9 research outputs found
ISLES 2016 and 2017-Benchmarking ischemic stroke lesion outcome prediction based on multispectral MRI
Performance of models highly depend not only on the used algorithm but also the data set it was applied to. This makes the comparison of newly developed tools to previously published approaches difficult. Either researchers need to implement others' algorithms first, to establish an adequate benchmark on their data, or a direct comparison of new and old techniques is infeasible. The Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) challenge, which has ran now consecutively for 3 years, aims to address this problem of comparability. ISLES 2016 and 2017 focused on lesion outcome prediction after ischemic stroke: By providing a uniformly pre-processed data set, researchers from all over the world could apply their algorithm directly. A total of nine teams participated in ISLES 2015, and 15 teams participated in ISLES 2016. Their performance was evaluated in a fair and transparent way to identify the state-of-the-art among all submissions. Top ranked teams almost always employed deep learning tools, which were predominately convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Despite the great efforts, lesion outcome prediction persists challenging. The annotated data set remains publicly available and new approaches can be compared directly via the online evaluation system, serving as a continuing benchmark (www.isles-challenge.org).Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal (scholarship number PD/BD/113968/2015). FCT with the UID/EEA/04436/2013, by FEDER funds through COMPETE 2020, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941. NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (T90DA022759/R90DA023427) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) of the National Institutes of Health under award number 5T32EB1680. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. PAC-PRECISE-LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-016394. FEDER-POR Lisboa 2020-Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa PORTUGAL 2020 and Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia. GPU computing resources provided by the MGH and BWH Center for Clinical Data Science Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Sciences funded by Germany's Excellence Initiative [DFG GSC 235/2]. National Research National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) MSIT, NRF-2016R1C1B1012002, MSIT, No. 2014R1A4A1007895, NRF-2017R1A2B4008956 Swiss National Science Foundation-DACH 320030L_163363
Interpretable Vertebral Fracture Quantification via Anchor-Free Landmarks Localization
Vertebral body compression fractures are early signs of osteoporosis. Though
these fractures are visible on Computed Tomography (CT) images, they are
frequently missed by radiologists in clinical settings. Prior research on
automatic methods of vertebral fracture classification proves its reliable
quality; however, existing methods provide hard-to-interpret outputs and
sometimes fail to process cases with severe abnormalities such as highly
pathological vertebrae or scoliosis. We propose a new two-step algorithm to
localize the vertebral column in 3D CT images and then detect individual
vertebrae and quantify fractures in 2D simultaneously. We train neural networks
for both steps using a simple 6-keypoints based annotation scheme, which
corresponds precisely to the current clinical recommendation. Our algorithm has
no exclusion criteria, processes 3D CT in 2 seconds on a single GPU, and
provides an interpretable and verifiable output. The method approaches
expert-level performance and demonstrates state-of-the-art results in vertebrae
3D localization (the average error is 1 mm), vertebrae 2D detection (precision
and recall are 0.99), and fracture identification (ROC AUC at the patient level
is up to 0.96). Our anchor-free vertebra detection network shows excellent
generalizability on a new domain by achieving ROC AUC 0.95, sensitivity 0.85,
specificity 0.9 on a challenging VerSe dataset with many unseen vertebra types.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2005.1196
Recommended from our members
Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different
degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous
histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic
core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also
portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by
varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic
resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties.
Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that
make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount
of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when
evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression.
Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the
various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis
towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the
state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image
analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International
Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we
focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in
pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue
of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO
criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI
scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate
the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks,
considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge,
the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously
evolving/growing dataset
Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different
degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous
histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic
core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also
portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by
varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic
resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties.
Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that
make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount
of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when
evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression.
Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the
various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis
towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the
state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image
analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International
Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we
focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in
pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue
of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO
criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI
scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate
the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks,
considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge,
the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously
evolving/growing dataset