9 research outputs found

    Reversibility of LJK-11 treatment.

    No full text
    <p>Hela cells were incubated with 50 µM LJK-11 or 20 nM colchicine for 20 hours (A) and then the compound-containing media were removed, the cells were washed with fresh media, and the cells were incubated in new compound-free media for additional 18 hours (B). The pictures were taken using a light microscope.</p

    Effect of LJK-11 on tyrosine phosphorylation of signaling proteins.

    No full text
    <p>A549 cells were treated with 50 µM LJK-11 for 6, 12, 24, or 36 hours. The cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western bolt analysis using antibodies as indicated. Antibodies specific to the phosphorylated forms of the indicated proteins are labeled with (-P).</p

    Effect of LJK-11 on the growth and death of different tumor cells.

    No full text
    <p>A549, Hela, HGC-27, or MDA-MB-453 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of LJK-11 for 48 hours. The effect of LJK-11 on cell growth and death was evaluated by MTT assay. The cell viability is expressed as a percentage of the compound-treated viable cells divided by the viable cells of the untreated control. The data are the means of triplicates ±SD.</p

    Effect of LJK-11 on tubulin polymerization.

    No full text
    <p>Effects of LJK-11 (250 µM), colchicines (10 µM), nocodazole (10 µM), or Taxol (10 µM) on bovine brain tubulin polymerization were measured turbidimetrically(A). Effects of 1 µM, 5 µM, 25 µM, 100 µM, 200 µM LJK-11 on bovine brain tubulin polymerization were also measured. Changes in absorbance at 340 nm (A<sub>340</sub>) were measured and plotted as a function of time(B).</p

    Effects of LJK-11 on cell cycle distribution.

    No full text
    <p>A. Flow cytometry analysis of LJK-11-treated A549 tumor cells. A549 cells were incubated with different concentrations of LJK-11 for 24 hours. The cells were then fixed and stained with PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. B. Percentage of cells in G2/M phase after 24 hours treatment with different concentrations of LJK-11. The data are the means of triplicates ±SD. C. Flow cytometry analysis of LJK-11-treated MDA-MB-453 tumor cells. MDA-MB-453 cells were incubated with different concentrations of LJK-11 for 24 hours. The cells were then fixed and stained with PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. D. Percentage of cells in G2/M phase after 24 hours treatment with different concentrations of LJK-11. The data are the representative of three independent experiments.</p

    Synergistic effect of LJK-11 and colchicine on blocking mitosis.

    No full text
    <p><b>A</b>. Flow cytometry analysis of the effects of LJK-11 (10 µM), colchicines (20 nM), or the combination of the two on cell cycle distribution. A549 cells were incubated with 10 µM LJK-11, 20 nM colchicine, or combination of 10 µM LJK-11 and 20 nM colchicine for 24 hours. The cells were then fixed and stained with PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. <b>B</b>. Percentage of cells in G2/M phase after 24 hours treatment with 10 µM LJK-11, 20 nM colchicine, or combination of 10 µM LJK-11 and 20 nM colchicine. <b>C</b>. Concentration dependent G2/M arrest by treatment of colchicines or LJK-11 for 24 h. Also indicated in the figures are the percentages of G2/M arrest induced by the combination of 10 µM LJK-11 and 20 nM colchicine. Data are the means of triplicates ± SD.</p

    Effects of LJK-11 on mitotic spindle formation.

    No full text
    <p>A549 cells were incubated on glass coverslips with different reagents for 16 hours, and then fixed and stained with α-tubulin antibody to visualize microtubules (green) and with DAPI to visualize chromosomes (blue). The cells were visualized by indirect immunofluorescent microscopy. A: control cells treated with equal volume of DMSO (0.1%). B: cells treated with 100 µM LJK-11. C: cells treated with 5 nM nocodazole. D: cells treated with 100 nM colchicine. E: cells treated with 50 nM Taxol.</p

    DataSheet_1_Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the metabolic programming of GM-CSF- and M-CSF- differentiated mouse macrophages.docx

    No full text
    Macrophages play a critical role in the inflammatory response and tumor development. Macrophages are primarily divided into pro-inflammatory M1-like and anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages based on their activation status and functions. In vitro macrophage models could be derived from mouse bone marrow cells stimulated with two types of differentiation factors: GM-CSF (GM-BMDMs) and M-CSF (M-BMDMs), to represent M1- and M2-like macrophages, respectively. Since macrophage differentiation requires coordinated metabolic reprogramming and transcriptional rewiring in order to fulfill their distinct roles, we combined both transcriptome and metabolome analysis, coupled with experimental validation, to gain insight into the metabolic status of GM- and M-BMDMs. The data revealed higher levels of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle), oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), fatty acid oxidation (FAO), and urea and ornithine production from arginine in GM-BMDMs, and a preference for glycolysis, fatty acid storage, bile acid metabolism, and citrulline and nitric oxide (NO) production from arginine in M-BMDMs. Correlation analysis with the proteomic data showed high consistency in the mRNA and protein levels of metabolic genes. Similar results were also obtained when compared to RNA-seq data of human monocyte derived macrophages from the GEO database. Furthermore, canonical macrophage functions such as inflammatory response and phagocytosis were tightly associated with the representative metabolic pathways. In the current study, we identified the core metabolites, metabolic genes, and functional terms of the two distinct mouse macrophage populations. We also distinguished the metabolic influences of the differentiation factors GM-CSF and M-CSF, and wish to provide valuable information for in vitro macrophage studies.</p
    corecore