3 research outputs found
Male Oxidative Stress Infertility (MOSI): Proposed Terminology and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Male Infertility
Despite advances in the field of male reproductive health, idiopathic male infertility, in which a man has altered semen
characteristics without an identifiable cause and there is no female factor infertility, remains a challenging condition to diagnose
and manage. Increasing evidence suggests that oxidative stress (OS) plays an independent role in the etiology of male
infertility, with 30% to 80% of infertile men having elevated seminal reactive oxygen species levels. OS can negatively affect
fertility via a number of pathways, including interference with capacitation and possible damage to sperm membrane and
DNA, which may impair the sperm’s potential to fertilize an egg and develop into a healthy embryo. Adequate evaluation of
male reproductive potential should therefore include an assessment of sperm OS. We propose the term Male Oxidative Stress
Infertility, or MOSI, as a novel descriptor for infertile men with abnormal semen characteristics and OS, including many
patients who were previously classified as having idiopathic male infertility. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) can be a
useful clinical biomarker for the classification of MOSI, as it takes into account the levels of both oxidants and reductants
(antioxidants). Current treatment protocols for OS, including the use of antioxidants, are not evidence-based and have the
potential for complications and increased healthcare-related expenditures. Utilizing an easy, reproducible, and cost-effective
test to measure ORP may provide a more targeted, reliable approach for administering antioxidant therapy while minimizing
the risk of antioxidant overdose. With the increasing awareness and understanding of MOSI as a distinct male infertility diagnosis,
future research endeavors can facilitate the development of evidence-based treatments that target its underlying cause
OMICS: Current and future perspectives in reproductive medicine and technology
Many couples present fertility problems at their reproductive age, and although in the last years, the efficiency of assisted reproduction techniques has increased, these are still far from being 100% effective. A key issue in this field is the proper assessment of germ cells, embryos and endometrium quality, in order to determine the actual likelihood to succeed. Currently available analysis is mainly based on morphological features of oocytes, sperm and embryos and although these strategies have improved the results, there is an urgent need of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools. The emergence of the - OMICS technologies (epigenomics, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) permitted the improvement on the knowledge in this field, by providing with a huge amount of information regarding the biological processes involved in reproductive success, thereby getting a broader view of complex biological systems with a relatively low cost and effort
Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact