Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Minimally Invasive Spinotomy in the Treatment of Multiple Small Benign Breast Nodules

Objective: To observe the efficacy of different surgical protocols in the management of multiple benign breast nodules. Methods: Patients diagnosed with multiple benign breast nodules from 2021.4 to 2023.2 were divided into two groups, blank and study groups, each with 51 cases, and treated with conventional open and ultrasound-guided minimally invasive rotational surgery respectively. Results: The study group had better incision diameter and VAS score at 24h postoperatively than the blank group, with significant differences (P < 0.05). Regarding the postoperative complication rate index, the study group vs. the blank group was 3.92% vs. 21.57% (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Minimally invasive spinotomy under ultrasound guidance for the treatment of patients with multiple breast nodules is safe and effective and has the potential to be used universally

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Single-Port Endoscopic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Objective: To analyze the effect of single-port endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer. Methods: The research subjects included in this study were 52 patients with early breast cancer who were admitted to our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021. They were divided into control group and experimental group by random number table method. The control group received modified radical mastectomy(26 cases), and the experimental group received single-port endoscopic breast-conserving surgery (26 cases). The treatment effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The blood loss, incision length and hospital stay in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), but the operation time was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in breast beauty between the two groups, and the experimental group was better (P<0.05). Conclusion: Single-port endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy are used in the treatment of early breast cancer, and the treatment effect of the former is significantly better than that of the latter. This treatment method can be promoted

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Globe Incision Mammaplasty in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Objective: To observe the efficacy of different methods in the treatment of early stage breast cancer disease. Methods: 84 patients admitted from 2020.12 to 2022.8 were divided into groups I and II, 42 patients each, who received treatment after conventional breast-conserving and racket-shaped incision mammoplasty, respectively, and compared the surgical treatment of patients between groups. Results: The rates of cosmetic excellence and complications in group II were 95.2% and 7.1% respectively, compared with 73.8% and 35.7% in group I. The differences reached a significant level (X² 5.825,8.556 respectively, P equals 0.016,0.003 both <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of early breast cancer patients with racket-shaped incisions for mammaplasty is cosmetically effective and safe, and is worth promoting

Application Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Microwave Ablation and Traditional Surgery for Benign Breast Nodules

Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and traditional surgery in the treatment of benign breast nodules. Methods: The research subjects included in this study were 68 patients with benign breast nodules admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2021. They were divided into control group and experimental group by random number table method. The control group received traditional surgical treatment (34 cases), and the experimental group received contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (34 cases). The treatment effects of the two groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups, which did not meet statistical significance (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, incision healing time and pain score were lower in the experimental group than in the experimental group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in postoperative hematoma, scar formation rate and lesion residual rate between the two groups, among which the experimental group was lower (P<0.05). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and traditional surgery are used in the treatment of benign breast nodules. The former is better than the latter. This treatment method can be promoted

The Value of Breast-Conserving Surgery Combined with Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

Objective: To observe the efficacy of different methods in the treatment of breast cancer disease. Methods: A sample of 78 patients attending the clinic from 2020.8 to 2023.1 was randomly selected and divided into groups A and B. Thirty-nine patients each underwent conventional breast-conserving surgery and group B combined with neoadjuvant therapy to compare the effectiveness of treatment between the groups. Results: The overall efficiency of group B vs group A was 94.87% vs 71.79%, a significant difference (P < 0.05). Surgery-related indicators were better in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Early intervention with breast-conserving surgery combined with neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for patients with breast cancer and has demonstrated high clinical value