Histogram distribution for the samples – (a) Female, (b) Male, (c) 1.5 T and (d) 3 T.

<p>Histogram distribution for the samples – (a) Female, (b) Male, (c) 1.5 T and (d) 3 T.</p

Unadjusted means and mean differences (95% confidence interval) of regional cortical thickness by field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) for right and left hemispheres in 295 controls using multivariate regression model.

<p>The regions with the significant field strength effect (p<0.05) on cortical thickness are denoted with “*”.</p><p>Note: overall field strength effect on regional cortical thickness is significant with p-value <0.0001 using Pillai's Trace test. ⁺STS  =  superior temporal sulcus.</p

Sample distribution based on image resolution, pulse sequence and scanner manufacturer type.

<p>*Statistical analysis based on scanner type excluded 2 datasets from the sample population.</p

L'État français ne doit pas avoir de doute sur le fait qu'une extradition n'emportera pas des conséquences d'une gravité exceptionnelle pour pouvoir y procéder

<p>Note: overall field strength effect on regional cortical thickness is significant with p-value <0.0001 using Pillai's Trace test; Factors ajusted for include: age, gender, resolution, scanner type, sequence, and interactions of field*age, and field*gender. <b>⁺</b>STS  =  superior temporal sulcus.</p

Regional cortical thickness of the 34 segmented regions plotted for the three age groups.

<p>Regional cortical thickness of the 34 segmented regions plotted for the three age groups.</p

Lateral and medial views of inflated right hemisphere at 1.5 T and 3 T for male vs. female differences in cortical thickness.

<p>The labeled regions are: (A) and (B) precentral, (C) transverse temporal, (D) isthmus cingulate, (E) lingual and (F) cuneus</p

Demographic information for the sample of 295 controls split into both genders and field strengths.

<p>Demographic information for the sample of 295 controls split into both genders and field strengths.</p

Mean and standard deviations of automated (left) and semi-automated (right) segmentation accuracy and bias measures, including similarity index (SI), correct estimation index (CEI), over estimation index (OEI), and under estimation index (UEI) for cerebral gray matter (light gray), cerebral white matter (black), and CSF (gray).

<p>Mean and standard deviations of automated (left) and semi-automated (right) segmentation accuracy and bias measures, including similarity index (SI), correct estimation index (CEI), over estimation index (OEI), and under estimation index (UEI) for cerebral gray matter (light gray), cerebral white matter (black), and CSF (gray).</p

Mean tissue volumes and 95% CL (mm³) using automated, semi-automated, and the reference manually segmented approaches in 10 high risk ELBW infants studied at 38 weeks PMA.

<p>Mean tissue volumes and 95% CL (mm³) using automated, semi-automated, and the reference manually segmented approaches in 10 high risk ELBW infants studied at 38 weeks PMA.</p

Mean volumes and 95% confidence limits (CL) of manually segmented structures in 20 high risk ELBW infants studied at 38 weeks PMA.

<p>Mean volumes and 95% confidence limits (CL) of manually segmented structures in 20 high risk ELBW infants studied at 38 weeks PMA.</p