1,005 research outputs found

    Building an effective marketing model for Native American casinos

    Full text link
    In 1987 the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that, as sovereign political entities, federally recognized Native American tribal entities could operate gaming facilities free of state regulation. Soon after, Congress introduced the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which maps out the conditions under which Native American tribal entities are permitted to operate casinos and bingo parlors (Kilby, Fox, & Lucas, 2005). These terms and conditions for Native American casinos under IGRA regulation are Class II gaming methods. Class II gaming is defined as the game of chance commonly known as bingo (regardless of electronic, computer, or other technological aid) (Kilby et al., 2005). Class II gaming also includes non-banked card games; that is, games that are played exclusively against other players rather than against the house or a player acting as a bank. The most common form of non-banked card games are poker games (Kilby et al., 2005). The IGRA specifically excludes slot machines or electronic facsimiles of any game of chance from the definition of Class II games (Kilby et al, 2005). Tribes retain their authority to conduct, license, and regulate Class II gaming so long as the state in which the tribe is located permits such gaming for any purpose and the tribal government adopts a gaming ordinance approved by the Commission. Tribal governments are responsible for regulating Class II gaming with commission oversight. Native American casinos have the option to create a state compact to allow Class III games such as roulette, black jack, and craps (Kilby et. al., 2005). This allows the state in which the tribe operates to collect a percentage of the revenues generated by the compacted games. With the addition of new gaming options, it is important to implement a marketing model that will satisfy the new gaming market that is being tapped into with the addition of Class III games

    Cooperative Enforcement: The Lansing Plan

    Get PDF

    Cooperative Enforcement: The Lansing Plan

    Get PDF

    Solvable senescence model with positive mutations

    Full text link
    We build upon our previous analytical results for the Penna model of senescence to include positive mutations. We investigate whether a small but non-zero positive mutation rate gives qualitatively different results to the traditional Penna model in which no positive mutations are considered. We find that the high-lifespan tail of the distribution is radically changed in structure, but that there is not much effect on the bulk of the population. Th e mortality plateau that we found previously for a stochastic generalization of the Penna model is stable to a small positive mutation rate.Comment: 3 figure

    MicroRNAs mir‐184 and let‐7 alter Drosophila metabolism and longevity

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140032/1/acel12673.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140032/2/acel12673-sup-0002-FigS1-S8.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140032/3/acel12673_am.pd

    More than just hormones: H295R cells as predictors of reproductive toxicity

    Get PDF
    AbstractMany of the commonly observed reproductive toxicities associated with therapeutic compounds can be traced to a disruption of the steroidogenic pathway. We sought to develop an in vitro assay that would predict reproductive toxicity and be high throughput in nature. H295R cells, previously validated as having an intact and functional steroidogenic pathway, were treated with 83 known-positive and 79 known-negative proprietary and public-domain compounds. The assay measured the expression of the key enzymes STAR, 3βHSD2, CYP17A1, CYP11B2, CYP19A1, CYP21A2, and CYP11A1 and the hormones DHEA, progesterone, testosterone, and cortisol. We found that a Random Forest model yielded a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) of 0.845, with sensitivity of 0.724 and specificity of 0.758 for predicting in vivo reproductive toxicity with this in vitro assay system
    corecore