4 research outputs found
Community Reentry: Perceptions of People with Substance Use Problems Returning Home from New York City Jails
Each year about 100,000 people return to New York City communities from
municipal jails. Although about four-fifths report drug or alcohol problems, few have
received any formal drug treatment while in jail. Researchers and practitioners have
identified a number of policies related to corrections, income, housing, and drug
treatment that may be harmful to the successful reintegration of people leaving jail. In
order to explore the challenges to successful community reentry, six focus groups and
one in-depth interview were conducted with 37 men and women who had been
released from jail or prison in the last 12 months. Participants were asked to describe
their experiences prior to and immediately following release from jail. Findings suggest
that many people leaving jail are not prepared for release and, upon release, face a
myriad of obstacles to becoming healthy, productive members of their communities.
We discuss the implications of these findings for programs and policies that promote
community reintegration of individuals returning from correctional facilities.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40303/2/Van Olphen_Community Reentry - Perceptions of People_2006.pd
Recommended from our members
Managing identity impacts associated with disclosure of HIV status: a qualitative investigation.
Disclosure of HIV status to potential and current sex partners by HIV-positive people (HIVPP) is a complex issue that has received a significant amount of attention. Research has found that disclosure depends upon the evaluation by HIVPP of potential benefits and risks, especially of the risks stemming from the profound social stigma of HIV and AIDS. Drawing on concepts from Goffman's classic stigma theory and Anderson's more recently developed cultural-identity theory of drug abuse, we analyzed data from in-depth, post-intervention qualitative interviews with 116 heterosexually active, HIV-positive injection drug users enrolled in a randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent HIV transmission. We explored how disclosure experiences lead to “identity impacts” defined as: (1) identity challenges (i.e. interactions that challenge an individual's self-concept as a “normal” or non-deviant individual); and (2) identity transformations (i.e. processes whereby an individual comes to embrace a new identity and reject behaviors and values of an old one, resulting in the conscious adoption of a social and/or public identity as an HIV-positive individual). Participants engaged in several strategies to manage the identity impacts associated with disclosure. Implications of these findings for research and prevention programming are discussed
Challenges and Facilitating Factors in Sustaining Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: Lessons Learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers
In order to address the social, physical and economic determinants of urban health, researchers, public health practitioners, and community members have turned to more comprehensive and participatory approaches to research and interventions. One such approach, community-based participatory research (CBPR) in public health, has received considerable attention over the past decade, and numerous publications have described theoretical underpinnings, values, principles and practice. Issues related to the long-term sustainability of partnerships and activities have received limited attention. The purpose of this article is to examine the experiences and lessons learned from three Urban Research Centers (URCs) in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle, which were initially established in 1995 with core support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The experience of these Centers after core funding ceased in 2003 provides a case study to identify the challenges and facilitating factors for sustaining partnerships. We examine three broad dimensions of CBPR partnerships that we consider important for sustainability: (1) sustaining relationships and commitments among the partners involved; (2) sustaining the knowledge, capacity and values generated from the partnership; and (3) sustaining funding, staff, programs, policy changes and the partnership itself. We discuss the challenges faced by the URCs in sustaining these dimensions and the strategies used to overcome these challenges. Based on these experiences, we offer recommendations for: strategies that partnerships may find useful in sustaining their CBPR efforts; ways in which a Center mechanism can be useful for promoting sustainability; and considerations for funders of CBPR to increase sustainability