Product Binding Enforces the Genomic Specificity of a Yeast Polycomb Repressive Complex

We characterize the Polycomb system that assembles repressive subtelomeric domains of H3K27 methylation (H3K27me) in the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Purification of this PRC2-like protein complex reveals orthologs of animal PRC2 components as well as a chromodomain-containing subunit, Ccc1, which recognizes H3K27me. Whereas removal of either the EZH or EED ortholog eliminates H3K27me, disruption of mark recognition by Ccc1 causes H3K27me to redistribute. Strikingly, the resulting pattern of H3K27me coincides with domains of heterochromatin marked by H3K9me. Indeed, additional removal of the C. neoformans H3K9 methyltransferase Clr4 results in loss of both H3K9me and the redistributed H3K27me marks. These findings indicate that the anchoring of a chromatin-modifying complex to its product suppresses its attraction to a different chromatin type, explaining how enzymes that act on histones, which often harbor product recognition modules, may deposit distinct chromatin domains despite sharing a highly abundant and largely identical substrate—the nucleosome

Product Binding Enforces the Genomic Specificity of a Yeast Polycomb Repressive Complex

We characterize the Polycomb system that assembles repressive subtelomeric domains of H3K27 methylation (H3K27me) in the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Purification of this PRC2-like protein complex reveals orthologs of animal PRC2 components as well as a chromodomain-containing subunit, Ccc1, which recognizes H3K27me. Whereas removal of either the EZH or EED ortholog eliminates H3K27me, disruption of mark recognition by Ccc1 causes H3K27me to redistribute. Strikingly, the resulting pattern of H3K27me coincides with domains of heterochromatin marked by H3K9me. Indeed, additional removal of the C. neoformans H3K9 methyltransferase Clr4 results in loss of both H3K9me and the redistributed H3K27me marks. These findings indicate that the anchoring of a chromatin-modifying complex to its product suppresses its attraction to a different chromatin type, explaining how enzymes that act on histones, which often harbor product recognition modules, may deposit distinct chromatin domains despite sharing a highly abundant and largely identical substrate—the nucleosome

Recognizing the enemy within: licensing RNA-guided genome defense

How do cells distinguish normal genes from transposons? Although much has been learned about RNAi-related RNA silencing pathways responsible for genome defense, this fundamental question remains. The literature points to several classes of mechanisms. In some cases, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) structures produced by transposon inverted repeats or antisense integration trigger endogenous small interfering RNA (siRNA) biogenesis. In other instances, DNA features associated with transposons--such as their unusual copy number, chromosomal arrangement, and/or chromatin environment--license RNA silencing. Finally, recent studies have identified improper transcript processing events, such as stalled pre-mRNA splicing, as signals for siRNA production. Thus, the suboptimal gene expression properties of selfish elements can enable their identification by RNA silencing pathways

The spliceosome as a transposon sensor

The ability to distinguish self from non-self nucleic acids enables eukaryotes to suppress mobile elements and maintain genome integrity. In organisms from protist to human, this function is performed by RNA silencing pathways. There have been major advances in our understanding of the RNA silencing machinery, but the mechanisms by which these pathways distinguish self from non-self remain unclear. Recent studies in the yeast C. neoformans indicate that transposon-derived transcripts encode suboptimal introns and tend to stall in spliceosomes, which promotes the biogenesis of siRNA that targets these transcripts. These findings identify gene expression signal strength as a metric by which a foreign element can be distinguished from a host gene, and reveal a new function for introns and the spliceosome in genome defense. Anticipating that these principles may apply to RNA silencing in other systems, we discuss strong hints in the literature suggesting that the spliceosome may guide small RNA biogenesis in the siRNA and piRNA pathways of plants and animals

The spliceosome as a transposon sensor

The ability to distinguish self from non-self nucleic acids enables eukaryotes to suppress mobile elements and maintain genome integrity. In organisms from protist to human, this function is performed by RNA silencing pathways. There have been major advances in our understanding of the RNA silencing machinery, but the mechanisms by which these pathways distinguish self from non-self remain unclear. Recent studies in the yeast C. neoformans indicate that transposon-derived transcripts encode suboptimal introns and tend to stall in spliceosomes, which promotes the biogenesis of siRNA that targets these transcripts. These findings identify gene expression signal strength as a metric by which a foreign element can be distinguished from a host gene, and reveal a new function for introns and the spliceosome in genome defense. Anticipating that these principles may apply to RNA silencing in other systems, we discuss strong hints in the literature suggesting that the spliceosome may guide small RNA biogenesis in the siRNA and piRNA pathways of plants and animals

ATP Hydrolysis by the SNF2 Domain of Dnmt5 Is Coupled to Both Specific Recognition and Modification of Hemimethylated DNA

C.neoformans Dnmt5 is an unusually specific maintenance-type CpG methyltransferase (DNMT) that mediates long-term epigenome evolution. It harbors a DNMT domain and SNF2 ATPase domain. We find that the SNF2 domain couples substrate specificity to an ATPase step essential for DNA methylation. Coupling occurs independent of nucleosomes. Hemimethylated DNA preferentially stimulates ATPase activity, and mutating Dnmt5's ATP-binding pocket disproportionately reduces ATPase stimulation by hemimethylated versus unmethylated substrates. Engineered DNA substrates that stabilize a reaction intermediate by mimicking a "flipped-out" conformation of the target cytosine bypass the SNF2 domain's requirement for hemimethylation. This result implies that ATP hydrolysis by the SNF2 domain is coupled to the DNMT domain conformational changes induced by preferred substrates. These findings establish a new role for a SNF2 ATPase: controlling an adjoined enzymatic domain's substrate recognition and catalysis. We speculate that this coupling contributes to the exquisite specificity of Dnmt5 via mechanisms related to kinetic proofreading