3 research outputs found

    The effect of racemic gossypol and AT-101 on angiogenic profile of OVCAR-3 cells: a preliminary molecular framework for gossypol enantiomers

    No full text
    To compare the effect of racemic gossypol with its (–)/(–) enantiomer (AT-101) on expression profiles of angiogenic molecules by mRNA levels in human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. Methods: Cell viability assay (2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5- sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide) was used to detect cytotoxicity of gossypol enantiomers. DNA fragmentation by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay was used to evaluate the rate of apoptosis. The mRNA expression levels of angiogenic molecules were investigated by Human Angiogenesis RT2 ProfilerTM PCR Array (SuperArray, Frederick, MD). Results: Both racemic form and AT-101 resulted in a significant cytotoxicity and induced apoptosis. This effect was observed in a dose- and time dependent manner. However, AT-101 was much more potent. In addition, the treatment of 10 μM of racemic gossypol alone and 3 μM of AT-101 alone resulted in significant down-regulation (≥ 3 fold) in mRNA levels of some pivotal angiogenic molecules in OVCAR-3, but altered gene profiles were different by the treatment of each enantiomer. Conclusion: The efficacy of two gossypol enantiomers in OVCAR-3 cells showed distinction. AT-101 was much more potent than racemic gossypol, not only by means of cell death and apoptosis, but also by modulation of angiogenic molecules released from OVCAR-3 cells. Further studies with endothelial cells should be done to verify the anti-angiogenic effect of gossypol enantiomers in cancer treatment

    High-resolution melting analysis for screening of Turkish germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 [Türk hasta popülasyonunda BRCA1 ve BRCA2 germline mutasyonlarïnïn high resolution melting analizi ile taranmasi{dotless}]

    No full text
    The germline mutations of breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 (BRCA1) and 2 (BRCA2) are the two most frequently mutated genes in inherited breast and ovarian cancer. Among the most known mutations in these tumor suppressor genes are 5382insC and 185delAG in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2. The aim of the current study was to investigate the frequency of these BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Western Turkish population. Twenty-five women with a history of self breast cancer and family history, 25 women with a familial history of breast cancer in their first degree-relatives and five healthy women formed the studied groups. DNA from peripheral blood was extracted and analyzed by high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. None of the 50 patients and five healthy individuals was found to carry 185delAG mutation in BRCA1 and the 6174delT mutation in BRCA2. But, we found the 5382insC mutation in exon 20 of BRCA1 in five patients, having a strong family history. Four of these five patients were from the same family. Our preliminary results indicate that penetrance of 5382insC mutation in BRCA1 mutations is dominant in Turkish population; however, it seems there might be some other genes that contribute more significantly to familial breast carcinoma in Turkish population in BRCA

    The effect of racemic gossypol and AT-101 on angiogenic profile of OVCAR-3 cells: A preliminary molecular framework for gossypol enantiomers

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 20010531Aim: To compare the effect of racemic gossypol with its (-)/(-) enantiomer (AT-101) on expression profiles of angiogenic molecules by mRNA levels in human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. Methods: Cell viability assay (2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide) was used to detect cytotoxicity of gossypol enantiomers. DNA fragmentation by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay was used to evaluate the rate of apoptosis. The mRNA expression levels of angiogenic molecules were investigated by Human Angiogenesis RT2 Profiler™ PCR Array (SuperArray, Frederick, MD). Results: Both racemic form and AT-101 resulted in a significant cytotoxicity and induced apoptosis. This effect was observed in a dose- and time dependent manner. However, AT-101 was much more potent. In addition, the treatment of 10 µM of racemic gossypol alone and 3 µM of AT-101 alone resulted in significant down-regulation (? 3 fold) in mRNA levels of some pivotal angiogenic molecules in OVCAR-3, but altered gene profiles were different by the treatment of each enantiomer. Conclusion: The efficacy of two gossypol enantiomers in OVCAR-3 cells showed distinction. AT-101 was much more potent than racemic gossypol, not only by means of cell death and apoptosis, but also by modulation of angiogenic molecules released from OVCAR-3 cells. Further studies with endothelial cells should be done to verify the anti-angiogenic effect of gossypol enantiomers in cancer treatment
    corecore