10 research outputs found
We can’t hang out anymore: an analysis of self-other asymmetries and anti-COVID vaccination confidence in Guatemala
I conduct a survey indagating on risk perception and anti-COVID protection measures to 438 Guatemalan citizens of a high range of ages (from less than 18 to more than 60 years old) and middle to upper socio-economic level. I utilized the lottery framework developed by Holt and Laury to elicit behavior at the face of risk in two domains, financial and health. Both the survey and the risk assessments were subject to a self-other framing, in which respondents were asked to answer either on behalf of themselves or of another. Results show that Guatemalans are more risk-taking in the financial domain when deciding for themselves than for another, but both groups reported almost identical risk attitudes in the health domain. The results report a great dissociation between prosocial behavior to stop the COVID-19 spread, were people rank themselves better than others. Data also shows than being vaccinated does not increase economically active behavior, and this paper explains this in relation with the self-other dissociation found
Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: are the comparators important?
In the UK, life extending, end-of-life (EoL) treatments are an exception to standard cost-per-quality-adjusted life year (QALY) thresholds. This implies that greater value is placed on gaining these QALYs, than QALYs gained by the majority of other patient groups treated for anything else in the health system, even for other EoL contexts (such as quality of life (QoL) improvements alone). This paper reports a Person Trade-Off (PTO) study to test whether studies that find societal support for prioritising EoL life extensions can be explained by the severity, in terms of prospective QALYs loss, of the non-terminal comparator scenarios. Eight health scenarios were designed depicting i) QoL improvements for non-EoL temporary (T-QoL) and chronic (C-QoL) health problems and ii) QoL improvements and life extensions (LEs) for EoL health problems. Preferences were elicited from a quota sample of 901 Scottish respondents in 2016 using PTO techniques via Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI). Our results indicate that there is little evidence to suggest that the severity of non-EoL comparator scenarios influence preferences for EoL treatments. Respondents do not appear to have a preference for EoL over non-EoL health gains; instead there is some indication that non-EoL health gains are preferred, particularly when compared to EoL-LE health gains. Comparing between QoL and life extending EoL scenarios, our results suggest QoL improvements are preferred to life extensions. Overall, results challenge current UK EoL policy which gives additional weight to EoL health gains, particularly EoL life extensions in the case of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
Handling data quality issues to estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L value set using a hybrid interval regression approach
Background
The Spanish five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation study was the first to use the EuroQol Valuation Technology protocol, including composite time trade-off (C-TTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCE). In this study, its investigators noticed that some interviewers did not fully explain the C-TTO task to respondents. Evidence from a follow-up study in 2014 confirmed that when interviewers followed the protocol, the distribution of C-TTO responses widened.
Objectives
To handle the data quality issues in the C-TTO responses by estimating a hybrid interval regression model to produce a Spanish EQ-5D-5L value set.
Methods
Four different models were tested. Model 0 integrated C-TTO and DCE responses in a hybrid model and models 1 to 3 altered the interpretation of the C-TTO responses: model 1 allowed for censoring of the C-TTO responses, whereas model 2 incorporated interval responses and model 3 included the interviewer-specific protocol violations. For external validation, the predictions of the four models were compared with those of the follow-up study using the Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient.
Results
This stepwise approach to modeling C-TTO and DCE responses improved the concordance between the valuation and follow-up studies (concordance correlation coefficient: 0.948 [model 0], 0.958 [model 1], 0.952 [model 2], and 0.989 [model 3]). We recommend the estimates from model 3, because its hybrid interval regression model addresses the data quality issues found in the valuation study.
Conclusions
Protocol violations may occur in any valuation study; handling them in the analysis can improve external validity. The resulting EQ-5D-5L value set (model 3) can be applied to inform Spanish health technology assessments
¿Qué es una intervención sanitaria eficiente en España en 2020?
Hace más de 15 años que en Gaceta Sanitaria se publicĂł el artĂculo titulado «¿QuĂ© es una tecnologĂa sanitaria eficiente en España?». El creciente interĂ©s por fijar el precio de las nuevas tecnologĂas en funciĂłn del
valor que estas proporcionan a los sistemas de salud y la experiencia acumulada por los paĂses de nuestro
entorno hacen oportuno revisar qué es una intervención sanitaria eficiente en España en el año 2020.
El análisis de coste-efectividad sigue siendo el método de referencia para maximizar los resultados en
salud de la sociedad con los recursos disponibles. La interpretaciĂłn de sus resultados requiere establecer
unos valores de referencia que sirvan de guĂa sobre lo que constituye un valor razonable para el sistema
sanitario. Los umbrales de eficiencia deben ser flexibles y dinámicos, y actualizarse periódicamente. Su
aplicación debe estar basada en la gradualidad y la transparencia, considerando, además, otros factores
que reflejen las preferencias sociales. Aunque la fijaciĂłn de los umbrales corresponde a los decisores
polĂticos, en España puede ser razonable utilizar unos valores de referencia como punto de partida que
podrĂan estar comprendidos entre los 25.000 y los 60.000 euros por año de vida ajustado por calidad.
