12 research outputs found

    Possible anti-anti CD3 (OKT3) activity in RES-1080

    No full text
    SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Immunopharmacological properties of RES-1080 in vitro

    No full text
    SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Polymorphonuclear neutrophils enhance anti-CD3-induced T cell activation: The role of polymorphonuclear FC-receptors

    No full text
    We investigated the effect of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) on anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3 and anti-Leu4)-mediated T cell activation. In the absence of monocytes, purified E-rosette-positive cells (further referred to as 'T cells') require either solid-phase bound anti-CD3 or the combination of both a high concentration of soluble anti-CD3 and exogenous recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) to proliferate. PMN cannot sustain T cell proliferation with soluble anti-CD3, but they markedly boost proliferation in the presence of soluble anti-CD3 and rIL-2. When PMN were added to T cell cultures stimulated with anti-CD3, this resulted in IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) expression and CD3 modulation. The mechanism of enhancement of anti-CD3-induced IL-2-responsiveness by PMN was further analyzed. A cellular T cell-PMN interaction was found to play a critical role and this was mediated through PMN Fc receptors (FcR). PMN bear two types of low-affinity FcR (FcRII and FcRIII). FcRII is known to bind mIgG1 (e.g. anti-Leu4) and FcRIII binds mIgG2a (e.g. OKT3). FcR involvement was demonstrated by two observations. Anti-FcRII mAb IV.3 inhibited the PMN signal for T cell activation with anti-Leu4. PMN bearing the second variant of FcRII which is unable to bind mIgG1 failed to promote anti-Leu4/IL-2-mediated T cell proliferation. Thus, PMN potentiate T cell responsiveness to IL-2 in the presence of anti-CD3 mAb and this potentiation by PMN requires interaction of anti-CD3 with PMN-FcR.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after Preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: Does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer radiation oncology group

    No full text
    Purpose European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22921 compared adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (CT) to no adjuvant treatment in a 2 x 2 factorial trial with randomization for preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy in patients with resectable T3-4 rectal cancer. The results showed no significant impact of adjuvant CT on progression-free or overall survival, although a difference seemed to emerge at approximately, respectively, 2 and 5 years after the start of preoperative treatment. We further explored the data with the aim of refining our understanding of the long-term results. Patients and Methods Data of 785 of the 1,011 randomly assigned patients who whose disease was M0 at curative surgery were used. Using meta-analytic methods, we investigated the homogeneity of the effect of adjuvant CT on the time to relapse or death after surgery (disease-free survival [DFS]) and survival in patient subgroups. Results Although there was no statistically significant impact of adjuvant CT on DFS for the whole group (P = .5), the treatment effect differed significantly between the ypT0- 2 and the ypT3-4 patients (heterogeneity P = .009): only the ypT0- 2 patients seemed to benefit from adjuvant CT (P = .011). The same pattern was observed for overall survival. Conclusion Exploratory analyses suggest that only good-prognosis patients (ypT0- 2) benefit from adjuvant CT. This could explain why, in the whole group, the progression-free and overall survival diverged only after the poor-prognosis patients (ypT3-4) had experienced treatment failure. Patients in whom no downstaging was achieved did not benefit. This also suggests that the same prognostic factors may drive both tumor sensitivity for the primary treatment and long-term clinical benefit from further adjuvant CT

    Randomized trial on the efficacy of radiotherapy for cerebral low-grade glioma in the adult: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study 22845 with the Medical Research Council study BRO4: an interim analysis.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the treatment strategy for adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. The diagnosis and primary treatment are usually undertaken by surgery. Some investigators doubt the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), whereas others advise routine postoperative RT. We report the primary results of a multicenter randomized trial on this controversy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 24 European centers, 311 adult patients with low-grade glioma were randomized centrally after surgery from March 1986 through September 1997, between the two arms of the trial. The irradiated group received 54 Gy in 6 weeks. The other patients did not receive any treatment after surgery until the tumor showed progression, defined as clinical-neurologic deterioration and evidence of progressive tumor on imaging. RESULTS: Of 290 eligible and assessable patients (93%), the irradiated group showed a significant (log-rank p = 0.02) improvement in time to progression but not in overall survival, with a median follow-up of 5 years. The 5-year estimate was, respectively, 63% vs. 66% (overall survival) and 44% vs. 37% (time to progression) for the treated and control arms. Different treatment modalities, including RT, were undertaken for the 85 controls when a progressive tumor was noted. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative conventional RT such as that used for this protocol appears to improve the time to progression or progression-free survival, but not overall survival, for patients with low-grade glioma.Clinical TrialJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Long-term efficacy of early versus delayed radiotherapy for low-grade astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults: the EORTC 22845 randomised trial.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative policies of "wait-and-see" and radiotherapy for low-grade glioma are poorly defined. A trial in the mid 1980s established the radiation dose. In 1986 the EORTC Radiotherapy and Brain Tumor Groups initiated a prospective trial to compare early radiotherapy with delayed radiotherapy. An interim analysis has been reported. We now present the long-term results. METHODS: After surgery, patients from 24 centres across Europe were randomly assigned to either early radiotherapy of 54 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy or deferred radiotherapy until the time of progression (control group). Patients with low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, mixed oligoastrocytoma, and incompletely resected pilocytic astrocytoma, with a WHO performance status 0-2 were eligible. Analysis was by intention to treat, and primary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival. FINDINGS: 157 patients were assigned early radiotherapy, and 157 control. Median progression-free survival was 5.3 years in the early radiotherapy group and 3.4 years in the control group (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77; p<0.0001). However, overall survival was similar between groups: median survival in the radiotherapy group was 7.4 years compared with 7.2 years in the control group (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.34; p=0.872). In the control group, 65% of patients received radiotherapy at progression. At 1 year, seizures were better controlled in the early radiotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Early radiotherapy after surgery lengthens the period without progression but does not affect overall survival. Because quality of life was not studied, it is not known whether time to progression reflects clinical deterioration. Radiotherapy could be deferred for patients with low-grade glioma who are in a good condition, provided they are carefully monitored.Clinical TrialComparative StudyJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H. ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore