Anticoagulation therapy in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the Registry of Atrial Fibrillation To Investigate the Implementation of New Guidelines (RAFTING)

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation aged 75 years or older have a CHA2DS2VASc score that dictates oral anticoagulants. We recorded physicians' anticoagulation attitudes in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and assessed the impact of stroke and bleeding risk. Methods: Atrial Fibrillation To Investigate the Implementation of New Guidelines, a countrywide prospective registry performed in Greece during 2010, a period when only vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) were available, enrolled 1127 patients with atrial fibrillation diagnosis during Emergency Departments visit in 31 representative hospitals; 807 patients had known atrial fibrillation and of those, 342 aged 75 years or older. We recorded preadmission anticoagulation treatment and associated it with clinical characteristics and stroke/bleeding risk. Results: Patients on VKA (n = 207; 61%) were younger (81 ± 4 vs. 83 ± 5; P < 0.001) but no other significant differences were noticed, including mean CHA2DS2VASc (high: 2-4, very high: >4) or modified HASBLED (low: 0-2, high: >2) scores. VKA were prescribed in 65% of patients with very high CHA2DS2VASc score as compared with 55% of those with high score (P = 0.065). VKA were used equally in low or high-modified HASBLED score (61% vs. 59%; P = 0.78). The interaction between CHA2DS2VASc and HASBLED was significant (P < 0.001) in patients on VKA; in patients with low HASBLED, VKA use was similar in high versus very high CHA2DS2VASc score (58 vs. 64%), whereas in patients with high HASBLED, VKA use tended to be higher in very high versus high CHA2DS2VASc score (66 vs. 43%). Conclusion: In this countrywide atrial fibrillation registry, 61% of elderly patients received VKA, a decision driven mainly by stroke risk. VKA use was not higher in patients with low bleeding risk. © 2017 Italian Federation of Cardiology. All rights reserved

Hemodynamic effects of captopril and isosorbide mononitrate started early in acute myocardial infarction: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to study the hemodynamic effects of orally administered captopril and isosorbide mononitrate in suspected acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Early treatment with converting enzyme inhibitors and nitrates in acute myocardial infarction may limit infarct expansion and prevent left ventricular dilation. METHODS: In a double-blind study, 81 patients were randomized within 36 h of the onset of symptoms of suspected acute myocardial infarction to 1 month of oral captopril (6.25 mg initial dose, followed 2 h later by 12.5 mg and continuing with 12.5 mg three times daily), isosorbide mononitrate (initial dose 20 mg followed by 20 mg three times daily) or matching placebo. The effects of treatment on changes from baseline in mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance were assessed noninvasively using Doppler echocardiography 1 h after the first dose, 1 week after infarction and at 6 weeks (that is, 2 weeks after the scheduled end of trial treatment). RESULTS: One hour after the start of treatment, blood pressure was reduced by approximately 10% with both captopril and isosorbide mononitrate, but this difference did not persist at 1 week. Captopril was associated with a significant increase in cardiac output compared with placebo of 13 +/- 3% at 1 h (p < 0.01), 23 +/- 5% at 1 week (p < 0.001) and 22 +/- 6% (p < 0.05) at 6 weeks (2 weeks after the end of trial treatment). This increase in cardiac output with captopril was mainly due to a substantial and sustained increase in stroke volume, although there was also a small increase in heart rate at 1 week. Both captopril and isosorbide mononitrate reduced systemic vascular resistance within 1 h of the start of treatment, but only the effect of captopril was sustained (perhaps because the three-times daily nitrate regimen induced tolerance). Study treatment was well tolerated, and the incidence of withdrawal of study treatment for hypotension was not significantly different from that with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the hemodynamic effects of both captopril and isosorbide mononitrate are well tolerated in the acute phase of myocardial infarction and that captopril favorably influences cardiac function

In-hospital mortality of habitual cigarette smokers after acute myocardial infarction - The `smoker's paradox' in a countrywide study

