A loss-of-function genetic screening reveals synergistic targeting of AKT/mTOR and WTN/β-catenin pathways for treatment of AML with high PRL-3 phosphatase

Abstract Background Protein tyrosine phosphatase of regenerating liver 3 (PRL-3) is overexpressed in a subset of AML patients with inferior prognosis, representing an attractive therapeutic target. However, due to relatively shallow pocket of the catalytic site of PRL-3, it is difficult to develop selective small molecule inhibitor. Methods In this study, we performed whole-genome lentiviral shRNA library screening to discover synthetic lethal target to PRL-3 in AML. We used specific small molecule inhibitors to validate the synthetic lethality in human PRL-3 high vs PRL-3 low human AML cell lines and primary bone marrow cells from AML patients. AML mouse xenograft model was used to examine the in vivo synergism. Results The list of genes depleted in TF1-hPRL3 cells was particularly enriched for members involved in WNT/β-catenin pathway and AKT/mTOR signaling. These findings prompted us to explore the impact of AKT/mTOR signaling inhibition in PRL-3 high AML cells in combination with WNT/β-catenin inhibitor. VS-5584, a novel, highly selective dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, and ICG-001, a WNT inhibitor, were used as a combination therapy. A synthetic lethal interaction between mTOR/AKT pathway inhibition and WNT/β-catenin was validated by a variety of cellular assays. Notably, we found that treatment with these two drugs significantly reduced leukemic burden and prolonged survival of mice transplanted with human PRL-3 high AML cells, but not with PRL-3 low AML cells. Conclusions In summary, our results support the existence of cooperative signaling networks between AKT/mTOR and WNT/β-catenin pathways in PRL-3 high AML cells. Simultaneous inhibition of these two pathways could achieve robust clinical efficacy for this subtype of AML patient with high PRL-3 expression and warrant further clinical investigation

Non-canonical activation of beta-catenin by PRL-3 phosphatase in acute myeloid leukemia

10.1038/s41388-018-0526-3ONCOGENE3891508-151

Genomewide Clonal Analysis of Lethal Mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster Eye: Comparison of the X Chromosome and Autosomes

Using a large consortium of undergraduate students in an organized program at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), we have undertaken a functional genomic screen in the Drosophila eye. In addition to the educational value of discovery-based learning, this article presents the first comprehensive genomewide analysis of essential genes involved in eye development. The data reveal the surprising result that the X chromosome has almost twice the frequency of essential genes involved in eye development as that found on the autosomes

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field