Head-to-head comparison of cerebral blood flow single-photon emission computed tomography and F-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease

BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) is only 70% accurate. Reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism in parieto-temporal and posterior cingulate cortex may assist diagnosis. While widely accepted that 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18 F-FDG PET) has superior accuracy to CBF-SPECT for AD, there are very limited head-to-head data from clinically relevant populations and these studies relied on clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. AIMS: To compare directly the accuracy of CBF-SPECT and 18 F-FDG PET in patients referred for diagnostic studies in detecting β-amyloid PET confirmed AD. METHODS: A total of 126 patients, 56% with mild cognitive impairment and 44% with dementia, completed both CBF-SPECT and 18 F-FDG PET as part of their diagnostic assessment, and subsequently underwent β-amyloid PET for research purposes. Transaxial slices and Neurostat 3D-SSP analyses of 18 F-FDG PET and CBF-SPECT scans were independently reviewed by five nuclear medicine clinicians blinded to all other data. Operators selected the most likely diagnosis and their diagnostic confidence. Accuracy analysis used final diagnosis incorporating β-amyloid PET as the reference standard. RESULTS: Clinicians reported high diagnostic confidence in 83% of 18 F-FDG PET compared to 67% for CBF-SPECT (P = 0.001). All reviewers showed individually higher accuracy using 18 F-FDG PET. Based on majority read, the combined area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnosing AD was 0.71 for 18 F-FDG PET and 0.61 for CBF-SPECT (P = 0.02). The sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET and CBF-SPECT was 76% versus 43% (P < 0.001), while specificity was 74% versus 83% (P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: 18 F-FDG PET is superior to CBF-SPECT in detecting AD among patients referred for the assessment of cognitive impairment

Abnormalities at three musculoskeletal sites on whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography can diagnose polymyalgia rheumatica with high sensitivity and specificity

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT findings in PMR and generate a diagnostic algorithm utilizing a minimum number of musculoskeletal sites. METHODS: Steroid-naïve patients with newly diagnosed PMR (2012 EULAR/ACR classification criteria) were prospectively recruited to undergo whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Each PMR case was age- and sex-matched to four PET/CT controls. Control scan indication, diagnosis and medical history were extracted from the clinical record. Qualitative and semi-quantitative scoring (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake at 21 musculoskeletal sites was undertaken for cases and controls. Results informed the development of a novel PET/CT diagnostic algorithm using a classification and regression trees (CART) method. RESULTS: Thirty-three cases met the inclusion criteria and were matched to 132 controls. Mean age was 68.6 ± 7.4 years for cases compared with 68.2 ± 7.3 for controls, and 54.5% were male. Median CRP was 49 mg/L (32-65) and ESR 41.5 mm/h (24.6-64.4) in the PMR group. The predominant control indication for PET/CT was malignancy (63.6%). Individual musculoskeletal sites proved insufficient for diagnostic purposes. A novel algorithm comprising 18F-FDG uptake ≥ 2 adjacent to the ischial tuberosities in combination with either abnormalities at the peri-articular shoulder or interspinous bursa achieved a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 92.4% for diagnosing PMR. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake adjacent to the ischial tuberosities together with findings at the peri-articular shoulder or interspinous bursa on whole-body PET/CT is highly sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of PMR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.anzctr.org.au , ACTRN1261400696695