No obstante, en la actualidad, más que la determinación de las cifras exactas de dicho umbral, la cuestión clave es si el Sistema Nacional de Salud está preparado y dispuesto a implantar un modelo de pago
basado en el valor, que contribuya a lograr la gradualidad en las decisiones de financiaciĂłn y, sobre todo,
a mejorar la previsibilidad, la consistencia y la transparencia del proceso.Fifteen years ago, Gaceta Sanitaria published the article entitled “What is an efficient health technology in
Spain?” The growing interest in setting the price of new technologies based on the value they provide to
health systems and the experience accumulated by the countries in our environment make it opportune
to review what constitutes an efficient health intervention in Spain in 2020. Cost-effectiveness analysis
continues to be the reference method to maximize social health outcomes with the available resources.
The interpretation of its results requires establishing reference values that serve as a guide on what
constitutes a reasonable value for the health care system. Efficiency thresholds must be flexible and
dynamic, and they need to be updated periodically. Its application should be based on and transparency,
and consider other factors that reflect social preferences. Although setting thresholds is down to political
decision-makers, in Spain it could be reasonable to use thresholds of 25,000 and 60,000 Euros per QALY.
However, currently, in addition to determining exactfigures for the threshold,the key question is whether
the Spanish National Health System is able and willing to implement a payment model based on value,
towards achieving gradual financing decisions and, above all, to improve the predictability, consistency
and transparency of the process
We can’t hang out anymore: an analysis of self-other asymmetries and anti-COVID vaccination confidence in Guatemala
I conduct a survey indagating on risk perception and anti-COVID protection measures to 438 Guatemalan citizens of a high range of ages (from less than 18 to more than 60 years old) and middle to upper socio-economic level. I utilized the lottery framework developed by Holt and Laury to elicit behavior at the face of risk in two domains, financial and health. Both the survey and the risk assessments were subject to a self-other framing, in which respondents were asked to answer either on behalf of themselves or of another. Results show that Guatemalans are more risk-taking in the financial domain when deciding for themselves than for another, but both groups reported almost identical risk attitudes in the health domain. The results report a great dissociation between prosocial behavior to stop the COVID-19 spread, were people rank themselves better than others. Data also shows than being vaccinated does not increase economically active behavior, and this paper explains this in relation with the self-other dissociation found
Peer effects in health valuation: the relation between rating of contemporaries' health and own health
Background: Most health valuation studies assume that individuals’ health valuations do not depend on social
comparisons. However, there is some evidence that this assumption is not satisfied in practice. This paper tests
whether self-rated health by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is related to how one perceives the health of
one’s contemporaries, while accounting for one’s health as classified by the EQ-5D classification system.
Methods: In a large sample (n = 1500), representative of the general public, we use a VAS to rate respondents’ own
health and their assessment of their contemporaries’ health. In addition, we directly ask them whether they
perceive their health to be better, the same, or worse than their contemporaries, and we measure their own health
according to the EQ-5D-5 L.
Results: We find a positive relationship between own health rating and contemporaries’ health rating, after
controlling for the respondents’ own health as classified according to the EQ-5D. Furthermore, we observe a
discrepancy between relative health vis-Ă -vis age peers as measured by an ordinal comparison and relative health
as measured by a VAS. Finally, respondents, especially women, tended to overestimate the health of other people
of their age.
Conclusions: We provide evidence that people’s own health rating is related to the perception of health of
contemporaries. Our results indicate that knowledge about a respondent’s perception of others’ health is useful in
explaining health state valuations
Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: are the comparators important?
In the UK, life extending, end-of-life (EoL) treatments are an exception to standard cost-per-quality-adjusted life year (QALY) thresholds. This implies that greater value is placed on gaining these QALYs, than QALYs gained by the majority of other patient groups treated for anything else in the health system, even for other EoL contexts (such as quality of life (QoL) improvements alone). This paper reports a Person Trade-Off (PTO) study to test whether studies that find societal support for prioritising EoL life extensions can be explained by the severity, in terms of prospective QALYs loss, of the non-terminal comparator scenarios. Eight health scenarios were designed depicting i) QoL improvements for non-EoL temporary (T-QoL) and chronic (C-QoL) health problems and ii) QoL improvements and life extensions (LEs) for EoL health problems. Preferences were elicited from a quota sample of 901 Scottish respondents in 2016 using PTO techniques via Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI). Our results indicate that there is little evidence to suggest that the severity of non-EoL comparator scenarios influence preferences for EoL treatments. Respondents do not appear to have a preference for EoL over non-EoL health gains; instead there is some indication that non-EoL health gains are preferred, particularly when compared to EoL-LE health gains. Comparing between QoL and life extending EoL scenarios, our results suggest QoL improvements are preferred to life extensions. Overall, results challenge current UK EoL policy which gives additional weight to EoL health gains, particularly EoL life extensions in the case of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
Do time trade-off values fully capture attitudes that are relevant to health-related choices?
Previous research has shown that demographics, beliefs, and self-reported own health influence TTO values. Our hypothesis
is that attitudes towards length and quality of life influence TTO values, but should no longer affect a set of related choices
that are based on respondents’ own TTO scores. A representative sample of 1339 respondents was asked their level of agreement to four statements relating to the importance of quality and length of life. Respondents then went on to value 4 EQ-5D
5L states using an online interactive survey and a related set of 6 pairwise health-related choice questions, set up, so that
respondents should be indifferent between choice options. We explored the impact of attitudes using regression analysis for
TTO values and a logit model for choices. TTO values were correlated with the attitudes and were found to have a residual
impact on the choices. In particular, those respondents who preferred quality of life over length of life gave less weight to
the differences in years and more weight to differences in quality of life in these choice. We conclude that although the TTO
responses reflect attitudes, these attitudes continue to affect health-related choices
Do time trade-off values fully capture attitudes that are relevant to health-related choices?
Previous research has shown that demographics, beliefs, and self-reported own health influence TTO values. Our hypothesis
is that attitudes towards length and quality of life influence TTO values, but should no longer affect a set of related choices
that are based on respondents’ own TTO scores. A representative sample of 1339 respondents was asked their level of agreement to four statements relating to the importance of quality and length of life. Respondents then went on to value 4 EQ-5D
5L states using an online interactive survey and a related set of 6 pairwise health-related choice questions, set up, so that
respondents should be indifferent between choice options. We explored the impact of attitudes using regression analysis for
TTO values and a logit model for choices. TTO values were correlated with the attitudes and were found to have a residual
impact on the choices. In particular, those respondents who preferred quality of life over length of life gave less weight to
the differences in years and more weight to differences in quality of life in these choice. We conclude that although the TTO
responses reflect attitudes, these attitudes continue to affect health-related choices
¿Qué es una intervención sanitaria eficiente en España en 2020?
Hace más de 15 años que en Gaceta Sanitaria se publicĂł el artĂculo titulado «¿QuĂ© es una tecnologĂa sanitaria eficiente en España?». El creciente interĂ©s por fijar el precio de las nuevas tecnologĂas en funciĂłn del
valor que estas proporcionan a los sistemas de salud y la experiencia acumulada por los paĂses de nuestro
entorno hacen oportuno revisar qué es una intervención sanitaria eficiente en España en el año 2020.
El análisis de coste-efectividad sigue siendo el método de referencia para maximizar los resultados en
salud de la sociedad con los recursos disponibles. La interpretaciĂłn de sus resultados requiere establecer
unos valores de referencia que sirvan de guĂa sobre lo que constituye un valor razonable para el sistema
sanitario. Los umbrales de eficiencia deben ser flexibles y dinámicos, y actualizarse periódicamente. Su
aplicación debe estar basada en la gradualidad y la transparencia, considerando, además, otros factores
que reflejen las preferencias sociales. Aunque la fijaciĂłn de los umbrales corresponde a los decisores
polĂticos, en España puede ser razonable utilizar unos valores de referencia como punto de partida que
podrĂan estar comprendidos entre los 25.000 y los 60.000 euros por año de vida ajustado por calidad.
No obstante, en la actualidad, más que la determinación de las cifras exactas de dicho umbral, la cuestión clave es si el Sistema Nacional de Salud está preparado y dispuesto a implantar un modelo de pago
basado en el valor, que contribuya a lograr la gradualidad en las decisiones de financiaciĂłn y, sobre todo,
a mejorar la previsibilidad, la consistencia y la transparencia del proceso.Fifteen years ago, Gaceta Sanitaria published the article entitled “What is an efficient health technology in
Spain?” The growing interest in setting the price of new technologies based on the value they provide to
health systems and the experience accumulated by the countries in our environment make it opportune
to review what constitutes an efficient health intervention in Spain in 2020. Cost-effectiveness analysis
continues to be the reference method to maximize social health outcomes with the available resources.
The interpretation of its results requires establishing reference values that serve as a guide on what
constitutes a reasonable value for the health care system. Efficiency thresholds must be flexible and
dynamic, and they need to be updated periodically. Its application should be based on and transparency,
and consider other factors that reflect social preferences. Although setting thresholds is down to political
decision-makers, in Spain it could be reasonable to use thresholds of 25,000 and 60,000 Euros per QALY.
However, currently, in addition to determining exactfigures for the threshold,the key question is whether
the Spanish National Health System is able and willing to implement a payment model based on value,
towards achieving gradual financing decisions and, above all, to improve the predictability, consistency
and transparency of the process