25 research outputs found

    Solid State Structure of Thorium(IV) Complexes with Common Aminopolycarboxylate Ligands

    No full text

    A Highly Adjustable Coordination System: Nanotubular and Molecular Cage Species in Uranyl Ion Complexes with Kemp’s Triacid

    No full text
    A unique example of topology tailoring in a uranyl–organic system is provided by the three-pronged Kemp’s tricarboxylate ligand. While unexceptional one-dimensional polymers are formed with uranyl alone under solvo-hydrothermal conditions, addition of Ni<sup>2+</sup> ions yields the nanotubular species [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Ni­(L)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>∞</sub>, with a hydrophilic inner cavity lined by hydrated Ni<sup>2+</sup> ions, and a hydrophobic outer surface. The further presence of 2,2′-bipyridine brings about the trapping of Ni<sup>2+</sup> ions into counterions and formation of the octanuclear pseudocubic cage [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>(L)<sub>6</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2–</sup>

    Lanthanide Ion Complexes with 2-, 3-, or 4-Sulfobenzoate and Cucurbit[6]uril

    No full text
    The reaction of lanthanide nitrate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, or chloride salts with the three positional isomers of sulfobenzoic acid (SBH<sub>2</sub>) in the presence of cucurbit[6]­uril (CB6) under hydrothermal conditions yielded 13 complexes which were crystallographically characterized. The ortho isomer gave a series of one-dimensional polymeric complexes of columnar shape, {[Ln­(2-SB)­(NO<sub>3</sub>)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CB6}·<i>x</i>H<sub>2</sub>O [isomorphous for Ln = La (<b>1</b>) and Ce (<b>2</b>), <i>x</i> = 10 or 11], {[Nd­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>]­[Nd­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]­CB6}·2NO<sub>3</sub>·7.5H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>3</b>), and {[Ln­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CB6}·2NO<sub>3</sub>·<i>x</i>H<sub>2</sub>O [isomorphous for Ln = Eu (<b>4</b>), Dy (<b>5</b>), Er (<b>6</b>), and Yb (<b>7</b>), <i>x</i> = 5 or 6]. These compounds all comprise carboxylate-bridged dinuclear units connecting the CB6 molecules through lanthanide–carbonyl coordination, and they differ by sulfonate bonding and formation of a chelate ring being only present in <b>1</b>–<b>3</b>. In contrast, [Lu­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>7</sub>]<sub>2</sub>·CB6·2NO<sub>3</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>8</b>) does not display sulfonate and carbonyl coordination, the carboxylate group being monodentate and the complex species being held as a lid over the CB6 portal by hydrogen bonding. The complexes obtained from erbium trifluoromethanesulfonate and chloride salts, {[Er­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CB6}·2CF<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>·2.5H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>9</b>) and [Er­(2-SB)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>7</sub>]<sub>2</sub>·CB6·2Cl·6H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>10</b>), present the same features as <b>4</b>–<b>7</b> and <b>8</b>, respectively. The meta isomer is in the form of the carboxybenzosulfonate 3-SBH<sup>–</sup>, with the carboxylic acid retaining its proton, in the isomorphous complexes {[Ln­(3-SBH)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CB6}·4NO<sub>3</sub> [Ln = Ce (<b>11</b>) or Nd (<b>12</b>)]. These complexes display the feature, unusual in this series, of coordination by the monodentate sulfonate group only. A columnar assembly is formed by coordination of each metal ion to two CB6 molecules, the 3-SBH<sup>–</sup> ligand having no role in the polymer formation. Finally, the para isomer is only coordinated by the chelating carboxylate group in [Nd<sub>1.5</sub>(4-SB)­(CB6)­(NO<sub>3</sub>)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6.5</sub>]·4-SBH·4-SBH<sub>1.5</sub>·15H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>13</b>)

    Uranyl Ion Complexes with Ammoniobenzoates as Assemblers for Cucurbit[6]uril Molecules

