Mesothelioma and thymic tumors: Treatment challenges in (outside) a network setting

The management of patients with mesothelioma and thymic malignancy requires continuous multidisciplinary expertise at any step of the disease. A dramatic improvement in our knowledge has occurred in the last few years, through the development of databases, translational research programs, and clinical trials. Access to innovative strategies represents a major challenge, as there is a lack of funding for clinical research in rare cancers and their rarity precludes the design of robust clinical trials that could lead to specific approval of drugs. In this context, patient-centered initiatives, such as the establishment of dedicated networks, are warranted. International societies, such as IMIG (International Mesothelioma Interest Group) and ITMIG (International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group) provide infrastructure for global collaboration, and there are many advantages to having strong regional groups working on the same issues. There may be regional differences in risk factors, susceptibility, management and outcomes. The ability to address questions both regionally as well as globally is ideal to develop a full understanding of mesothelioma and thymic malignancies. In Europe, through the integration of national networks with EURACAN, the collaboration with academic societies and international groups, the development of networks in thoracic oncology provides multiplex integration of clinical care and research, ultimately ensuring equal access to high quality care to all patients, with the opportunity of conducting high level clinical and translational research projects

Treatment challenges in and outside a network setting: Head and neck cancers

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a rare disease that can affect different sites and is characterized by variable incidence and 5-year survival rates across Europe. Multiple factors need to be considered when choosing the most appropriate treatment for HNC patients, such as age, comorbidities, social issues, and especially whether to prefer surgery or radiation-based protocols. Given the complexity of this scenario, the creation of a highly specialized multidisciplinary team is recommended to guarantee the best oncological outcome and prevent or adequately treat any adverse effect. Data from literature suggest that the multidisciplinary team-based approach is beneficial for HNC patients and lead to improved survival rates. This result is likely due to improved diagnostic and staging accuracy, a more efficacious therapeutic approach and enhanced communication across disciplines. Despite the benefit of MTD, it must be noted that this approach requires considerable time, effort and financial resources and is usually more frequent in highly organized and high-volume centers. Literature data on clinical research suggest that patients treated in high-accrual centers report better treatment outcomes compared to patients treated in low-volume centers, where a lower radiotherapy-compliance and worst overall survival have been reported. There is general agreement that treatment of rare cancers such as HNC should be concentrated in high volume, specialized and multidisciplinary centers. In order to achieve this goal, the creation of international collaboration network is fundamental. The European Reference Networks for example aim to create an international virtual advisory board, whose objectives are the exchange of expertise, training, clinical collaboration and the reduction of disparities and enhancement of rationalize migration across Europe. The purpose of our work is to review all aspects and challenges in and outside this network setting planned for the management of HNC patients

Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia – The Results of the Pilot Study

The opportunistic cervical cancer screening has been conducted in Croatia since its introduction in the 1960s, in the context of a high quality gynaecological cytology with a long tradition and a wide network of primary care gynaecologists. In 2006, a pilot screening programme under the title »Early detection of cervical cancer was conducted in Primorsko-Goranska County (PGC)«, as the first organised cervical cancer screening ever conducted in the Republic of Croatia. The pilot screening programme targeted women aged 20–64 years. The pilot group consisted of 6,000 randomly sampled primary care patients of six gynaecologists. The women were invited via a personal letter and were given a questionnaire. The results of the first and the second year of screening, as well as of both years together were analysed. The response rate to the anamnestic questionnaire was 49.1%. The participation rates to the screening were 35.2% in 2007, and 46.5% in 2008, total of 42.7%. The increase in participation between years 2007 and 2008 was statistically significant (p=0.01). According to the age, the lowest participation rate of 33.3% was observed in the youngest group of women (20–29) and the highest of 60.7% in the oldest group (60–64). The detection rate of cytological abnormalities was 4.6% with 2.6% of borderline (ASCUS) cytology and referral rate of 1.2%. The highest abnormal Pap test frequencies of 6.8% and 7.1% were observed in the youngest age groups (20–29 and 30–39), and the lowest (2%) in the age group of 60–64. Specimen adequacy was generally of high quality with unsatisfactory rate of 0.8%, with statistically significant improvement in 2008, compared to the previous year (p=0.001). Although to a limited extension, during two-year pilot cervical cancer screening programme in PGC the participation rates and Pap smear adequacy have improved. We expect that the continuation of the programme will result in further increase of participation and higher overall quality of the programme

Cancer patient in the process of returning back to work : (a case of breast cancer patient)

Zgodnja diagnostika, nove terapevtske možnosti in uspešnejše zdravljenje raka so pripomogli tudi k temu, da se lahko večji delež bolnikov po zdravljenju raka vsaj deloma, če ne v celoti, vrne na delo. Za izvajalce zdravstvene oskrbe pomeni vrnitev na delo uspešen zaključek rehabilitacije, za bolnike in njihove bližnje pa boljšo kakovost življenja. Avtorica članka na primeru začasne nezmožnosti za delo bolnice z rakom dojke predstavlja vračanje na delo po procesu zdravljenja in rehabilitacije. V zaključku razmišlja o tem, kaj je pomembno za terapevta in bolnika po zdravljenju raka.Early diagnostics, new terapeutic methods and more successful treatment of cancer patients also enabeled them to return to work at least partly if not completly. For healthcare providers return to work means successful rehabilitation and for the patient and his close once better quality of live. The author of the article is representing a case of a breast cancer pacient who is on sick leave and is returning to work after the process of treatment and rehabilitaion. In the conclusions, she is thinking about what is important for the therapist and for the pacient after the cancer treatment

Colorectal cancer survival in the USA and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which stage at diagnosis and adherence to treatment guidelines may explain the persistent differences in colorectal cancer survival between the USA and Europe. DESIGN: A high-resolution study using detailed clinical data on Dukes' stage, diagnostic procedures, treatment and follow-up, collected directly from medical records by trained abstractors under a single protocol, with standardised quality control and central statistical analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 21 population-based registries in seven US states and nine European countries provided data for random samples comprising 12 523 adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with colorectal cancer during 1996-1998. OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression models were used to compare adherence to 'standard care' in the USA and Europe. Net survival and excess risk of death were estimated with flexible parametric models. RESULTS: The proportion of Dukes' A and B tumours was similar in the USA and Europe, while that of Dukes' C was more frequent in the USA (38% vs 21%) and of Dukes' D more frequent in Europe (22% vs 10%). Resection with curative intent was more frequent in the USA (85% vs 75%). Elderly patients (75-99 years) were 70-90% less likely to receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Age-standardised 5-year net survival was similar in the USA (58%) and Northern and Western Europe (54-56%) and lowest in Eastern Europe (42%). The mean excess hazard up to 5 years after diagnosis was highest in Eastern Europe, especially among elderly patients and those with Dukes' D tumours. CONCLUSIONS: The wide differences in colorectal cancer survival between Europe and the USA in the late 1990s are probably attributable to earlier stage and more extensive use of surgery and adjuvant treatment in the USA. Elderly patients with colorectal cancer received surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy less often than younger patients, despite evidence that they could also have benefited