Consistent Reduction in Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction With Cangrelor as Assessed by Multiple Definitions

BACKGROUND: Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor approved to reduce periprocedural ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention not pretreated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. METHODS: A total of 11 145 patients were randomized to cangrelor or clopidogrel in the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial (Cangrelor versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition). We explored the effects of cangrelor on myocardial infarction (MI) using different definitions and performed sensitivity analyses on the primary end point of the trial. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients (4.2%) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had an MI as defined by the second universal definition. The majority of these MIs (n=433, 93.7%) were type 4a. Treatment with cangrelor reduced the incidence of MI at 48 hours (3.8% versus 4.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.97; P=0.02). When the Society of Coronary Angiography and Intervention definition of periprocedural MI was applied to potential ischemic events, there were fewer total MIs (n=134); however, the effects of cangrelor on MI remained significant (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92; P=0.01). Similar effects were seen in the evaluation of the effects of cangrelor on MIs with peak creatinine kinase-MB ≥10 times the upper limit of normal (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91) and those with peak creatinine kinase-MB ≥10 times the upper limit of normal, ischemic symptoms, or ECG changes (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84). MIs defined by any of these definitions were associated with increased risk of death at 30 days. Treatment with cangrelor reduced the composite end point of death, MI (Society of Coronary Angiography and Intervention definition), ischemia-driven revascularization, or Academic Research Consortium definite stent thrombosis (1.4% versus 2.1%; OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: MI in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, regardless of definition, remains associated with increased risk of death in the current era. Cangrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces MI regardless of the definition. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01156571

Efficacy and safety of cangrelor in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention – Insights from the CHAMPION program

Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). More aggressive antiplatelet therapy may mitigate this risk. The present study evaluates the efficacy of cangrelor in patients with PAD undergoing PCI. Methods and results This is a pooled analysis from the CHAMPION PCI, CHAMPION PLATFORM, AND CHAMPION PHOENIX trials, evaluating cangrelor versus either clopidogrel or placebo in PCI patients. The occurrence of the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization (IDR) was assessed in patients with and without PAD. GUSTO severe bleeding at 48 h was also evaluated. There were 1720 (7%) patients with PAD and 22,802 (93%) without PAD. After adjustment for differences in baseline variables, PAD patients, compared with those without PAD, experienced increased odds of the primary endpoint (OR [95% CI] = 1.27 [0.91, 1.77], P = 0.16) and GUSTO severe bleeding (OR [95% CI] = 3.24 [1.28, 8.21], P = 0.01). In PAD patients, the primary endpoint was 4.7% with cangrelor vs. 7.2% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 0.64 [0.42,0.96]); in patients without PAD the primary endpoint was 3.5% with cangrelor vs. 4.2% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.72,0.95]), P-interaction 0.23. Among patients with or without PAD, there was no significant difference in the rate of GUSTO severe bleeding with cangrelor compared with control, P-interaction 0.86. Conclusions In a pooled analysis of the CHAMPION studies, PAD was associated with increased rates of ischemic and bleeding complications. Cangrelor reduced the odds of ischemic events, without increasing GUSTO severe bleeding. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: CHAMPION PCI ( NCT00305162 ), CHAMPION PLATFORM ( NCT00385138 ), CHAMPION PHOENIX ( NCT01156571

Central Adjudication Identified Additional and Prognostically Important Myocardial Infarctions in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

n/

Characterization of the Average Daily Ischemic and Bleeding Risk After Primary PCI for STEMI.

BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrent ischemic and bleeding events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may not be uniform over time, which may affect the benefit-to-risk ratio of guideline-recommended antithrombotic therapies in different intervals. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize the average daily ischemic rates (ADIRs) and average daily bleeding rates (ADBRs) within the first year after primary PCI for STEMI. METHODS: Among 3,602 patients with STEMI who were enrolled in the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, all ischemic and bleeding events, including recurrent events, were classified according to the timing of their occurrence as acute (?24 h after PCI), subacute (1 day to 30 days), and late (30 days to 1 year). Patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel for the entire year. ADIRs included cardiac death, reinfarction, and definite stent thrombosis. ADBRs included non-coronary artery bypass graft-related Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeding. ADIRs and ADBRs were calculated as the total number of events divided by the number of patient-days of follow-up in each interval assuming a Poisson distribution. Generalized estimating equations were used to test the absolute least square mean differences (LSMD) between ADIRs and ADBRs. RESULTS: The ADIR and ADBR both exponentially decreased from the acute to the late periods (p < 0.0001). Although there were no significant differences in ADIR and ADBR in the acute phase (LSMD: +0.11%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.35% to 0.58%; p = 0.63), the ADBR was greater than the ADIR in the subacute phase (LSMD: -0.39%; 95% CI: -0.58% to -0.20%; p < 0.0001). In the late phase, the ADIR exceeded the ADBR (LSMD: +1.51%; 95% CI: 1.04% to 1.98%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After primary PCI, the ADIR and ADBR both markedly decreased over time. Although the rates for bleeding exceeded those for ischemia within 30 days, the daily risk of ischemia significantly exceeded the daily risk of bleeding beyond 30 days, supporting the use of intensified platelet inhibition during the first year after STEMI

Sensitivity of a Modified ACT Test to Levels of Bivalirudin Used During Cardiac Surgery

Assessment of anticoagulation status during cardiac surgery can be valuable for novel therapeutics, including direct thrombin inhibitors. The ecarin clotting time (ECT) has been reported to be sensitive for monitoring of bivalirudin in cardiac surgery but is not commercially available. The activated clotting time (ACT), commonly used for heparin monitoring, may display a lack of sensitivity to alternative anticoagulants when used in on-pump cardiac surgery. Both the ACT and ECT have been successfully used for monitoring bivalirudin anticoagulation in off-pump cardiac surgery. A new ACT, the ACTT, was developed to increase the linearity of the clotting time response to bivalirudin at higher concentrations. After Ethics Committee approval, a pilot study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of using bivalirudin for on-pump cardiac surgery and to evaluate dosing of bivalirudin in terms of the pharmacokinetic and safety profile in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Secondary objectives included an assessment of the anticoagulation profile and correlation of the response seen with various ACTs and the ECT with the plasma bivalirudin concentration in the patients’ blood. After informed consent, 10 sequential patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass received bivalirudin anticoagulation in lieu of heparin. Dosing was fixed (1.0 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2.5 mg/kg/h infusion) and not titrated on the basis of coagulation test results. At baseline and 15-minute intervals, blood samples were collected for ACT (ACTT, Celite, kaolin, ACT+), ECT, and bivalirudin plasma level measurements. Over the range of bivalirudin plasma concentrations in this study, all clot-based systems examined were prolonged according to concentration and showed good correlation with bivalirudin plasma levels. The ACTT and the ECT showed greater sensitivity to bivalirudin (∼28.5 sec/μg/ml bivalirudin) compared with the other ACTs evaluated (∼14 sec/μg/ml). This difference in sensitivity was also evident at low concentrations of bivalirudin (<10 μg/ml), with the ECT and ACTT showing slopes near 40, and the ACT slopes varying from 18 to 27 sec/μg/ml. The ACTT assay is sensitive to levels of bivalirudin and may offer a simple method for monitoring bivalirudin during cardiac surgery

Reduction in cardiac mortality with bivalirudin in patients with and without major bleeding: The HORIZONS-AMI trial (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the reduction in cardiac mortality in those taking bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (UFH+GPI) can be fully attributed to reduced bleeding. BACKGROUND: The association between hemorrhagic complications and mortality may explain the survival benefit with bivalirudin. METHODS: A total of 3,602 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to bivalirudin versus UFH+GPI. Three-year cardiac mortality was analyzed in patients with and without major bleeding. RESULTS: When compared with UFH+GPI, bivalirudin resulted in lower 3-year rates of major bleeding (6.9% vs. 10.5%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51 to 0.80], p < 0.0001) and cardiac mortality (2.9% vs. 5.1%, HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.40 to 0.80], p = 0.001). Three-year cardiac mortality was reduced in bivalirudin-treated patients with major bleeding (20 fewer deaths with bivalirudin; 5.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.025) and without major bleeding (18 fewer deaths with bivalirudin; 2.6% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.048). In a fully-adjusted multivariable model accounting for major bleeding and other adverse events, bivalirudin was still associated with a 43% reduction in 3-year cardiac mortality (adjusted HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.39 to 0.83], p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin reduces cardiac mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, an effect that can only partly be attributed to prevention of bleeding. Further studies are required to identify the nonhematologic benefits of bivalirudin. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT00433966)