Large regenerative nodules in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome after TIPS positioning while on the liver transplantation list diagnosed by Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI

BACKGROUND: Large regenerative nodules (LRNs) are hyperplastic benign nodules most commonly associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), caused by outflow obstruction of the hepatic veins or vena cava. To our knowledge, no cases of LRNs arising in BCS after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) positioning and detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI have been reported in the literature. METHODS: A 58-year-old woman with BCS, on the liver transplantation (LT) list, underwent a follow-up enhanced MRI. Two years earlier, a TIPS had been placed. In 2008, recurrent hepaticoencephalopathy resistant to medical treatment fulfilled the LT criteria for BCS treated with TIPS and the patient was therefore added to the LT list. CT performed before TIPS had not detected any hepatic lesions. CT performed six months after TIPS showed its complete patency but documented two indeterminate hypervascular liver lesions. RESULTS: MRI performed with Gd-EOB-DTPA revealed additional hypervascular lesions with uptake and retention of the medium in the hepatobiliary phase, thus reflecting a benign behavior of hepatocellular composition. These MRI features were related to LRNs as confirmed by histopathologic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is potentially superior to standard imaging using gadolinium chelates or spiral CT, especially for the differential diagnosis of hypervascular lesions. Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI may become the imaging method of choice for evaluating LT list patients with BCS after TIPS placement

Fatigue and pruritus at onset identify a more aggressive subset of primary biliary cirrhosis

Background & Aims: In recent years, primary biliary cirrhosis is mostly diagnosed in patients who are asymptomatic; however, a proportion of cases still present with typical complaints such as fatigue and/or pruritus. We compared biochemical, histological and immunological features of patients with or without fatigue and/or pruritus at onset to see whether the different clinical presentation may eventually impact on disease progression. Methods: We analysed the Bologna cohort of 216 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis referred to our Centre between 1997 and 2007, according to symptomatic (fatigue and/or pruritus) or asymptomatic presentation. Clinical, biochemical, histological and immunological feature at diagnosis, response to ursodeoxycholic acid and progression of the disorder were compared after a mean follow-up of 81 ± 75 months. Results: At diagnosis, symptomatic patients were significantly more often women (98.6% vs. 87.2%, P = 0.004), younger (mean age 49 ± 12 vs. 55 ± 12 years, P = 0.003) and with more pronounced biochemical activity, as indicated by higher alkaline phosphatase (mean 2.93 ± 2 vs. 2.12, P = 0.002) and aminotransferase (mean 1.92 ± 1 vs. 1.47 ± 1.27, P = 0.014) levels, whereas histological stage and autoantibody profile were similar. Symptomatic patients were less likely to respond to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy (63% vs. 81%, P = 0.006) and developed more often cirrhosis and its complications (31% vs. 13%, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Fatigue and/or pruritus at onset identify a subset of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis who preferentially are women, younger, with a particularly active disease, less responsive to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, and more inclined to evolve to cirrhosis and its complications

Diagnostic difficulties, therapeutic strategies, and performance of scoring systems in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and concurrent hepatitis B/C

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is already difficult, and that of AIH with chronic viral hepatitis including hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) is even more challenging. To date, only a few case-based studies have described this association. AIM: The aim was to retrospectively assess diagnostic difficulties, therapeutic approaches, and performance of the scoring systems in AIH patients with concurrent HBV and HCV. METHODS: A total of 25 patients from United States, Sweden, Italy, and Turkey were retrospectively evaluated. Both revised and simplified criteria suggested by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group were applied for each patient. All study data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients, 20 (80%) had concomitant HCV and 5 (20%) had HBV. Based on the revised scoring system and simplified criteria, 18 (72%) and 12 (48%) patients were diagnosed as "probable" AIH. None of the patients were diagnosed as "definite" AIH according to both scoring systems. Patients with HCV initially were treated with immunosuppressive agents, and antiviral therapy was commenced when biochemical remission occurred. AIH patients with HBV were first treated with antiviral and thereafter, immunosuppressive therapy was started. CONCLUSIONS: This large case series describes concurrent AIH and chronic viral hepatitis. The revised scoring system for AIH had a better performance than the simplified scoring system. However, neither scoring system is optimal for diagnosing AIH alone. In these patients, a definitive diagnosis of AIH should be based on a combination of serological profiles, histological findings, scoring systems, treatment response, and outcomes