6 research outputs found
Evaluation of cell wall preparations for proteomics: a new procedure for purifying cell walls from Arabidopsis hypocotyls
The ultimate goal of proteomic analysis of a cell compartment should be the
exhaustive identification of resident proteins; excluding proteins from other
cell compartments. Plant cell walls possess specific difficulties. Several
reported procedures to isolate cell walls for proteomic analyses led to the
isolation of a high proportion (more than 50%) of predicted intracellular
proteins. The rationales of several published procedures to isolate cell walls
for proteomics were analyzed, with regard to the bioinformatic-predicted
subcellular localization of the identified proteins. A new procedure was
developed to prepare cell walls from etiolated hypocotyls of Arabidopsis
thaliana. After salt extraction, a high proportion of proteins predicted to be
secreted was released (73%), belonging to the same functional classes as
proteins identified using previously described protocols. The new cell wall
preparation described in this paper gives the lowest proportion of proteins
predicted to be intracellular when compared to available protocols. The
application of its principles should lead to a more realistic view of the cell
wall proteome, at least for the weakly bound CWP extractable by salts. In
addition, it offers a clean cell wall preparation for subsequent extraction of
strongly bound CWP
Cell wall proteins: a new insight through proteomics
Cell wall proteins are essential constituents of plant cell walls; they are
involved in modifications of cell wall components, wall structure, signaling
and interactions with plasma membrane proteins at the cell surface. The
application of proteomic approaches to the cell wall compartment raises
important questions: are there technical problems specific to cell wall
proteomics? What kinds of proteins can be found in Arabidopsis walls? Are some
of them unexpected? What sort of post-translational modifications have been
characterized in cell wall proteins to date? The purpose of this review is to
discuss the experimental results obtained to date using proteomics, as well as
some of the new questions challenging future research
Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
Expression of a gene encoding a ribosomal p40 protein and identification of an active promoter site
The promoter of a gene encoding a ribosome-associated protein of 40 kDa from Arabidopsis thaliana (A-p40) was sequenced and the expression of the gene studied. A-p40 was expressed in the same organs and with the same variations as the eukaryotic elongation factor 1α (eEF1A), another gene coding for a protein involved in translation Arabidopsis plants transformed with a β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene driven by the A-p40 promoter confirm that A-p40 is expressed in actively dividing and growing cells. eEF1A promoter-GUS fusions have the same pattern of expression. Comparison of cis-acting elements from A-p40 and eEF1A revealed some common elements. A-p40 promoter deletions and transient gene expression in transfected Arabidopsis protopasts allowed the identification of trap40, a cis-acting element regulating gene expression. Gel retardation experiments indicate that eEF1A and A-p40 are regulated by different cis-acting elements. The role of such elements is discussed.This work was partially supported by EEC project HCM ERBCHRXCT940678, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Universite Paul Sabatier (Toulouse, France). I.S. was supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Ministere de la Recherche et l’Enseignement Superieur, France.Peer reviewe