    No full text
    The crystal structures of the complexes formed under hydrothermal conditions by uranyl ions with 4-aminobenzoic (HL1), 4-amino-3-methylbenzoic (HL2), 4-(aminomethyl)benzoic (HL3), and 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic (HL4) acids, in the presence of cucurbit[6]uril (CB6), have been determined. These ligands have been chosen because, in their zwitterionic form, they display both a metal-complexing carboxylate group and an ammonium group able to associate with CB6 through ion-dipole and hydrogen bonding interactions. The complexes [H<sub>2</sub>NMe<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>[(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(L1)<sub>2</sub>O(OH)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sub>2</sub>·CB6·15H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>1</b>) and [H<sub>2</sub>NMe<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>[(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(L2)<sub>2</sub>O(OH)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sub>2</sub>·CB6·17H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>2</b>) were obtained in the presence of dimethylformamide, which gives dimethylammonium ions in situ. The latter are held at the CB6 portals, while the tetranuclear uranyl complex with the aminobenzoate anions is not bound to CB6. The neutral, ammonium-containing form of the ligand is present in [UO<sub>2</sub>(HL3)(OH)(HCOO)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sub>2</sub>·2CB6·2DMF·14H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>3</b>), in which the di(μ<sub>2</sub>-hydroxo)-bridged, dinuclear uranyl complex displays two diverging, monodentate HL3 ligands. The latter are associated with two CB6 molecules to give a dumbbell-shaped supramolecular assembly. Three CB6 molecules are assembled around a tetranuclear uranyl complex in [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(HL3)<sub>2</sub>(L3)O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]·2CB6·0.5CB8·HL3·NO<sub>3</sub>·20H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>4</b>), with two of them being bridging and giving rise to a one-dimensional, linear supramolecular architecture. Finally, the 3-amino substituted ligand HL4 gives the highly symmetric complex [UO<sub>2</sub>(HL4)(L4)<sub>2</sub>]·3CB6·16H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>5</b>), in which the uranyl ion is chelated by three carboxylate groups. Three CB6 molecules are assembled around the planar complex to give a triangular, discrete species. In compounds <b>3</b>–<b>5</b>, the usual packing of CB6 molecules into columns or layers is not retained as it is frequently in the presence of uranyl complexes. This is due to the CB6-assembling role of the heterodifunctional ligands, which hold the CB6 molecules at the periphery of mono-, di-, or tetranuclear uranyl complexes of quite usual, planar geometry

    Increasing Complexity in the Uranyl Ion–Kemp’s Triacid System: From One- and Two-Dimensional Polymers to Uranyl–Copper(II) Dodeca- and Hexadecanuclear Species

    No full text
    Kemp’s triacid (<i>cis</i>,<i>cis</i>-1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, LH<sub>3</sub>) has recently been shown to be a versatile ligand for the uranyl ion, with the presence of additional nickel­(II) cations allowing isolation of nanotubular and cage species in particular. The high sensitivity of the uranyl–LH<sub>3</sub> system to variations in the experimental conditions was the incentive for the present investigation of different solvents as organic components in solvo-hydrothermal synthesis methods and of different additional species (metal cations, 2,2′-bipyridine). Reaction of LH<sub>3</sub> with uranyl ions under purely hydrothermal conditions gives [UO<sub>2</sub>(LH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>1</b>), an unremarkable mononuclear complex. In the presence of manganese nitrate and in water–THF or water–methanol, respectively, the complexes [Hbipy]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]­·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O­·0.25THF (<b>2</b>) and [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(MeL)<sub>2</sub>­(OH)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)]­·8MeOH (<b>3</b>) were obtained; <b>2</b> is a two-dimensional (2D) species, while <b>3</b> is one-dimensional (1D) and contains the monoester derivative of LH<sub>3</sub>, formed in situ. Another 2D compound, [UO<sub>2</sub>Tb­{(L)<sub>2</sub>H}­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>4</b>), crystallizes in the presence of terbium­(III) nitrate. The three complexes [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>{(L)<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>}­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>5</b>), [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>{(L)<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>}­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­·3H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6</b>), and [Cu<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>)­(bipy)<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub>2</sub>]­[(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>{(L)<sub>6</sub>H}­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sub>2</sub>­·4H<sub>2</sub>O­·7THF (<b>7</b>), which were obtained in the presence of copper­(II) or nickel­(II) cations, all contain homometallic octanuclear cage-like species analogous to that previously reported. The most interesting complexes in this series, [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>(L)<sub>8</sub>­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>16</sub>]­·9H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>8</b>) and [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10</sub>Cu<sub>6</sub>­(L)<sub>10</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>7</sub>] (<b>9</b>), were obtained together in water–THF and in the presence of copper­(II) cations. Compound <b>8</b> is a dodecanuclear metallacycle comprising four (UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cu trinuclear subunits, in which the central copper atom is bound to two uranyl oxo groups, arranged in helical geometry. Compound <b>9</b> is a large, hexadecanuclear cage-like species devoid of any crystallographic symmetry. In both <b>8</b> and <b>9</b>, uranyl ions are topologically sufficient for the formation of the cyclic or cage molecules, and the hydrated copper ions are located inside. The curved shape of the three-pronged Kemp’s tricarboxylate ligand appears well suited to the formation of closed species (nanotubes, rings, and cages), which are in all cases coated on the outside by the hydrophobic parts of the ligands

