Outcomes after transplantation for “failed” Fontan: A single-institution experience

ObjectiveDespite the excellent outcomes in the current era after the Fontan procedure, it continues to have an inherent risk of failure. Cardiac transplantation provides 1 option for treating these patients; however, the indications for, timing of, and outcomes after, transplantation remain undefined. We examined our own institutional experience with transplantation for failed Fontan.MethodsThe records of 155 patients transplanted for congenital heart disease at a single institution from June 1984 to September 2007 were reviewed. Of these patients, 43 had undergone a previous Fontan procedure (25 male, 15 female; median age, 14.5 years; range, 1–47; 23 classic Fontan, 13 lateral tunnel, 4 extracardiac conduit, and 3 revised to shunt). The predictors of short- and long-term survival were evaluated, and the Fontan patients were compared with all other patients with congenital heart disease (n = 129, 78 male, 51 female).ResultsThe most common indications for transplantation included protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) (39.5%), chronic heart failure (41.8%), and acute post-Fontan failure (9.3%). The transplants performed in Fontan patients were more likely to require pulmonary artery reconstruction (85.4% vs 42.9%; P < .0001) and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (278 vs 179 minutes; P < .0001). The 90-day mortality rate was greater in the Fontan group (35.0% vs 20.0%; P = .055). No correlation was observed between the interval from Fontan to transplantation and morality; however, renal failure was a strong predictor of early mortality (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–75.7).ConclusionsTransplantation is an acceptable treatment for patients with a failed Fontan. Clinical factors (instead of the indication for transplantation) appear to have the greatest correlation with early mortality

Heart transplantation in children with congenital heart disease

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to describe heart transplantation in children with congenital heart disease and to compare the results with those in children undergoing transplantation for other cardiac diseases.BackgroundReports describe decreased survival after heart transplantation in children with congenital heart disease compared with those with cardiomyopathy. However, transplantation is increasingly being considered in the surgical management of children with complex congenital heart disease. Present-day results from this group require reassessment.MethodsThe diagnoses, previous operations and indications for transplantation were characterized in children with congenital heart disease. Pretransplant course, graft ischemia time, posttransplant survival and outcome (rejection frequency, infection rate, length of hospital stay) were compared with those in children undergoing transplantation for other reasons (n = 47).ResultsThirty-seven children (mean [±SD] age 9 ± 6 years) with congenital heart disease underwent transplantation; 86% had undergone one or more previous operations. Repair of extracardiac defects at transplantation was necessary in 23 patients. Causes of death after transplantation were donor failure in two patients, surgical bleeding in two, pulmonary hemorrhage in one, infection in four, rejection in three and graft atherosclerosis in one. No difference in 1- and 5-year survival rates (70% vs. 77% and 64% vs. 65%, respectively), rejection frequency or length of hospital stay was seen between children with and without congenital heart disease. Cardiopulmonary bypass and donor ischemia time were significantly longer in patients with congenital heart disease. Serious infections were more common in children with than without congenital heart disease (13 of 37 vs. 6 of 47, respectively, p = 0.01).ConclusionsDespite the more complex cardiac surgery required at implantation and longer donor ischemic time, heart transplantation can be performed in children with complex congenital heart disease with success similar to that in patients with other cardiac diseases

Coding of coronary arterial origin and branching in congenital heart disease: The modified Leiden Convention

Objectives: Variations in coronary anatomy are common and may relate to the position of the coronary ostium relative to the aortic sinus, the angle of coronary take-off, or the course of the coronary arterial branches. Several classification systems have been proposed. However, they all lack a simple rationale that is applicable irrespective of the relative position of the great arteries, as well as in bicuspid aortic valves. We present a modification of a relatively simple system introduced in the early 1980s, designated the “Leiden Convention.” Methods: The first step of the Leiden Convention is that the clinician takes position in the nonfacing sinus of the aorta looking toward the pulmonary orifice. The right-hand facing sinus is sinus 1, and the left-hand facing sinus is sinus 2. The coronary branches arising from sinus 1 are annotated proceeding in a counterclockwise fashion toward sinus 2. “Usual” (normal) coronary anatomy would be 1R-2LCx. Given their clinical relevance, single sinus coronary arteries are discussed separately. Results: This system was originally designed and highly applicable in hearts with an altered great artery relationship, such as in the var

The role of enucleation with or without septal myectomy for discrete subaortic stenosis

ObjectiveSubstantial controversy persists regarding the need and efficacy of a routine myectomy in the treatment of discrete subaortic stenosis. Although some believe myectomy more effectively relieves subaortic narrowing, this is uncertain, and complications, including heart block and aortic valve injury, are concerns. The aims of the study were as follows: (1) to analyze the role of enucleation for relief of subaortic stenosis and the risk factors associated with recurrence and reoperation and (2) to delineate the characteristics of the patients who might benefit from enucleation alone.MethodsFrom January 1990 through May 2007, 221 patients with subaortic stenosis underwent biventricular repair. Of those, 106 patients had discrete subaortic stenosis. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient, as determined by means of transthoracic echocardiographic analysis, was 67.3 ± 29 mm Hg. Forty patients had previous operations for other intracardiac anomalies. Mean age at repair was 7 years. Sixty-one patients underwent isolated enucleation, and 45 patients underwent concomitant myectomy. Patients with recurrent subaortic stenosis whose first operation was performed elsewhere were excluded from analysis.ResultsThere was 1 early death and 1 late death. The postoperative peak left ventricular outflow gradient decreased to 12.5 ± 12.9 mm Hg (P < .001). No patient had development of heart block or required a pacemaker. A recurrent gradient of greater than 30 mm Hg was found in 26 (27%) patients, and 8 (7.5%) patients had reoperations. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94.7% ± 1.8%, 89.6% ± 3.5%, and 84.8% ± 4.9%, respectively.Of those patients who had not undergone a previous cardiac operation, there were no significant differences in the rates of recurrence (28% vs 27%) or reoperation (4.7% vs 4.4%) between the enucleation group and the concomitant myectomy group. For the patients who had a previous cardiac operation, the concomitant myectomy group had a significantly lower rate of recurrence (44% for enucleation vs 13% for enucleation plus myectomy, P = .031).ConclusionsFor those patients undergoing primary operations for discrete subaortic stenosis, routine myectomy does not offer superior relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; enucleation alone provides good results in this selected population. However, in those patients with associated cardiac anomalies, concomitant additional myectomy is recommended