7 research outputs found

    Biological parameters.

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Group A1: RT PCR CHIKV positive patients. Group A2: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV positive, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients. Group B: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV negative, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group A2: <sup>¤¤¤</sup> p<0.001, <sup>¤¤</sup> p<0.01, <sup>¤</sup> p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group B:</i></b> *** <b><i>p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Average, standard deviation, percentage in parenthesis are indicated.</i></b></p><p><sup>#</sup><b><i>Physiological ranges.</i></b></p

    Clinical signs.

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Group A1: RT PCR CHIKV positive patients. Group A2: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV positive, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients. Group B: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV negative, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs Group A2: <sup>¤¤¤</sup> p<0.001, <sup>¤¤</sup> p<0.01, <sup>¤</sup> p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group B:</i></b> *** <b><i>p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Average, standard deviation, percentage in parenthesis are indicated.</i></b></p

    Arthralgia location.

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Group A1: RT PCR CHIKV positive patients. Group A2: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV positive, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients. Group B: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV negative, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group A2: <sup>¤¤¤</sup> p<0.001, <sup>¤¤</sup> p<0.01, <sup>¤</sup> p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group B:</i></b> *** <b><i>p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Average, standard deviation, percentage in parenthesis are indicated.</i></b></p

    Cutaneomucosal signs.

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Group A1: RT PCR CHIKV positive patients. Group A2: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV positive, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients. Group B: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV negative, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group A2: <sup>¤¤¤</sup> p<0.001, <sup>¤¤</sup> p<0.01, <sup>¤</sup> p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group B:</i></b> *** <b><i>p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Average, standard deviation, percentage in parenthesis are indicated.</i></b></p

    Demographic data.

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Group A1: RT PCR CHIKV positive patients. Group A2: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV positive, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients. Group B: RT PCR CHIKV negative, IgM anti CHIKV negative, IgG anti CHIKV negative patients.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group A2: <sup>¤¤¤</sup> p<0.001, <sup>¤¤</sup> p<0.01, <sup>¤</sup> p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Group A1 vs. Group B:</i></b> *** <b><i>p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0,05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>Average, standard deviation, percentage in parenthesis are indicated.</i></b></p

    Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic-1

    No full text
    On-based SEROCHIK survey (right scale). For the serosurvey, both self-reports (all subjects who have declared that they have been infected, without taking into account serology results) and confirmed self-reports (with a positive serology) are noted. We refer to the date of first clinical signs declared by the subjects during the survey conducted between August 172006 and October 202006. "Suspected cases" are defined as cases with a sudden onset of fever with temperature > 38.5°C and incapacitating arthralgia.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/99</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2008;8():99-99.</p><p>Published online 28 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2528011.</p><p></p

    Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic-0

    No full text
    On-based SEROCHIK survey (right scale). For the serosurvey, both self-reports (all subjects who have declared that they have been infected, without taking into account serology results) and confirmed self-reports (with a positive serology) are noted. We refer to the date of first clinical signs declared by the subjects during the survey conducted between August 172006 and October 202006. "Suspected cases" are defined as cases with a sudden onset of fever with temperature > 38.5°C and incapacitating arthralgia.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/99</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2008;8():99-99.</p><p>Published online 28 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2528011.</p><p></p
    corecore