    Coordination Polymers and Cage-Containing Frameworks in Uranyl Ion Complexes with <i>rac</i>- and (1<i>R</i>,2<i>R</i>)-<i>trans</i>-1,2-Cyclo­hexane­dicarboxylates: Consequences of Chirality

    No full text
    Racemic and enantiopure (1<i>R</i>,2<i>R</i>) forms of <i>trans</i>-1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (H<sub>2</sub>chdc and <i>R</i>-H<sub>2</sub>chdc, respectively) have been used in the synthesis of a series of 13 uranyl ion complexes, all obtained under solvo-hydrothermal conditions and in the presence of additional metal cations and/or <i>N</i>-donor ligands. While the homometallic complex [UO<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)] (<b>1</b>) was only obtained with the enantiopure ligand, complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(THF)] (<b>2</b>), [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(DMF)] (<b>3</b>), and [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(NMP)] (<b>4</b>), with a coordinated solvent molecule, were obtained from the racemic form only; all crystallize as two-dimensional (2D) assemblies. The two complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(bipy)]­(<b>5</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)­(bipy)] (<b>6</b>), where bipy is 2,2′-bipyridine, are isomorphous since <b>5</b> crystallizes as a racemic conglomerate; they are both one-dimensional (1D) homochiral, helical polymers. The heterometallic complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>Cu­(chdc)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>7</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>Cu­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)]·3H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>8</b>) crystallize as a 1D or a 2D species, respectively, while [UO<sub>2</sub>Cd­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>9</b>) displays a 2D arrangement with the unusual Cairo pentagonal tiling topology. The four complexes [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>(chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>10</b>), [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Ag<sub>2</sub>(chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>11</b>), [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>12</b>), and [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Pb­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (<b>13</b>) are closely related, all of them containing tetranuclear, pseudo­tetrahedral [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(chdc/<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>4–</sup> cage motifs, that are assembled into a three-dimensional (3D) framework by bridging counterions (Na<sup>+</sup>, Ag<sup>+</sup>, or Pb<sup>2+</sup>). These cages define a new pathway to assembly of such species based on the unique coordination geometry of uranyl ion, differing from the widely exploited use of octahedral metal ions

    Coordination Polymers and Cage-Containing Frameworks in Uranyl Ion Complexes with <i>rac</i>- and (1<i>R</i>,2<i>R</i>)-<i>trans</i>-1,2-Cyclo­hexane­dicarboxylates: Consequences of Chirality

    No full text
    Racemic and enantiopure (1<i>R</i>,2<i>R</i>) forms of <i>trans</i>-1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (H<sub>2</sub>chdc and <i>R</i>-H<sub>2</sub>chdc, respectively) have been used in the synthesis of a series of 13 uranyl ion complexes, all obtained under solvo-hydrothermal conditions and in the presence of additional metal cations and/or <i>N</i>-donor ligands. While the homometallic complex [UO<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)] (<b>1</b>) was only obtained with the enantiopure ligand, complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(THF)] (<b>2</b>), [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(DMF)] (<b>3</b>), and [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(NMP)] (<b>4</b>), with a coordinated solvent molecule, were obtained from the racemic form only; all crystallize as two-dimensional (2D) assemblies. The two complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>(chdc)­(bipy)]­(<b>5</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)­(bipy)] (<b>6</b>), where bipy is 2,2′-bipyridine, are isomorphous since <b>5</b> crystallizes as a racemic conglomerate; they are both one-dimensional (1D) homochiral, helical polymers. The heterometallic complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>Cu­(chdc)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>7</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>Cu­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)]·3H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>8</b>) crystallize as a 1D or a 2D species, respectively, while [UO<sub>2</sub>Cd­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>9</b>) displays a 2D arrangement with the unusual Cairo pentagonal tiling topology. The four complexes [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>(chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>10</b>), [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Ag<sub>2</sub>(chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>11</b>), [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>12</b>), and [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Pb­(<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (<b>13</b>) are closely related, all of them containing tetranuclear, pseudo­tetrahedral [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(chdc/<i>R</i>-chdc)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>4–</sup> cage motifs, that are assembled into a three-dimensional (3D) framework by bridging counterions (Na<sup>+</sup>, Ag<sup>+</sup>, or Pb<sup>2+</sup>). These cages define a new pathway to assembly of such species based on the unique coordination geometry of uranyl ion, differing from the widely exploited use of octahedral metal ions