Aims Habitual cigarette smokers, paradoxically, present improved short-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction, a phenomenon often termed ‘smoker’s paradox’. We sought to examine cigarette smokers’ post-infarction survival advantage in a countrywide survey of unselected, consecutive patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results The study population was derived from the registry of the Hellenic study of acute myocardial infarction, which recruited 7433 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction from 76, out of a total of 86, hospitals countrywide. Cigarette smokers presented with lower unadjusted mortality rates (7.4% vs 14.5%,, P<0.001), were younger, predominantly of male gender and were less likely to suffer from diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. When all univariate predictors of poor outcome were included as covariates in multivariate analysis, smoking status was not significantly associated with inhospital mortality (relative risk = 1.12. 95% CI=0.86 1.44, P=0.399). The beneficial effect of thrombolytic therapy was independent of the smoking status ill both univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusion Unadjusted mortality rates are significantly lower in smokers, but age accounted for much of their seemingly improved outcome. When a number of additional clinical variables were taken into consideration, no significant influence of habitual smoking on early outcome following acute myocardial infarction was observed. (Eur Heart. J 2001; 22: 776-784, doi: 10053/euhj.2000.2315) (C) 2001 The European Society of Cardiology

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Practical Considerations on the Choice of Agent and Dosing

Direct or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have recently revolutionized the field of antithrombotic therapy for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Randomized controlled trials have shown that these agents have at least comparable efficacy with vitamin K antagonists along with superior safety, at least in what concerns intracranial hemorrhage. As a result, NOACs are indicated as first-line anticoagulation therapy for NVAF patients with at least one risk factor for stroke or systemic embolism. The rapid introduction, however, of NOACs in a field dominated for decades by vitamin antagonists and the variety of agents and dosing schemes may create difficulties in decision making. In the present article, we attempt to determine a practical approach to the choice of agent and dose in different clinical scenarios by considering not only the results of seminal randomized trials and post hoc analyses but also data from real-world patient populations as well as the recently available possibility of rapid NOAC reversal. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Randomized controlled trial of oral captopril, of oral isosorbide mononitrate and of intravenous magnesium sulphate started early in acute myocardial infarction: safety and haemodynamic effects. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Pilot Study Investigators.

The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to assess the haemodynamic effects, safety and tolerability in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of one month of oral captopril, one month of oral isosorbide mononitrate and 24 h of intravenous magnesium. It was carried out in four United Kingdom and six Polish hospitals in consecutive phases: oral captopril vs oral mononitrate vs placebo were compared among 400 patients in a 'three-way' study; and then oral captopril vs placebo and oral mononitrate vs placebo were compared among 474 patients in '2 x 2' and '2 x 2 x 2' factorial studies (with 208 patients in the latter study also randomized between intravenous magnesium and open control). The factorial studies differed from the three-way study in that one group of patients was allocated both oral captopril and oral mononitrate, a higher maintenance dose of captopril was used (following the same initial dose), and once daily controlled-release mononitrate was used. In the three-way study, the mean of the lowest systolic blood pressures recorded during the first 4 h after randomization were (mmHg +/- standard error): 104 +/- 2 captopril vs 105 +/- 1 mononitrate vs 112 +/- 2 placebo (P < 0.001 for captopril or for mononitrate vs placebo), and in the factorial studies were 105 +/- 1 captopril vs 110 +/- 1 placebo (P < 0.01) and 106 +/- 1 mononitrate vs 108 +/- 1 placebo (NS). There was an excess of hypotension recorded among patients allocated active treatment (captopril > mononitrate > placebo) and there was a small, but significant, excess of cardiogenic shock with captopril compared with control in the factorial study. However, in these studies, neither captopril nor mononitrate were associated with any overall increase in the incidence of hypotension considered severe enough to lead to treatment being stopped. No other serious complications were observed, and compliance with study tablets at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the active and placebo groups. Patients allocated magnesium in the 2 x 2 x 2 factorial study had a slightly lower mean systolic blood pressure just after the initial 15 min bolus injection (126 +/- 2 magnesium vs 134 +/- 3 control; P < 0.05) but there were no significant differences during the subsequent 24 h maintenance infusion period. Apart from some facial flushing, magnesium did not appear to be associated with any complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS

Randomized controlled trial of oral captopril, of oral isosorbide mononitrate and of intravenous magnesium sulphate started early in acute myocardial infarction: safety and haemodynamic effects. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Pilot Study Investigators.

