4 research outputs found

    Patents, supply of medicines and protection of public health

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCCIÓN: A fin de cumplir con las obligaciones asumidas en la Organización Mundial del Comercio, Argentina comenzó a conceder patentes sobre medicamentos en octubre de 2000. Cerca de 1.000 patentes farmacéuticas fueron concedidas entre 2000 y 2007 OBJETIVOS: caracterizar el patentamiento farmacéutico y, en particular, establecer el tipo de materias protegidas, las aplicaciones terapéuticas y el origen de los titulares de patentes otorgadas; examinar el posible impacto del nuevo régimen de patentamiento sobre las adquisiciones públicas de medicamentos; clarificar en qué situaciones y con qué procedimientos pueden otorgarse licencias obligatorias, especialmente en casos de emergencia sanitaria; y examinar qué implicaciones tiene el marco legal nacional e internacional de la propiedad intelectual sobre las políticas de salud pública. MÉTODOS: Se diseñó y analizó una base de datos con las patentes concedidas en el período indicado. Se revisaron los procedimientos de adquisición de medicamentos del Ministerio de Salud de la Nación y el marco legal aplicable, así como las negociaciones internacionales en curso. RESULTADOS: casi la totalidad de las patentes otorgadas pertenecen a empresas extranjeras; la mayoría se refiere a enfermedades del sistema nervioso e incluyen reivindicaciones del tipo "Markush". La mayoría de las patentes son de derivados o variantes de productos existentes (sales, formulaciones, polimorfos, etc.). CONCLUSIONES: El estudio concluye con recomendaciones, sobre los procedimientos de adquisición, concesión de licencias obligatorias y la transparencia del sistema de patentes en lo concerniente a medicamentos.INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with its obligations in the World Trade Organization, Argentina started to grant patents on pharmaceutical products in October 2000. In the period 2000-2007 near one thousand pharmaceutical patents were granted. OBJECTIVES: To characterize pharmaceutical patenting and, in particular, to establish the type of protected subject matter, the therapeutic uses and the origin of patent owners; to examine the possible impact of the new patenting regime on public procurement of medicines; to clarify in which situations and with which procedures compulsory licenses can be granted, particularly in cases of health emergencies; to examine the implications of the national and international legal framework of intellectual property on public health policies. METHODS: A data base with the patents granted in the above-mentioned period was designed and analyzed, the procurement procedures of the National Ministry of Health were studied, as well as the applicable legal framework and ongoing international negotiations. RESULTS: The study revealed that almost all granted patents belong to foreign companies. The majority refers to diseases of the nervous system and includes 'Markush-type'. In addition, the great majority of patents relate to derivatives or variants of existing products (salts, formulations, polymorphs, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes with recommendations, about procurement procedures, the grant of compulsory licenses and the transparency of the patent system as regards medicines.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of the 10- and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Argentina.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Since the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-10) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) were recently licensed for use in Argentina, both vaccines were evaluated to estimate the costs, health benefits and cost-effectiveness of adding a PCV to the routine child immunization schedule. METHODOLOGY: The integrated TRIVAC vaccine cost-effectiveness model from Pan American Health Organization's ProVac Initiative (Version 1.0.65) was used to assess the health outcomes of 20 successive cohorts from birth to 5 years of age. PCV-10 and PCV-13 were each compared to a scenario assuming no PCV vaccination. A 3+1 (three doses+booster) schedule and a vaccination price of US20.75perdosewasassumedinthebasecaseforbothvaccines.RESULTS:IntroductionofPCV13ratherthanPCV10wouldincreasethenumberoflifeyearsgained(LYG)byatleast10 20.75 per dose was assumed in the base case for both vaccines. RESULTS: Introduction of PCV-13 rather than PCV-10 would increase the number of life years gained (LYG) by at least 10%. The number of LYG (and LYG after adjustment for DALY morbidity weights) was 56,882 (64,252) for PCV-10 compared to 65,038 (71,628) for PCV-13. From the health system perspective, the cost per DALY averted was US 8973 and US10,948forPCV10andPCV13respectively,andUS 10,948 for PCV-10 and PCV-13 respectively, and US 8546 and US10,510respectively,afterincorporatingcostssavedbyhouseholds.WhenPCV13wascomparedtoPCV10directly,theadditionalbenefitsofPCV13wasconferredatacostofUS 10,510 respectively, after incorporating costs saved by households. When PCV13 was compared to PCV10 directly, the additional benefits of PCV-13 was conferred at a cost of US 28,147 per DALY averted. Cost-effectiveness was influenced mainly by vaccine price, serotype replacement, pneumonia mortality and discount rate. CONCLUSION: Routine vaccination against S. pneumoniae in Argentina would be cost-effective with either PCV-10 or PCV-13. PCV-13, with higher coverage of local serotypes, would prevent more cases of pneumonia, invasive pneumococcal disease, sequelae and deaths with a higher number of LYG and DALYs averted, but PCV-10, due its higher impact in the prevention of AOM, would save more costs to the healthcare system
    corecore