    Ag<sup>I</sup> and Pb<sup>II</sup> as Additional Assembling Cations in Uranyl Coordination Polymers and Frameworks

    No full text
    Five mono- or polycarboxylic acids have been used to generate a series of eight heterometallic uranyl complexes involving silver­(I) or lead­(II) cations, all synthesized under (solvo)-hydrothermal conditions. Pimelic acid (H<sub>2</sub>pim) gave complexes [Ag­(bipy)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>[UO<sub>2</sub>(pim)(NO<sub>3</sub>)]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>Pb­(pim)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·0.5bipy·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>2</b>) (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine), which both crystallize as one-dimensional (1D) polymers, but differ in that the silver­(I) cations are separate counterions, while carboxylate-bound lead­(II) cations are an essential component of the polymer. Only silver­(I)-containing species were obtained with all-<i>cis</i>-1,3,5-cyclohexanetricarboxylic acid (H<sub>3</sub>chtc), [UO<sub>2</sub>Ag­(chtc)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>3</b>) and [Ag­(bipy) (CH<sub>3</sub>CN)]<sub>2</sub>[UO<sub>2</sub>(chtc)]<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>); both contain two-dimensional (2D) uranyl carboxylate subunits with honeycomb {6<sup>3</sup>} topology, these being united into a three-dimensional (3D) framework with the lonsdaleite {6<sup>6</sup>} topology by bridging, oxo-bound silver­(I) cations in <b>3</b>. Both silver- and lead-containing complexes were obtained with 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyltetracarboxylic acid (H<sub>4</sub>bptc), [UO<sub>2</sub>Ag­(bptc)­(4,4′-bipyH)] (<b>5</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>Pb­(bptc)(bipy)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>6</b>) (4,4′-bipy = 4,4′-bipyridine), and they both display a 2D uranyl carboxylate network with the {4<sup>4</sup>.6<sup>2</sup>} topology, the additional cations and <i>N</i>-donors being decorating species. In this case, a higher dimensionality was obtained not with an additional cation, but with a coordinated <i>N</i>-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) molecule, since [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(bptc)(NMP)<sub>1.5</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>1.5</sub>]·1.5H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>7</b>) crystallizes as a three-dimensional (3D) framework. In the presence of silver­(I), 3-pyrimidin-2-yl-benzoic acid (Hpyb) gave the complex [UO<sub>2</sub>Ag­(pyb)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·4H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>8</b>), in which the two coordination sites are occupied in accord with Hard/Soft Acid/Base (HSAB) principles, uranyl being chelated by three carboxylate groups and silver­(I) being bound to nitrogen atoms; the 1D polymer formed bridges to another through silver–uranyl oxo bonding. In contrast, the homometallic, molecular complex [UO<sub>2</sub>(pyb)<sub>2</sub>(bipy)] (<b>9</b>) was obtained in the presence of lead­(II) cations. The lead-containing complex with 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (H<sub>2</sub>pydc), [UO<sub>2</sub>Pb<sub>2</sub>(pydc)<sub>2</sub>(phen)<sub>2</sub>(HCOO)<sub>1.5</sub>(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.5</sub>]·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>10</b>) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), crystallizes as a 1D polymer in which uranyl is bound to two O,N,O-donors, as usual with this ligand, polymerization being due to lateral double lead­(II) bridges. Variations in uranyl emission maxima positions appear to be essentially related to the uranium coordination number within the present series

    Tetrahydrofurantetracarboxylic Acid: An Isomerizable Framework-Forming Ligand in Homo- and Heterometallic Complexes with UO<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup>, Ag<sup>+</sup>, and Pb<sup>2+</sup>

