7 research outputs found

    Houseplace influence on the avian utilization of pine monocultures, Savannah River Plant, South Carolina

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to measure the avifaunal utilization of abandoned farm houseplaces and selected pine stand monocultures. A further consideration was the influence of houseplaces on the avian composition of adjacent pine stands. The study was conducted on the Energy Research and Development Administration\u27s Savannah River Plant, South Carolina, during the period April-July, 1976. The study area consisted of five study plots of nine hectares each. Forty-four species were recorded in the area during the study period. Fifteen species were breeding, and 29 were visitants. Importance value was utilized to determine that the pine warbler (IV = 125.6) and brown-headed nuthatch (120.1) were the two most important species in the managed pine habitat. The Carolina chickadee (114.3) and cardinal (106.5) were the two most important species in the houseplace habitat. These four species comprised 48.3 percent of all individuals recorded. Avian populations of houseplace-pine stand plots were compared to pine stands without houseplaces using the coefficient of community. The similarity of these two communities was .237 indicating dissimilar avian composition. Breeding bird diversity between the houseplace-pine stand plots and the pine stand without houseplace was significantly different (p\u3c.01). Total bird diversity (breeding and visitant) for the two habitats was also significantly different (p\u3c.05). Results indicate that houseplaces provided a habitat diversity which attracted bird species not occurring in the pine stands without houseplaces. This was true of breeding birds and visitants. Evaluation of the results suggests that management practices aimed at maintaining or increasing avian diversity in pine regions of the Savannah River Plant incorporate the houseplace concept

    Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

    Get PDF
    Background Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common type of chronic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has been shown to improve the histological features of NASH. Here we report results from a planned interim analysis of an ongoing, phase 3 study of obeticholic acid for NASH. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adult patients with definite NASH,non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score of at least 4, and fibrosis stages F2–F3, or F1 with at least oneaccompanying comorbidity, were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive oral placebo, obeticholic acid 10 mg, or obeticholic acid 25 mg daily. Patients were excluded if cirrhosis, other chronic liver disease, elevated alcohol consumption, or confounding conditions were present. The primary endpointsfor the month-18 interim analysis were fibrosis improvement (≄1 stage) with no worsening of NASH, or NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, with the study considered successful if either primary endpoint was met. Primary analyses were done by intention to treat, in patients with fibrosis stage F2–F3 who received at least one dose of treatment and reached, or would have reached, the month 18 visit by the prespecified interim analysis cutoff date. The study also evaluated other histological and biochemical markers of NASH and fibrosis, and safety. This study is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02548351, and EudraCT, 20150-025601-6. Findings Between Dec 9, 2015, and Oct 26, 2018, 1968 patients with stage F1–F3 fibrosis were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment; 931 patients with stage F2–F3 fibrosis were included in the primary analysis (311 in the placebo group, 312 in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 308 in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). The fibrosis improvement endpoint was achieved by 37 (12%) patients in the placebo group, 55 (18%) in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group (p=0·045), and 71 (23%) in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group (p=0·0002). The NASH resolution endpoint was not met (25 [8%] patients in the placebo group, 35 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group [p=0·18], and 36 [12%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group [p=0·13]). In the safety population (1968 patients with fibrosis stages F1–F3), the most common adverse event was pruritus (123 [19%] in the placebo group, 183 [28%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 336 [51%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group); incidence was generally mild to moderate in severity. The overall safety profile was similar to that in previous studies, and incidence of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups (75 [11%] patients in the placebo group, 72 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 93 [14%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). Interpretation Obeticholic acid 25 mg significantly improved fibrosis and key components of NASH disease activity among patients with NASH. The results from this planned interim analysis show clinically significant histological improvement that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. This study is ongoing to assess clinical outcomes

    The Nature and Reactivity of Ferryl Heme in Compounds I and II

    No full text
    Aerobic organisms have evolved to activate oxygen from the atmosphere, which allows them to catalyze the oxidation of different kinds of substrates. This activation of oxygen is achieved by a metal center (usually iron or copper) buried within a metalloprotein. In the case of iron-containing heme enzymes, the activation of oxygen is achieved by formation of transient iron-oxo (ferryl) intermediates; these intermediates are called Compound I and Compound II. The Compound I and II intermediates were first discovered in the 1930s in horseradish peroxidase, and it is now known that these same species are used across the family of heme enzymes, which include all of the peroxidases, the heme catalases, the P450s, cytochrome c oxidase, and NO synthase. Many years have passed since the first observations, but establishing the chemical nature of these transient ferryl species remains a fundamental question that is relevant to the reactivity, and therefore the usefulness, of these species in biology.This Account summarizes experiments that were conceived and conducted at Leicester and presents our ideas on the chemical nature, stability, and reactivity of these ferryl heme species. We begin by briefly summarizing the early milestones in the field, from the 1940s and 1950s. We present comparisons between the nature and reactivity of the ferryl species in horseradish peroxidase, cytochrome c peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase; and we consider different modes of electron delivery to ferryl heme, from different substrates in different peroxidases.We address the question of whether the ferryl heme is best formulated as an (unprotonated) FeIV═O or as a (protonated) FeIV–OH species. A range of spectroscopic approaches (EXAFS, resonance Raman, Mossbauer, and EPR) have been used over many decades to examine this question, and in the last ten years, X-ray crystallography has also been employed. We describe how information from all of these studies has blended together to create an overall picture, and how the recent application of neutron crystallography has directly identified protonation states and has helped to clarify the precise nature of the ferryl heme in cytochrome c peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase. We draw comparisons between the Compound I and Compound II species that we have observed in peroxidases with those found in other heme systems, notably the P450s, highlighting possible commonality across these heme ferryl systems. The identification of proton locations from neutron structures of these ferryl species opens the door for understanding the proton translocations that need to occur during O–O bond cleavage

    Milton Friedman and U.S. Monetary History: 1961-2006

    No full text

    Bibliography

    No full text

    How Biology Handles Nitrite

    No full text
    corecore