5 research outputs found
Neglected Value of Small Population-based Surveys: A Comparison with Demographic and Health Survey Data
We believe that global health practice and evaluation operate with
misleading assumptions about lack of reliability of small
population-based health surveys (district level and below), leading
managers and decision- makers to under-use this valuable information
and programmatic tool and to rely on health information from large
national surveys when neither timing nor available data meet their
needs. This paper uses a unique opportunity for comparison between a
knowledge, practice, and coverage (KPC) household survey and Rwanda
Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) carried out in overlapping
timeframes to disprove these enduring suspicions. Our analysis shows
that the KPC provides coverage estimates consistent with the RDHS
estimates for the same geographic areas. We discuss cases of divergence
between estimates. Application of the Lives Saved Tool to the KPC
results also yields child mortality estimates comparable with
DHSmeasured mortality. We draw three main lessons from the study and
conclude with recommendations for challenging unfounded assumptions
against the value of small household coverage surveys, which can be a
key resource in the arsenal of local health programmers
Engaging men to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding: a descriptive review of 28 projects in 20 low- and middle-income countries from 2003 to 2013
Abstract Background Lay support has been associated with improved breastfeeding practices, but studies of programs that engage men in breastfeeding support have shown mixed results and most are from high-income countries. The purpose of our research is to review strategies to engage men in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) promotion or support in 28 project areas across 20 low- and middle-income countries. This information may be used to inform program implementers and policymakers seeking to increase EBF. Methods We tested the difference between baseline and final EBF proportions using Pearson’s chi-square (a = 0.05) and identified project areas with a significant increase. We categorized male engagement strategies as low- and high-intensity, using information from project reports. We looked for patterns by intensity and geography and described strategies used to engage men in different places. Results Twenty-eight projects were reviewed; 21 (75%) were in areas where a statistically significant increase in EBF was observed between the beginning and end of the project. A variety of high- and low-intensity male engagement strategies was used in areas with an increase in EBF prevalence and in all geographic regions. High-intensity strategies engaged men directly during home or health visits by forming men’s groups and by working with male community leaders or members to promote EBF. Low-intensity strategies included large community meetings that included men, and radio messages, and other behavior change materials directed towards men. Conclusion Male engagement strategies took many forms in these project areas. We did not find consistent associations between the intensities or types of male engagement strategies and increases in EBF proportions. There is a gap in understanding how gender norms might impact male involvement in women’s health behaviors. This review does not support the broad application of male engagement to improve EBF practices, and we recommend considering local gender norms when designing programs to support women to EBF
Engaging men to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding: a descriptive review of 28 projects in 20 low- and middle-income countries from 2003 to 2013
Background: Lay support has been associated with improved breastfeeding
practices, but studies of programs that engage men in breastfeeding
support have shown mixed results and most are from high-income
countries. The purpose of our research is to review strategies to
engage men in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) promotion or support in 28
project areas across 20 low- and middle-income countries. This
information may be used to inform program implementers and policymakers
seeking to increase EBF. Methods: We tested the difference between
baseline and final EBF proportions using Pearson\u2019s chi-square (a
= 0.05) and identified project areas with a significant increase. We
categorized male engagement strategies as low- and high-intensity,
using information from project reports. We looked for patterns by
intensity and geography and described strategies used to engage men in
different places. Results: Twenty-eight projects were reviewed; 21
(75%) were in areas where a statistically significant increase in EBF
was observed between the beginning and end of the project. A variety of
high- and low-intensity male engagement strategies was used in areas
with an increase in EBF prevalence and in all geographic regions.
High-intensity strategies engaged men directly during home or health
visits by forming men\u2019s groups and by working with male community
leaders or members to promote EBF. Low-intensity strategies included
large community meetings that included men, and radio messages, and
other behavior change materials directed towards men. Conclusion: Male
engagement strategies took many forms in these project areas. We did
not find consistent associations between the intensities or types of
male engagement strategies and increases in EBF proportions. There is a
gap in understanding how gender norms might impact male involvement in
women\u2019s health behaviors. This review does not support the broad
application of male engagement to improve EBF practices, and we
recommend considering local gender norms when designing programs to
support women to EBF
Engaging men to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding: a descriptive review of 28 projects in 20 low- and middle-income countries from 2003 to 2013
Abstract Background Lay support has been associated with improved breastfeeding practices, but studies of programs that engage men in breastfeeding support have shown mixed results and most are from high-income countries. The purpose of our research is to review strategies to engage men in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) promotion or support in 28 project areas across 20 low- and middle-income countries. This information may be used to inform program implementers and policymakers seeking to increase EBF. Methods We tested the difference between baseline and final EBF proportions using Pearson’s chi-square (a = 0.05) and identified project areas with a significant increase. We categorized male engagement strategies as low- and high-intensity, using information from project reports. We looked for patterns by intensity and geography and described strategies used to engage men in different places. Results Twenty-eight projects were reviewed; 21 (75%) were in areas where a statistically significant increase in EBF was observed between the beginning and end of the project. A variety of high- and low-intensity male engagement strategies was used in areas with an increase in EBF prevalence and in all geographic regions. High-intensity strategies engaged men directly during home or health visits by forming men’s groups and by working with male community leaders or members to promote EBF. Low-intensity strategies included large community meetings that included men, and radio messages, and other behavior change materials directed towards men. Conclusion Male engagement strategies took many forms in these project areas. We did not find consistent associations between the intensities or types of male engagement strategies and increases in EBF proportions. There is a gap in understanding how gender norms might impact male involvement in women’s health behaviors. This review does not support the broad application of male engagement to improve EBF practices, and we recommend considering local gender norms when designing programs to support women to EBF