3 research outputs found
Electrostatic Interactions versus Second Order Jahn–Teller Distortion as the Source of Structural Diversity in Li<sub>3</sub>MO<sub>4</sub> Compounds (M = Ru, Nb, Sb and Ta)
With
the advent of layered rocksalt oxides showing anionic redox
activity toward Li, there has been an increased focus on designing
new rocksalt structures and, more particularly, compounds pertaining
to the Li<sub>3</sub>MO<sub>4</sub> family. The structural richness
of this family is nested in its ability to host many different cations,
leading to the formation of superstructure patterns whose predictability
is still limited. Thus, there is a need to understand the formation
of such superstructures, as cationic arrangements have a crucial effect
on their physical properties. Herein we propose a combined experimental
and theoretical approach to understand the interactions governing
cation ordering in binary systems of general composition given by
Li<sub>3</sub>M<sub><i>y</i></sub>M′<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> (M and M′ being Ru, Nb, Sb,
and Ta). Through complementary X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption
spectroscopy techniques, we reveal a solid-solution behavior for the
Li<sub>3</sub>Ru<sub><i>y</i></sub>Sb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> system, as opposed to Li<sub>3</sub>Sb<sub><i>y</i></sub>Nb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> that enlists four rocksalt structures with different
cation orderings. We use DFT calculations to rationalize such a structural
diversity and find that it is controlled by a delicate balance between
electrostatic interactions and charge transfer due to a second order
Jahn–Teller distortion. This insight provides a new viewpoint
for understanding cationic arrangements in rocksalt structures and
guidelines to design novel phases for applications such as Li-ion
batteries or ionic conductors
The Li<sub>3</sub>Ru<sub><i>y</i></sub>Nb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> (0 ≤ <i>y</i> ≤ 1) System: Structural Diversity and Li Insertion and Extraction Capabilities
Searching
for novel high-capacity electrode materials combining
cationic and anionic redox processes is an ever-growing activity within
the field of Li-ion batteries. In this respect, we report on the exploration
of the Li<sub>3</sub>Ru<sub><i>y</i></sub>Nb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> (0 ≤ <i>y</i> ≤
1) system with an O/M ratio of 4 to maximize the number of oxygen
lone pairs, responsible for the anionic redox. We show that this system
presents a very rich crystal chemistry with the existence of four
structural types, which derive from the rocksalt structure but differ
in their cationic arrangement, creating either zigzag, helical, jagged
chains or clusters. From an electrochemical standpoint, these compounds
are active on reduction via a classical cationic insertion process.
The oxidation process is more complex, because of the instability
of the delithiated phase. Our results promote the use of the rich
Li<sub>3</sub>MO<sub>4</sub> family as a viable platform for a better
understanding of the relationships between structure and anionic redox
activity
Electrostatic Interactions versus Second Order Jahn–Teller Distortion as the Source of Structural Diversity in Li<sub>3</sub>MO<sub>4</sub> Compounds (M = Ru, Nb, Sb and Ta)
With
the advent of layered rocksalt oxides showing anionic redox
activity toward Li, there has been an increased focus on designing
new rocksalt structures and, more particularly, compounds pertaining
to the Li<sub>3</sub>MO<sub>4</sub> family. The structural richness
of this family is nested in its ability to host many different cations,
leading to the formation of superstructure patterns whose predictability
is still limited. Thus, there is a need to understand the formation
of such superstructures, as cationic arrangements have a crucial effect
on their physical properties. Herein we propose a combined experimental
and theoretical approach to understand the interactions governing
cation ordering in binary systems of general composition given by
Li<sub>3</sub>M<sub><i>y</i></sub>M′<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> (M and M′ being Ru, Nb, Sb,
and Ta). Through complementary X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption
spectroscopy techniques, we reveal a solid-solution behavior for the
Li<sub>3</sub>Ru<sub><i>y</i></sub>Sb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> system, as opposed to Li<sub>3</sub>Sb<sub><i>y</i></sub>Nb<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub> that enlists four rocksalt structures with different
cation orderings. We use DFT calculations to rationalize such a structural
diversity and find that it is controlled by a delicate balance between
electrostatic interactions and charge transfer due to a second order
Jahn–Teller distortion. This insight provides a new viewpoint
for understanding cationic arrangements in rocksalt structures and
guidelines to design novel phases for applications such as Li-ion
batteries or ionic conductors