    No full text
    (2<i>R*</i>,3<i>R*</i>,4<i>S*</i>,5<i>S*</i>)-Tetrahydrofurantetracarboxylic acid (H<sub>4</sub>thftc) has been used as a ligand to synthesize five uranyl ion complexes, three of them including additional silver­(I) or lead­(II) metal cations. The complex [C­(NH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub>[UO<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>thftc)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>1</b>), obtained in water at room temperature, is a discrete mononuclear species in which the uranyl cation is bound to the tridentate coordination site (involving the ether oxygen atom and the two adjoining carboxylate groups) of two ligands, and extensive hydrogen bonding is present. All the other complexes were obtained under (solvo)-hydrothermal conditions giving rise to higher degrees of ligand deprotonation. [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(Hthftc)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·2CH<sub>3</sub>CN (<b>2</b>) crystallizes as a two-dimensional (2D) network with the V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> topological type, whereas in the heterometallic complex [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Ag<sub>2</sub>(thftc)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>3</b>), similar 2D layers are assembled into a three-dimensional (3D) framework by bridging Ag<sub>2</sub> moieties. Lead­(II) replaces uranyl in the tridentate coordination site in the two complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>Pb­(thftc)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (<b>4</b>) and [UO<sub>2</sub>Pb­(thftc)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>5</b>), and the high connectivity of the ligand, bound to seven metal cations through diverse chelating and bridging interactions, ensures that both are 3D frameworks. Bonding of a uranyl oxo group to either silver­(I) or lead­(II) is apparent in complexes <b>3</b> and <b>5</b>. The homometallic complexes [Ag<sub>3</sub>(Hthftc)] (<b>6</b>) and [Pb<sub>2</sub>(thftc)­(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (<b>7</b>), devoid of uranyl cations, are both 3D frameworks in which the ligand is bound to 11 or 9 metal cations, respectively. Complex <b>6</b> is the single instance in this series in which the ligand, originally in the <i>trans,cis,trans</i> form, has undergone isomerization into the chiral <i>cis,trans,trans</i> (2<i>R*</i>,3<i>S*</i>,4<i>S*</i>,5<i>S*</i>) form through a process probably involving an ene-diol intermediate. Only complexes <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, and <b>4</b> display intense and well-resolved emission bands under excitation at 420 nm in the solid state, the uranyl emission of complexes <b>3</b> and <b>5</b> being largely quenched

    Uranyl Ion Complexes with all-<i>cis</i>-1,3,5-Cyclohexanetricarboxylate: Unexpected Framework and Nanotubular Assemblies

    No full text
    all-<i>cis</i>-1,3,5-Cyclohexanetricarboxylic acid (LH<sub>3</sub>) was reacted with uranyl nitrate under solvo-hydrothermal conditions, either alone or in the presence of additional metal cations (Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, or Tb<sup>3+</sup>), resulting in the crystallization of a series of eight complexes which were characterized by their crystal structures and luminescence properties. The six complexes [UO<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>2</sub>­·2H<sub>2</sub>O­·3THF (<b>1</b>), [Ni­(bipy)<sub>2</sub>­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>2</sub>­·4H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>2</b>), [Ni­(bipy)<sub>3</sub>]­[Ni­(bipy)<sub>2</sub>­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>4</sub>­·5H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>3</b>), [Ni­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>2</sub>­·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>4</b>), [Cu­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>2</sub>­·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>5</b>), and [Tb­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>8</sub>]­[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)]<sub>3</sub>­·8H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6</b>) all contain the same {UO<sub>2</sub>(L)<sup>−</sup>}<sub>∞</sub> anionic motif, in which the uranyl ion is tris-chelated by three L<sup>3–</sup> anions to give a two-dimensional assembly with hexagonal {6<sup>3</sup>} topology. The reaction of uranyl nitrate alone with LH<sub>3</sub> in water/<i>N</i>-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) yields the complex [(UO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(L)<sub>2</sub>­(NMP)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>7</b>), which crystallizes as a three-dimensional framework. Finally, in the presence of Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, or even Kemp’s triacid (<i>cis</i>,<i>cis</i>-1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid), the complex [UO<sub>2</sub>(LH)] (<b>8</b>) is generated, the structure of which displays a well-resolved nanotubular species possibly associated with extremely disordered molecules or counterions of uncertain nature. These nanotubules have {6<sup>3</sup>} topology and can be seen as resulting from the folding of the two-dimensional assembly present in the former complexes. Emission spectra measured in the solid state show the usual vibronic fine structure, with various degrees of resolution and quenching
    corecore