
in IQE of the various emission lines for core and core–shell
nanoparticles following pulsed excitation. The model clearly shows
that the nanoscale effect on visible upconversion luminescence in
these materials, with typical high-Yb<sup>3+</sup> and low-Er<sup>3+</sup> doping, is largely due to rapid energy migration among Yb<sup>3+</sup>(<sup>2</sup>F<sub>5/2</sub>) and Er<sup>3+</sup>(<sup>4</sup>I<sub>11/2</sub>) ions at the 1 μm energy level, such that
an equilibrium is achieved between interior sites and rapidly relaxing
surface sites. The faster kinetics observed in visible emission following
pulsed NIR excitation is mainly a propagation of the effect of surface
quenching of the 1 μm reservoir states and is not due to direct
quenching of the visible emitting states themselves. For Er<sup>3+</sup> ions contributing to UC emission, the relaxation rate constants
for the blue (<sup>2</sup>H<sub>9/2</sub>), green (<sup>2</sup>H<sub>11/2</sub>, <sup>4</sup>S<sub>3/2</sub>), and red (<sup>4</sup>F<sub>9/2</sub>) emitting states are essentially unchanged from their bulk
values, indicating that Er<sup>3+</sup> ions close to the nanoparticle
surface are nearly silent with regard to UC. The addition of a passive
β-NaYF<sub>4</sub> shell retards the drain of the 1 μm
excitation reservoir and recovers the participation of outer Er<sup>3+</sup> sites in UC. The dependence of IQE on shell thickness is
well explained in terms of a Förster-type model describing
an energy donor (Er<sup>3+</sup>, Yb<sup>3+</sup>) interacting with
a thin plane layer of acceptors (oleate). The UC behavior of both
the core and the core–shell nanocrystals can be modeled, almost
quantitatively, solely on the basis of quenching at the 1 μm
level, without separate consideration of a near-surface Er<sup>3+</sup> population. However, a two-layer model for the core nanoparticles
is revealing with regard to the modest extent to which near-surface
ions do participate in UC and gives a better representation of the
detailed dynamics of the NIR emitting states. A method is presented
for allowing investigators to estimate the IQE for any nanosample
(with 18% Yb<sup>3+</sup>, 2%Er<sup>3+</sup> doping) as a function
of excitation power density (cw) or pulse-energy density based on
the low pulse energy measurement of the decay constant for the 1 μm
emission