3 research outputs found

    Functional Annotation of ESR1 Gene Fusions in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

    Get PDF
    RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. We examined multiple ESR1 fusions and found that two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment-resistant disease, encoded stable and functional fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, ESR1 exons 1–6 were fused in frame to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties include estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, and anti-estrogen resistance. Both fusions activate a metastasis-associated transcriptional program, induce cellular motility, and promote the development of lung metastasis. ESR1-e6>YAP1- and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) naturally expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression, explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Lei et al. show that transcriptionally active estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) fusions identified from late-stage, treatment-refractory estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer drive pan-endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression. Growth of breast tumors driven by ESR1 fusions at primary and metastatic sties can be suppressed with a CDK4/6 inhibitor

    Generation of mammaglobin-A-specific CD4 T cells and identification of candidate CD4 epitopes for breast cancer vaccine strategies

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Mammaglobin-A (MGB) is a breast cancer-associated antigen that is an attractive target for immune intervention. MGB has been shown to induce a specific CD8 T cell response in breast cancer patients, but little is known about a possible MGB-specific CD4 T cell response. METHODS: Peripheral blood-derived CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells were stimulated in vitro with MGB-pulsed antigen-presenting cells (APC). The MGB and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II specificity of the CD4 T cell lines was confirmed by cytokine release following restimulation with autologous and allogenic APC pulsed with MGB from different sources. Candidate HLA class II-restricted epitopes were identified by computer algorithm and validated in cytokine release assays. RESULTS: MGB-specific CD4 T cells were successfully generated in cultures from six of seven donors. Restimulation of MGB-specific CD4 T cells with MGB-pulsed APC induced significantly higher levels of interferon (IFN)-gamma release than APC pulsed with an irrelevant protein (P = 0.0004). Cultures from five of seven donors showed a pure Th1 type response as evidenced by the absence of interleukin (IL)-4. MGB-specific CD4 T cells recognized both recombinant and naturally processed MGB presented by APC. This recognition was HLA class II-restricted, as HLA-DR mismatched APC were not recognized. MGB-specific CD4 T cells from three of four donors recognized MGB-derived, HLA class II-restricted peptides pulsed onto APC. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully generated MGB-specific CD4 T cell cultures and identified candidate MGB HLA class II epitopes. These studies should facilitate study of the CD4 T cell response to MGB, and the development and monitoring of vaccine strategies targeting this unique antigen
    corecore