Evaluation of Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow in Patients with Stable COPD

OBJECTIVE: Although the importance of assessing inspiratory flow in the selection of treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is understood, evaluation of this factor is not yet widespread or standardized. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) of patients with COPD and to explore the variables associated with a suboptimal PIF. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out at specialized nursing consultations over a period of 6 months. We collected clinical data as well as data on symptoms, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction with their inhalers via questionnaires. PIF was determined using the In-Check Dial G16((R)) device (Clement Clarke International, Ltd., Harlow, UK). In each case, the PIF was considered suboptimal when it was off-target for any of the prescribed inhalers. The association with suboptimal PIF was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and the results were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 122 COPD patients were included in this study, of whom 34 (27.9%) had suboptimal PIF. A total of 229 inhalers were tested, of which 186 (81.2%) were dry powder devices. The multivariate analysis found an association between suboptimal PIF and age (OR = 1.072; 95% CI (1.019, 1.128); p = 0.007) and forced vital capacity (OR = 0.961; 95% CI (0.933, 0.989); p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: About a third of patients in complex specialized COPD care have suboptimal PIFs, which is related to age and forced vital capacity

Recommendations for the Implementation of the Self-Administration of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin

María Torres-Durán,1 José Luis López-Campos,2,3 Myriam Calle Rubio,4 Carmen Montero-Martínez,5 Ana Priegue Carrera,6 Rosanel Amaro Rodríguez,7 Miriam Barrecheguren,8 María Ángeles Barrio Guirado,9 Francisco Javier Callejas-González,10 Francisco Casas-Maldonado,11 Layla Diab-Cáceres,12 Pilar García-Meseguer,9 José María Hernández-Pérez,13 Lourdes Lázaro-Asegurado,14 Cristina Martínez-González,15 Carlos Martínez Rivera,16 Francisco Javier Michel,17 José-Bruno Montoro-Ronsano,18 Raquel Sánchez,19 Marta Ortiz-Pica,20 Isabel Parra,21 José Pablo Quintero García,22 María del Rosario Ruiz-Serrano-de la Espada,23 Begoña Tortajada-Goitia,24 Marc Miravitlles8 1Pneumology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, NeumoVigo I+i Research Group, IIS Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain; 2Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; 3Medical and Surgery Unit for Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; 4Pneumology Department, Research Institute of Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 5Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain; 6Nursing Unit, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Pontevedra, Spain; 7Pneumology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; 8Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; 9Nursung Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 10Pneumology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain; 11Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain; 12Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; 13Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain; 14Pneumology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain; 15Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (FINBA-ISPA) Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; 16Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Germans Trías I Pujol, Institut d’investigació Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain; 17Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain; 18Hospital Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; 19Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain; 20Nursing Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; 21Pneumology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; 22Hospital Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 23Nursing Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 24Hospital Pharmacy Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Málaga, SpainCorrespondence: María Torres-Durán, Tel +34986811111, Email [email protected]: Administration of exogenous alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) is the only specific therapy for the management of pulmonary morbidity in patients with AAT deficiency. It requires weekly or biweekly intravenous infusions, which may impact patient independence and quality of life. Self-administration of AAT therapy is an alternative to reduce the burden for patients who require AAT therapy. We presented herein experts’ recommendations for the implementation of a program for the self-administration of AAT.Methods: This project was conducted using a modified nominal group technique and was undertaken in two online meetings involving the participation of 25 experts: specialists in pulmonology (n=17), nurses (n=5) and hospital pharmacists (n=3).Results: The following issues were discussed, and several recommendations were agreed upon on the following topics: a) patient profile and clinical evaluation, establishing selection criteria that should include clinical as well as social criteria; b) role of health care professionals, suggested roles for specialists in pulmonology, nurses, and hospital pharmacists; c) training by the nurse, including recommendations before initiating the training and the content of the training sessions; and d) logistic issues and follow-up, adherence, and patient support.Conclusion: We expect this proposal to increase awareness of this therapeutic alternative and facilitate the implementation of self-administration programs, thus contributing to optimizing the patient experience with AAT therapy. Further research on the outcomes of these programs, especially from the patient perspective, will also help to improve their design and implementation.Keywords: alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, disease burden, augmentation therapy, self-administratio