Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion : Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage

Data Availability Statement All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Purpose and scope

Peer reviewe

European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care

The European Best Practice Guideline group (EBPG) issued guidelines on the evaluation and selection of kidney donor and kidney transplant candidates, as well as post-transplant recipient care, in the year 2000 and 2002. The new European Renal Best Practice board decided in 2009 that these guidelines needed updating. In order to avoid duplication of efforts with kidney disease improving global outcomes, which published in 2009 clinical practice guidelines on the post-transplant care of kidney transplant recipients, we did not address these issues in the present guidelines. The guideline was developed following a rigorous methodological approach: (i) identification of clinical questions, (ii) prioritization of questions, (iii) systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available evidence and (iv) formulation of recommendations and grading according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The strength of each recommendation is rated 1 or 2, with 1 being a ‘We recommend' statement, and 2 being a ‘We suggest' statement. In addition, each statement is assigned an overall grade for the quality of evidence: A (high), B (moderate), C (low) or D (very low). The guideline makes recommendations for the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and perioperative recipient care. All together, the work group issued 112 statements. There were 51 (45%) recommendations graded ‘1', 18 (16%) were graded ‘2' and 43 (38%) statements were not graded. There were 0 (0%) recommendations graded ‘1A', 15 (13%) were ‘1B', 19 (17%) ‘1C' and 17 (15%) ‘1D'. None (0%) were graded ‘2A', 1 (0.9%) was ‘2B', 8 (7%) were ‘2C' and 9 (8%) ‘2D'. Limitations of the evidence, especially the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research. We present here the complete recommendations about the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and the perioperative recipient care. We hope that this document will help caregivers to improve the quality of care they deliver to patients. The full version with methods, rationale and references is published in Nephrol Dial Transplant (2013) 28: i1-i71; doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft218 and can be downloaded freely from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/ndt/era_edta.htm

Assessment of the consistency and robustness of results from a multicenter trial of remission maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Data from a randomized multinational phase 3 trial of 320 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) demonstrated that maintenance therapy with 3-week cycles of histamine dihydrochloride plus low-dose interleukin-2 (HDC/IL-2) for up to 18 months significantly improved leukemia-free survival (LFS) but lacked power to detect an overall survival (OS) difference.</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To assess the consistency of treatment benefit across patient subsets and the robustness of data with respect to trial centers and endpoints.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Forest plots were constructed with hazard ratios (HRs) of HDC/IL-2 treatment effects versus no treatment (control) for prospectively defined patient subsets. Inconsistency coefficients (I²) and interaction tests (X²) were used to detect any differences in benefit among subsets. Robustness of results to the elimination of individual study centers was performed using "leave-one-center-out" analyses. Associations between treatment effects on the endpoints were evaluated using weighted linear regression between HRs for LFS and OS estimated within countries.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The benefit of HDC/IL-2 over controls was statistically consistent across all subsets defined by baseline prognostic variables. I²and <it>P</it>-values of X²ranged from 0.00 to 0.51 and 0.14 to 0.91, respectively. Treatment effects were statistically significant in 14 of 28 subsets analyzed. The "leave-one-center-out" analysis confirmed that no single center dominated (<it>P</it>-values ranged from 0.004 to 0.020 [mean 0.009]). The HRs representing the HDC/IL-2 effects on LFS and OS were strongly correlated at the country level (R²= 0.84).</p> <p>Limitations</p> <p>Small sample sizes in some of the subsets analyzed.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These analyses confirm the consistency and robustness of the HDC/IL-2 effect as compared with no treatment. LFS may be an acceptable surrogate for OS in future AML trials. Analyses of consistency and robustness may aid interpretation of data from multicenter trials, especially in populations with rare diseases, when the size of randomized clinical trials is limited.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00003991">NCT00003991</a></p

Etat actuel de la transplantation pancréatique.

Today, combined kidney and pancreas transplantation is the best treatment for patients with type I diabetes and pre-end or end-stage renal disease due to the diabetic nephropathy. Twenty-nine patients underwent that procedure at our Institution. Recent technical modifications--with the use of a whole pancreas graft with urinary drainage of the exocrine secretion in the recipient by performing a pancreatico-duodeno-cystostomy--allow the monitoring of the exocrine secretion which is a pertinent immunological marker for pancreas rejection. In the next future, pancreas alone should be considered safely using the same procedure, in non uremic diabetic recipients in whom extra-renal secondary complications are more serious than the potential side effects of chronic immunosuppression. That type of pancreas transplantation should benefit of the forthcoming immunosuppressive drugs

Cyclosporin A efficacy and toxicity in organ transplantation with special focus on cadaveric renal transplantation.

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of cyclosporin A are reviewed. Its adverse reactions and posology in allograft transplantation are described according to clinical experience. Preliminary results with the use of cyclosporin A (Cy A) in primary cadaveric renal transplant patients, in comparison to 3 other conventional treatments, are reported in a randomized study of 69 patients: even if graft acute tubular necrosis is more frequent in the Cy A group, this group is the one which reaches the most successful short term renal graft survival