6 research outputs found

    Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the measurement of hepatic iron concentration

    No full text
    The potential application of fine-needle aspiration liver biopsy in the documentation of hepatic iron overload has been assessed in iron-loaded rats. Fineneedle aspiration and standard liver biopsy specimens were obtained from three groups of animals supplemented with oral and parenteral iron for 2 to 6 mo. The mean dry weights of standard and fine-needle biopsy specimens were 7.41 ± 0.77 (± S.E.M.) and 0.57 ± 0.54 mg, respectively. Hepatic iron in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens correlated significantly with hepatic iron in standard liver biopsy specimens as measured by biochemical determination, computerized image analysis and histological grading (r > 0.9, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we have shown that fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver can obtain sufficient tissue for biochemical measurement of the hepatic iron concentration in an animal model of iron overload. The clinical applications of fine-needle aspiration liver biopsy in human beings with iron overload is currently being investigated

    Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: A prospective study

    Full text link
    Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging appears to improve prostate cancer detection but prospective studies are lacking. We determined the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting significant prostate cancer before diagnostic biopsy in men with abnormal prostate specific antigen/digital rectal examination. Materials and Methods In this single center, prospective study men older than 40 years with abnormal prostate specific antigen/digital rectal examination and no previous multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging underwent T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging without an endorectal coil. Imaging was allocated alternately to 1.5/3.0 Tesla. Imaging was double reported independently using PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) by specialist radiologists. Transperineal grid directed 30-core biopsy was performed with additional magnetic resonance imaging directed cores for regions of interest outside template locations. Four significant cancer definitions were tested. Chi-square and logistic regression analysis was done. Men undergoing prostatectomy were analyzed. Results Of the 165 men who enrolled in the study 150 were analyzed. Median age was 62.4 years, median prostate specific antigen was 5.6 ng/ml, 29% of patients had an abnormal digital rectal examination and 88% underwent initial biopsy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was positive (PI-RADS 3 to 5) in 66% of patients, 61% had prostate cancer and 30% to 41% had significant prostate cancer (definitions 1 to 4). For significant cancer sensitivity was 93% to 96%, specificity was 47% to 53%, and negative and positive predictive values were 92% to 96% and 43% to 57%, respectively (definitions 1 to 4). Radical prostatectomy results in 48 men were similar. Aggregate PI-RADS (4 to 20) performed similarly to overall PI-RADS (1 to 5). Negative and positive predictive values (100% and 71%, respectively) were similar in men at higher risk, defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 10 ng/ml with abnormal digital rectal examination. On multivariate analysis PI-RADS score was associated with significant prostate cancer (p <0.001) but magnet strength was not. Adding PI-RADS to the multivariate model improved the AUC from 0.810 to 0.913 (95% CI 0.038-0.166, p = 0.002). Radiologist agreement was substantial (weighted κ = 0.626). Conclusions Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging reported by expert radiologists achieved an excellent negative predictive value and a moderate positive predictive value for significant prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. © 2014 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc

    Clinically Significant Depressive Symptoms Are Prevalent in People With Extremely Short Prognoses-A Systematic Review.

    Full text link
    ContextCurrently, systematic evidence of the prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms in people with extremely short prognoses is not available to inform its global burden, assessment, and management.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses and extremely short prognoses (range of days to weeks).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis (random-effects model) were performed (PROSPERO: CRD42019125119). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and CareSearch were searched for studies (1994-2019). Data were screened for the prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms (assessed using validated depression-specific screening tools or diagnostic criteria) of adults with advanced life-limiting illnesses and extremely short prognoses (defined by survival or functional status). Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Reviews Checklist for Prevalence Studies for individual studies and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) across studies.ResultsThirteen studies were included. The overall pooled prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms in adults with extremely short prognoses (n = 10 studies; extremely short prognoses: N = 905) using depression-specific screening tools was 50% (95% CI: 29%-70%; I2 = 97.6%). Prevalence of major and minor depression was 10% (95% CI: 4%-16%) and 5% (95% CI: 2%-8%), respectively. Major limitations included high heterogeneity, selection bias, and small sample sizes in individual studies.ConclusionsClinically, significant depressive symptoms were prevalent in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses and extremely short prognoses. Clinicians need to be proactive in the recognition and assessment of these symptoms to allow for timely intervention

    Bibliography

    No full text
    corecore