The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to assess the haemodynamic effects, safety and tolerability in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of one month of oral captopril, one month of oral isosorbide mononitrate and 24 h of intravenous magnesium. It was carried out in four United Kingdom and six Polish hospitals in consecutive phases: oral captopril vs oral mononitrate vs placebo were compared among 400 patients in a 'three-way' study; and then oral captopril vs placebo and oral mononitrate vs placebo were compared among 474 patients in '2 x 2' and '2 x 2 x 2' factorial studies (with 208 patients in the latter study also randomized between intravenous magnesium and open control). The factorial studies differed from the three-way study in that one group of patients was allocated both oral captopril and oral mononitrate, a higher maintenance dose of captopril was used (following the same initial dose), and once daily controlled-release mononitrate was used. In the three-way study, the mean of the lowest systolic blood pressures recorded during the first 4 h after randomization were (mmHg +/- standard error): 104 +/- 2 captopril vs 105 +/- 1 mononitrate vs 112 +/- 2 placebo (P mononitrate > placebo) and there was a small, but significant, excess of cardiogenic shock with captopril compared with control in the factorial study. However, in these studies, neither captopril nor mononitrate were associated with any overall increase in the incidence of hypotension considered severe enough to lead to treatment being stopped. No other serious complications were observed, and compliance with study tablets at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the active and placebo groups. Patients allocated magnesium in the 2 x 2 x 2 factorial study had a slightly lower mean systolic blood pressure just after the initial 15 min bolus injection (126 +/- 2 magnesium vs 134 +/- 3 control; P < 0.05) but there were no significant differences during the subsequent 24 h maintenance infusion period. Apart from some facial flushing, magnesium did not appear to be associated with any complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS

Effects on ventricular arrhythmias of oral captopril and of oral mononitrate started early in acute myocardial infarction: results of a randomised placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the effects of oral vasodilator treatment on ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction. SETTING--Coronary care units at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, and the Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh. PATIENTS--100 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction entered the study at a mean of 13 hours from symptom onset. DESIGN OF INTERVENTION--Double blind randomisation to 4 weeks treatment with captopril (12.5 mg three times a day after a 6.25 mg test dose (n = 32)) or isosorbide mononitrate (20 mg three times a day (n = 31)) or placebo control (n = 37). OUTCOME MEASURES--Ventricular arrhythmic events assessed by 48 hours of Holter monitoring starting at the time of randomisation. RESULTS--The number of ventricular extrasystoles/hour for captopril, mononitrate, and placebo was respectively (median and range) 6 (0-162), 4 (0-38), and 10 (0-932) (2p < 0.02 mononitrate v placebo). The number of episodes of multiple extrasystoles/hour was 0.2 (0-22), 0.3 (0-4), and 0.5 (0-19); (2p < 0.02 mononitrate v placebo). Episodes of ventricular tachycardia showed a non-significant decrease in the captopril and mononitrate groups (mean (SEM) 3.2 (0.8), 2.4 (0.7), and 4.7 (1.3) for the 48 hour period). The incidence of idioventricular rhythm was also reduced in both active treatment groups (28%, 19%, and 46% (2p < 0.05 mononitrate v placebo)). CONCLUSIONS--Oral mononitrate (and perhaps also captopril) seems to reduce the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. The effects on life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation, and on death can only be assessed in a much larger trial